Cargando…

Combining four screening tools for cost effective screening of OSA in train drivers: A UK experience

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in drivers/workers has been implicated in railway and road traffic safety incidents; however, there are insufficient data on its prevalence and cost-effective screening methods. AIM: This pragmatic study examines four OSA screening tools: the Epworth sleepi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ogunyemi, Lanre, Nafisa, Syeda, Stacey, Tanya, Sovani, Milind
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10174652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37006091
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_337_22
_version_ 1785040079620669440
author Ogunyemi, Lanre
Nafisa, Syeda
Stacey, Tanya
Sovani, Milind
author_facet Ogunyemi, Lanre
Nafisa, Syeda
Stacey, Tanya
Sovani, Milind
author_sort Ogunyemi, Lanre
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in drivers/workers has been implicated in railway and road traffic safety incidents; however, there are insufficient data on its prevalence and cost-effective screening methods. AIM: This pragmatic study examines four OSA screening tools: the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), the STOP-Bang (SB), the adjusted neck circumference (ANC) and the body mass index (BMI), exploring their suitability and effectiveness separately and in combination. METHOD: Using all four tools, 292 train drivers were opportunistically screened between 2016 and 2017. A polygraph (PG) test was carried out when OSA was suspected. Patients with an apnoea–hypopnea index (AHI) ≥5 were referred to a clinical specialist and reviewed annually. Those who had continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment were evaluated for compliance and control. RESULTS: Of the 40 patients who had PG testing, 3 and 23 participants met the ESS >10 and SB >4, criteria, respectively, whereas 25 participants each had an ANC >48 and a BMI >35 with a risk factor or ≥40 with none. OSA was detected in 3, 18 and 16 of them who met the ESS, SB and ANC criteria, respectively, and was positive for OSA in addition to 16 others who met the BMI criteria. A total of 28 (72%) were diagnosed with OSA. CONCLUSION: Although when used individually, these screening methods are less effective/inadequate, combining them is easy, feasible and offers the maximum chance of OSA detection in train drivers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10174652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101746522023-05-12 Combining four screening tools for cost effective screening of OSA in train drivers: A UK experience Ogunyemi, Lanre Nafisa, Syeda Stacey, Tanya Sovani, Milind Lung India Original Article BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in drivers/workers has been implicated in railway and road traffic safety incidents; however, there are insufficient data on its prevalence and cost-effective screening methods. AIM: This pragmatic study examines four OSA screening tools: the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), the STOP-Bang (SB), the adjusted neck circumference (ANC) and the body mass index (BMI), exploring their suitability and effectiveness separately and in combination. METHOD: Using all four tools, 292 train drivers were opportunistically screened between 2016 and 2017. A polygraph (PG) test was carried out when OSA was suspected. Patients with an apnoea–hypopnea index (AHI) ≥5 were referred to a clinical specialist and reviewed annually. Those who had continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment were evaluated for compliance and control. RESULTS: Of the 40 patients who had PG testing, 3 and 23 participants met the ESS >10 and SB >4, criteria, respectively, whereas 25 participants each had an ANC >48 and a BMI >35 with a risk factor or ≥40 with none. OSA was detected in 3, 18 and 16 of them who met the ESS, SB and ANC criteria, respectively, and was positive for OSA in addition to 16 others who met the BMI criteria. A total of 28 (72%) were diagnosed with OSA. CONCLUSION: Although when used individually, these screening methods are less effective/inadequate, combining them is easy, feasible and offers the maximum chance of OSA detection in train drivers. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10174652/ /pubmed/37006091 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_337_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Indian Chest Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ogunyemi, Lanre
Nafisa, Syeda
Stacey, Tanya
Sovani, Milind
Combining four screening tools for cost effective screening of OSA in train drivers: A UK experience
title Combining four screening tools for cost effective screening of OSA in train drivers: A UK experience
title_full Combining four screening tools for cost effective screening of OSA in train drivers: A UK experience
title_fullStr Combining four screening tools for cost effective screening of OSA in train drivers: A UK experience
title_full_unstemmed Combining four screening tools for cost effective screening of OSA in train drivers: A UK experience
title_short Combining four screening tools for cost effective screening of OSA in train drivers: A UK experience
title_sort combining four screening tools for cost effective screening of osa in train drivers: a uk experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10174652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37006091
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_337_22
work_keys_str_mv AT ogunyemilanre combiningfourscreeningtoolsforcosteffectivescreeningofosaintraindriversaukexperience
AT nafisasyeda combiningfourscreeningtoolsforcosteffectivescreeningofosaintraindriversaukexperience
AT staceytanya combiningfourscreeningtoolsforcosteffectivescreeningofosaintraindriversaukexperience
AT sovanimilind combiningfourscreeningtoolsforcosteffectivescreeningofosaintraindriversaukexperience