Cargando…

Factors influencing successful reconstruction of tympanic membrane perforations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: Based on a systematic review and meta-analysis, our study aimed to provide information about the factors that influence the success of tympanic membrane reconstruction. METHODS: Our systematic search was conducted on November 24, 2021, using the CENTRAL, Embase, and MEDLINE databases. Obser...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Illés, Kata, Gergő, Dorottya, Keresztély, Zsuzsanna, Dembrovszky, Fanni, Fehérvári, Péter, Bánvölgyi, András, Csupor, Dezső, Hegyi, Péter, Horváth, Tamás
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10175362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36811654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07831-2
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Based on a systematic review and meta-analysis, our study aimed to provide information about the factors that influence the success of tympanic membrane reconstruction. METHODS: Our systematic search was conducted on November 24, 2021, using the CENTRAL, Embase, and MEDLINE databases. Observational studies with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up on type I tympanoplasty or myringoplasty were included, while non-English articles, patients with cholesteatoma or specific inflammatory diseases, and ossiculoplasty cases were excluded. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42021289240) and PRISMA reporting guideline was used. Risk of bias was evaluated with the QUIPS tool. A random effect model was used in the analyses. Primary outcome was the rate of closed tympanic cavities. RESULTS: After duplicate removal, 9454 articles were found, of which 39 cohort studies were included. Results of four analyses showed significant effects: age (OR: 0.62, CI 0.50; 0.78, p value: 0.0002), size of the perforation (OR: 0.52, CI 0.29; 0.94, p value: 0.033), opposite ear condition (OR: 0.32, CI 0.12; 0.85, p value: 0.028), and the surgeon’s experience (OR: 0.42, CI 0.26; 0.67, p value: 0.005), while prior adenoid surgery, smoking, the site of the perforation, and discharge of the ear did not. Four factors: etiology, Eustachian tube function, concomitant allergic rhinitis, and duration of the ear discharge were analyzed qualitatively. CONCLUSIONS: The age of the patient, the size of the perforation, the opposite ear status, and the surgeon’s experience have a significant effect on the success of tympanic membrane reconstruction. Further comprehensive studies are needed to analyze the interactions between the factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Not applicable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-023-07831-2.