Cargando…
Intercalary fragments in posterior malleolar fractures: incidence, treatment implications, and distribution within CT-based classification systems
INTRODUCTION: Complex ankle fractures frequently include the posterior malleolus (PM). Despite advances in diagnostic and treatment strategies, PM fracture involvement still predisposes to worse outcomes. While not incorporated into the most common PM fracture classifications, the presence of an int...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10175417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36331574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02119-2 |
_version_ | 1785040208939450368 |
---|---|
author | Mueller, Elena Kleinertz, Holger Tessarzyk, Marlon Rammelt, Stefan Bartoníček, Jan Frosch, Karl-Heinz Barg, Alexej Schlickewei, Carsten |
author_facet | Mueller, Elena Kleinertz, Holger Tessarzyk, Marlon Rammelt, Stefan Bartoníček, Jan Frosch, Karl-Heinz Barg, Alexej Schlickewei, Carsten |
author_sort | Mueller, Elena |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Complex ankle fractures frequently include the posterior malleolus (PM). Despite advances in diagnostic and treatment strategies, PM fracture involvement still predisposes to worse outcomes. While not incorporated into the most common PM fracture classifications, the presence of an intercalary fragment (ICF) complicates treatment. This study aims to describe the incidence, morphology, and location of ICFs in PM fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 135 patients with a mean age of 54.4 (SD ± 18.9) years and PM fractures were analyzed for the presence of an ICF. Patients with an ICF were compared to those without in terms of age, gender, and treatment received. Characteristics of the ICFs in terms of location and size were assessed. Furthermore, the presence of an ICF in relation to the PM fracture classification according to Haraguchi et al., Bartoníček/Rammelt et al., and Mason et al. was investigated. RESULTS: ICFs presented in 55 (41%) of the 135 patients. Patients with an ICF were younger, and the PM was more often operatively treated when compared to patients without an ICF. A posterolateral approach was used significantly more often in patients with an ICF. Almost all ICFs were found in the posterolateral (58%) and posterocentral (35%) regions. The majority of fragments were found in Bartoníček/Rammelt type 2 fractures, the most common fracture type. Bartoníček/Rammelt type 3 fractures had the highest relative frequency of ICFs. CONCLUSION: ICFs are frequently found in PM fractures; however, they are not incorporated into any of the common classifications. They are generally found in younger patients and associated with more complex PM fractures. As they can complicate reduction of the main fragment and may require direct exposure to restore joint congruency, ICFs should be considered in PM fracture classifications. Due to their location, the majority of ICFs are able to be accessed using a posterolateral approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10175417 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101754172023-05-13 Intercalary fragments in posterior malleolar fractures: incidence, treatment implications, and distribution within CT-based classification systems Mueller, Elena Kleinertz, Holger Tessarzyk, Marlon Rammelt, Stefan Bartoníček, Jan Frosch, Karl-Heinz Barg, Alexej Schlickewei, Carsten Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Original Article INTRODUCTION: Complex ankle fractures frequently include the posterior malleolus (PM). Despite advances in diagnostic and treatment strategies, PM fracture involvement still predisposes to worse outcomes. While not incorporated into the most common PM fracture classifications, the presence of an intercalary fragment (ICF) complicates treatment. This study aims to describe the incidence, morphology, and location of ICFs in PM fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 135 patients with a mean age of 54.4 (SD ± 18.9) years and PM fractures were analyzed for the presence of an ICF. Patients with an ICF were compared to those without in terms of age, gender, and treatment received. Characteristics of the ICFs in terms of location and size were assessed. Furthermore, the presence of an ICF in relation to the PM fracture classification according to Haraguchi et al., Bartoníček/Rammelt et al., and Mason et al. was investigated. RESULTS: ICFs presented in 55 (41%) of the 135 patients. Patients with an ICF were younger, and the PM was more often operatively treated when compared to patients without an ICF. A posterolateral approach was used significantly more often in patients with an ICF. Almost all ICFs were found in the posterolateral (58%) and posterocentral (35%) regions. The majority of fragments were found in Bartoníček/Rammelt type 2 fractures, the most common fracture type. Bartoníček/Rammelt type 3 fractures had the highest relative frequency of ICFs. CONCLUSION: ICFs are frequently found in PM fractures; however, they are not incorporated into any of the common classifications. They are generally found in younger patients and associated with more complex PM fractures. As they can complicate reduction of the main fragment and may require direct exposure to restore joint congruency, ICFs should be considered in PM fracture classifications. Due to their location, the majority of ICFs are able to be accessed using a posterolateral approach. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-04 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10175417/ /pubmed/36331574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02119-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mueller, Elena Kleinertz, Holger Tessarzyk, Marlon Rammelt, Stefan Bartoníček, Jan Frosch, Karl-Heinz Barg, Alexej Schlickewei, Carsten Intercalary fragments in posterior malleolar fractures: incidence, treatment implications, and distribution within CT-based classification systems |
title | Intercalary fragments in posterior malleolar fractures: incidence, treatment implications, and distribution within CT-based classification systems |
title_full | Intercalary fragments in posterior malleolar fractures: incidence, treatment implications, and distribution within CT-based classification systems |
title_fullStr | Intercalary fragments in posterior malleolar fractures: incidence, treatment implications, and distribution within CT-based classification systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Intercalary fragments in posterior malleolar fractures: incidence, treatment implications, and distribution within CT-based classification systems |
title_short | Intercalary fragments in posterior malleolar fractures: incidence, treatment implications, and distribution within CT-based classification systems |
title_sort | intercalary fragments in posterior malleolar fractures: incidence, treatment implications, and distribution within ct-based classification systems |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10175417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36331574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02119-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muellerelena intercalaryfragmentsinposteriormalleolarfracturesincidencetreatmentimplicationsanddistributionwithinctbasedclassificationsystems AT kleinertzholger intercalaryfragmentsinposteriormalleolarfracturesincidencetreatmentimplicationsanddistributionwithinctbasedclassificationsystems AT tessarzykmarlon intercalaryfragmentsinposteriormalleolarfracturesincidencetreatmentimplicationsanddistributionwithinctbasedclassificationsystems AT rammeltstefan intercalaryfragmentsinposteriormalleolarfracturesincidencetreatmentimplicationsanddistributionwithinctbasedclassificationsystems AT bartonicekjan intercalaryfragmentsinposteriormalleolarfracturesincidencetreatmentimplicationsanddistributionwithinctbasedclassificationsystems AT froschkarlheinz intercalaryfragmentsinposteriormalleolarfracturesincidencetreatmentimplicationsanddistributionwithinctbasedclassificationsystems AT bargalexej intercalaryfragmentsinposteriormalleolarfracturesincidencetreatmentimplicationsanddistributionwithinctbasedclassificationsystems AT schlickeweicarsten intercalaryfragmentsinposteriormalleolarfracturesincidencetreatmentimplicationsanddistributionwithinctbasedclassificationsystems |