Cargando…

Those who speak survive: the value of the verbal component of GCS in trauma

AIM: To evaluate the value of the individual components of GCS in predicting the survival of trauma patients in the Emergency Department. METHODS: Trauma patients who were admitted for more than 24 h or died after arrival at Al-Ain Hospital from January 2014 to December 2017 were studied. Children &...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cevik, Arif Alper, Alao, David Olukolade, Alyafei, Eman, Abu-Zidan, Fikri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10175383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36335514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02153-0
_version_ 1785040203075813376
author Cevik, Arif Alper
Alao, David Olukolade
Alyafei, Eman
Abu-Zidan, Fikri
author_facet Cevik, Arif Alper
Alao, David Olukolade
Alyafei, Eman
Abu-Zidan, Fikri
author_sort Cevik, Arif Alper
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate the value of the individual components of GCS in predicting the survival of trauma patients in the Emergency Department. METHODS: Trauma patients who were admitted for more than 24 h or died after arrival at Al-Ain Hospital from January 2014 to December 2017 were studied. Children < 16 years, elderly > 80 years, patients with facial injuries, those intubated in the ER, and those with missing primary outcomes were excluded. Demography, vital signs, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), GCS components, Injury Severity Score (ISS), head AIS, and death were compared between those who died and those who survived. Factors with a p value of < 0.1 were entered into a backward likelihood logistic regression model to define factors that predict death. RESULTS: A total of 2548 patients were studied, out of whom 11 (0.4%) died. The verbal component of GCS (p < 0.001) and the ISS (p = 0.047) were the only significant predictors for death in the logistic regression model. The AUC (95% CI) of the GCS-VR was 0.763 (0.58–0.95), p = 0.003. The best point of GCS-VR that predicted survival was 5, having a sensitivity of 97%, a specificity of 54.5%, positive predictive value of 99. 8%, negative predictive value of 7.3%, and likelihood ratio of 2.13. CONCLUSION: In general trauma patients, acute trauma care professionals can use GCS-VR to predict survival when clinical condition permits instead of the total GCS score or ISS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10175383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101753832023-05-13 Those who speak survive: the value of the verbal component of GCS in trauma Cevik, Arif Alper Alao, David Olukolade Alyafei, Eman Abu-Zidan, Fikri Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Original Article AIM: To evaluate the value of the individual components of GCS in predicting the survival of trauma patients in the Emergency Department. METHODS: Trauma patients who were admitted for more than 24 h or died after arrival at Al-Ain Hospital from January 2014 to December 2017 were studied. Children < 16 years, elderly > 80 years, patients with facial injuries, those intubated in the ER, and those with missing primary outcomes were excluded. Demography, vital signs, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), GCS components, Injury Severity Score (ISS), head AIS, and death were compared between those who died and those who survived. Factors with a p value of < 0.1 were entered into a backward likelihood logistic regression model to define factors that predict death. RESULTS: A total of 2548 patients were studied, out of whom 11 (0.4%) died. The verbal component of GCS (p < 0.001) and the ISS (p = 0.047) were the only significant predictors for death in the logistic regression model. The AUC (95% CI) of the GCS-VR was 0.763 (0.58–0.95), p = 0.003. The best point of GCS-VR that predicted survival was 5, having a sensitivity of 97%, a specificity of 54.5%, positive predictive value of 99. 8%, negative predictive value of 7.3%, and likelihood ratio of 2.13. CONCLUSION: In general trauma patients, acute trauma care professionals can use GCS-VR to predict survival when clinical condition permits instead of the total GCS score or ISS. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-06 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10175383/ /pubmed/36335514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02153-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Cevik, Arif Alper
Alao, David Olukolade
Alyafei, Eman
Abu-Zidan, Fikri
Those who speak survive: the value of the verbal component of GCS in trauma
title Those who speak survive: the value of the verbal component of GCS in trauma
title_full Those who speak survive: the value of the verbal component of GCS in trauma
title_fullStr Those who speak survive: the value of the verbal component of GCS in trauma
title_full_unstemmed Those who speak survive: the value of the verbal component of GCS in trauma
title_short Those who speak survive: the value of the verbal component of GCS in trauma
title_sort those who speak survive: the value of the verbal component of gcs in trauma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10175383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36335514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02153-0
work_keys_str_mv AT cevikarifalper thosewhospeaksurvivethevalueoftheverbalcomponentofgcsintrauma
AT alaodavidolukolade thosewhospeaksurvivethevalueoftheverbalcomponentofgcsintrauma
AT alyafeieman thosewhospeaksurvivethevalueoftheverbalcomponentofgcsintrauma
AT abuzidanfikri thosewhospeaksurvivethevalueoftheverbalcomponentofgcsintrauma