Cargando…

The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19

In a representative sample of the U.S. population during the first summer of the COVID-19 pandemic, we investigate how prosociality and ideology interact in their relationship with health-protecting behavior and trust in the government to handle the crisis. We find that an experimental measure of pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grimalda, Gianluca, Murtin, Fabrice, Pipke, David, Putterman, Louis, Sutter, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10174729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37234383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104472
_version_ 1785040097245134848
author Grimalda, Gianluca
Murtin, Fabrice
Pipke, David
Putterman, Louis
Sutter, Matthias
author_facet Grimalda, Gianluca
Murtin, Fabrice
Pipke, David
Putterman, Louis
Sutter, Matthias
author_sort Grimalda, Gianluca
collection PubMed
description In a representative sample of the U.S. population during the first summer of the COVID-19 pandemic, we investigate how prosociality and ideology interact in their relationship with health-protecting behavior and trust in the government to handle the crisis. We find that an experimental measure of prosociality based on standard economic games positively relates to protective behavior. Conservatives are less compliant with COVID-19-related behavioral restrictions than liberals and evaluate the government's handling of the crisis significantly more positively. We show that prosociality does not mediate the impact of political ideology. This finding means that conservatives are less compliant with protective health guidelines - independent of differences in prosociality between both ideological camps. Behavioral differences between liberals and conservatives are roughly only one-fourth of the size of their differences in judging the government's crisis management. This result suggests that Americans were more polarized in their political views than in their acceptance of public health advice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10174729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101747292023-05-12 The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19 Grimalda, Gianluca Murtin, Fabrice Pipke, David Putterman, Louis Sutter, Matthias Eur Econ Rev Article In a representative sample of the U.S. population during the first summer of the COVID-19 pandemic, we investigate how prosociality and ideology interact in their relationship with health-protecting behavior and trust in the government to handle the crisis. We find that an experimental measure of prosociality based on standard economic games positively relates to protective behavior. Conservatives are less compliant with COVID-19-related behavioral restrictions than liberals and evaluate the government's handling of the crisis significantly more positively. We show that prosociality does not mediate the impact of political ideology. This finding means that conservatives are less compliant with protective health guidelines - independent of differences in prosociality between both ideological camps. Behavioral differences between liberals and conservatives are roughly only one-fourth of the size of their differences in judging the government's crisis management. This result suggests that Americans were more polarized in their political views than in their acceptance of public health advice. Elsevier B.V. 2023-07 2023-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10174729/ /pubmed/37234383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104472 Text en © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Grimalda, Gianluca
Murtin, Fabrice
Pipke, David
Putterman, Louis
Sutter, Matthias
The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19
title The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19
title_full The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19
title_fullStr The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19
title_short The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19
title_sort politicized pandemic: ideological polarization and the behavioral response to covid-19
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10174729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37234383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104472
work_keys_str_mv AT grimaldagianluca thepoliticizedpandemicideologicalpolarizationandthebehavioralresponsetocovid19
AT murtinfabrice thepoliticizedpandemicideologicalpolarizationandthebehavioralresponsetocovid19
AT pipkedavid thepoliticizedpandemicideologicalpolarizationandthebehavioralresponsetocovid19
AT puttermanlouis thepoliticizedpandemicideologicalpolarizationandthebehavioralresponsetocovid19
AT suttermatthias thepoliticizedpandemicideologicalpolarizationandthebehavioralresponsetocovid19
AT grimaldagianluca politicizedpandemicideologicalpolarizationandthebehavioralresponsetocovid19
AT murtinfabrice politicizedpandemicideologicalpolarizationandthebehavioralresponsetocovid19
AT pipkedavid politicizedpandemicideologicalpolarizationandthebehavioralresponsetocovid19
AT puttermanlouis politicizedpandemicideologicalpolarizationandthebehavioralresponsetocovid19
AT suttermatthias politicizedpandemicideologicalpolarizationandthebehavioralresponsetocovid19