Cargando…
The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19
In a representative sample of the U.S. population during the first summer of the COVID-19 pandemic, we investigate how prosociality and ideology interact in their relationship with health-protecting behavior and trust in the government to handle the crisis. We find that an experimental measure of pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10174729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37234383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104472 |
_version_ | 1785040097245134848 |
---|---|
author | Grimalda, Gianluca Murtin, Fabrice Pipke, David Putterman, Louis Sutter, Matthias |
author_facet | Grimalda, Gianluca Murtin, Fabrice Pipke, David Putterman, Louis Sutter, Matthias |
author_sort | Grimalda, Gianluca |
collection | PubMed |
description | In a representative sample of the U.S. population during the first summer of the COVID-19 pandemic, we investigate how prosociality and ideology interact in their relationship with health-protecting behavior and trust in the government to handle the crisis. We find that an experimental measure of prosociality based on standard economic games positively relates to protective behavior. Conservatives are less compliant with COVID-19-related behavioral restrictions than liberals and evaluate the government's handling of the crisis significantly more positively. We show that prosociality does not mediate the impact of political ideology. This finding means that conservatives are less compliant with protective health guidelines - independent of differences in prosociality between both ideological camps. Behavioral differences between liberals and conservatives are roughly only one-fourth of the size of their differences in judging the government's crisis management. This result suggests that Americans were more polarized in their political views than in their acceptance of public health advice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10174729 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101747292023-05-12 The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19 Grimalda, Gianluca Murtin, Fabrice Pipke, David Putterman, Louis Sutter, Matthias Eur Econ Rev Article In a representative sample of the U.S. population during the first summer of the COVID-19 pandemic, we investigate how prosociality and ideology interact in their relationship with health-protecting behavior and trust in the government to handle the crisis. We find that an experimental measure of prosociality based on standard economic games positively relates to protective behavior. Conservatives are less compliant with COVID-19-related behavioral restrictions than liberals and evaluate the government's handling of the crisis significantly more positively. We show that prosociality does not mediate the impact of political ideology. This finding means that conservatives are less compliant with protective health guidelines - independent of differences in prosociality between both ideological camps. Behavioral differences between liberals and conservatives are roughly only one-fourth of the size of their differences in judging the government's crisis management. This result suggests that Americans were more polarized in their political views than in their acceptance of public health advice. Elsevier B.V. 2023-07 2023-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10174729/ /pubmed/37234383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104472 Text en © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Grimalda, Gianluca Murtin, Fabrice Pipke, David Putterman, Louis Sutter, Matthias The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19 |
title | The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19 |
title_full | The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19 |
title_short | The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19 |
title_sort | politicized pandemic: ideological polarization and the behavioral response to covid-19 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10174729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37234383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104472 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grimaldagianluca thepoliticizedpandemicideologicalpolarizationandthebehavioralresponsetocovid19 AT murtinfabrice thepoliticizedpandemicideologicalpolarizationandthebehavioralresponsetocovid19 AT pipkedavid thepoliticizedpandemicideologicalpolarizationandthebehavioralresponsetocovid19 AT puttermanlouis thepoliticizedpandemicideologicalpolarizationandthebehavioralresponsetocovid19 AT suttermatthias thepoliticizedpandemicideologicalpolarizationandthebehavioralresponsetocovid19 AT grimaldagianluca politicizedpandemicideologicalpolarizationandthebehavioralresponsetocovid19 AT murtinfabrice politicizedpandemicideologicalpolarizationandthebehavioralresponsetocovid19 AT pipkedavid politicizedpandemicideologicalpolarizationandthebehavioralresponsetocovid19 AT puttermanlouis politicizedpandemicideologicalpolarizationandthebehavioralresponsetocovid19 AT suttermatthias politicizedpandemicideologicalpolarizationandthebehavioralresponsetocovid19 |