Cargando…
Feasibility and optimal choice of stimulation parameters for supramaximal stimulation of motor evoked potentials
Purpose: The aim was to investigate the feasibility and optimal stimulation parameters for supramaximal stimulation of muscle recorded transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials (mTc-MEP). Methods: Forty-seven consecutive patients that underwent scoliosis surgery were included. Firs...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10175431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36635569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00972-5 |
_version_ | 1785040211906920448 |
---|---|
author | Dulfer, S. E. Lange, F. Sahinovic, M. M. Wapstra, F. H. Absalom, A. R. Faber, C. Groen, R. J.M. Drost, G. |
author_facet | Dulfer, S. E. Lange, F. Sahinovic, M. M. Wapstra, F. H. Absalom, A. R. Faber, C. Groen, R. J.M. Drost, G. |
author_sort | Dulfer, S. E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: The aim was to investigate the feasibility and optimal stimulation parameters for supramaximal stimulation of muscle recorded transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials (mTc-MEP). Methods: Forty-seven consecutive patients that underwent scoliosis surgery were included. First, the feasibility of supramaximal stimulation was assessed for two settings (setting 1: pulse duration 0.075ms, interstimulus interval (ISI) 1.5ms; setting 2: pulse duration 0.300ms, ISI 3ms). Thereafter, three mTc-MEP parameters were considered for both settings; (1) elicitability, (2) amplitude, and (3) if supramaximal stimulation was achieved with ≥ 20 V below maximum output. Finally, ISIs (1ms–4ms) were optimized for setting 1. Results: Nine patients (19.15%) were excluded. Of the remaining patients, supramaximal stimulation was achieved in all patients for setting 1, and in 26 (68.42%) for setting 2. In one patient, mTc-MEPs were elicitable in more muscles for setting (1) Amplitudes were not significantly different. Stimulation voltage could be increased ≥ 20 V in all 38 patients for setting 1 and in 10 (38.46%) for setting (2) Optimal ISI’s differed widely. Conclusion: We recommend using setting 1 when monitoring mTc-MEPs with supramaximal stimulation, after which an individualized ISI optimization can be performed. Moreover, when using supramaximal stimulation, short ISI’s (i.e. 1ms or 1.5ms) can be the optimal ISI for obtaining the highest mTc-MEP amplitude. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10877-022-00972-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10175431 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101754312023-05-13 Feasibility and optimal choice of stimulation parameters for supramaximal stimulation of motor evoked potentials Dulfer, S. E. Lange, F. Sahinovic, M. M. Wapstra, F. H. Absalom, A. R. Faber, C. Groen, R. J.M. Drost, G. J Clin Monit Comput Original Research Purpose: The aim was to investigate the feasibility and optimal stimulation parameters for supramaximal stimulation of muscle recorded transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials (mTc-MEP). Methods: Forty-seven consecutive patients that underwent scoliosis surgery were included. First, the feasibility of supramaximal stimulation was assessed for two settings (setting 1: pulse duration 0.075ms, interstimulus interval (ISI) 1.5ms; setting 2: pulse duration 0.300ms, ISI 3ms). Thereafter, three mTc-MEP parameters were considered for both settings; (1) elicitability, (2) amplitude, and (3) if supramaximal stimulation was achieved with ≥ 20 V below maximum output. Finally, ISIs (1ms–4ms) were optimized for setting 1. Results: Nine patients (19.15%) were excluded. Of the remaining patients, supramaximal stimulation was achieved in all patients for setting 1, and in 26 (68.42%) for setting 2. In one patient, mTc-MEPs were elicitable in more muscles for setting (1) Amplitudes were not significantly different. Stimulation voltage could be increased ≥ 20 V in all 38 patients for setting 1 and in 10 (38.46%) for setting (2) Optimal ISI’s differed widely. Conclusion: We recommend using setting 1 when monitoring mTc-MEPs with supramaximal stimulation, after which an individualized ISI optimization can be performed. Moreover, when using supramaximal stimulation, short ISI’s (i.e. 1ms or 1.5ms) can be the optimal ISI for obtaining the highest mTc-MEP amplitude. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10877-022-00972-5. Springer Netherlands 2023-01-13 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10175431/ /pubmed/36635569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00972-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Dulfer, S. E. Lange, F. Sahinovic, M. M. Wapstra, F. H. Absalom, A. R. Faber, C. Groen, R. J.M. Drost, G. Feasibility and optimal choice of stimulation parameters for supramaximal stimulation of motor evoked potentials |
title | Feasibility and optimal choice of stimulation parameters for supramaximal stimulation of motor evoked potentials |
title_full | Feasibility and optimal choice of stimulation parameters for supramaximal stimulation of motor evoked potentials |
title_fullStr | Feasibility and optimal choice of stimulation parameters for supramaximal stimulation of motor evoked potentials |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility and optimal choice of stimulation parameters for supramaximal stimulation of motor evoked potentials |
title_short | Feasibility and optimal choice of stimulation parameters for supramaximal stimulation of motor evoked potentials |
title_sort | feasibility and optimal choice of stimulation parameters for supramaximal stimulation of motor evoked potentials |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10175431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36635569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00972-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dulferse feasibilityandoptimalchoiceofstimulationparametersforsupramaximalstimulationofmotorevokedpotentials AT langef feasibilityandoptimalchoiceofstimulationparametersforsupramaximalstimulationofmotorevokedpotentials AT sahinovicmm feasibilityandoptimalchoiceofstimulationparametersforsupramaximalstimulationofmotorevokedpotentials AT wapstrafh feasibilityandoptimalchoiceofstimulationparametersforsupramaximalstimulationofmotorevokedpotentials AT absalomar feasibilityandoptimalchoiceofstimulationparametersforsupramaximalstimulationofmotorevokedpotentials AT faberc feasibilityandoptimalchoiceofstimulationparametersforsupramaximalstimulationofmotorevokedpotentials AT groenrjm feasibilityandoptimalchoiceofstimulationparametersforsupramaximalstimulationofmotorevokedpotentials AT drostg feasibilityandoptimalchoiceofstimulationparametersforsupramaximalstimulationofmotorevokedpotentials |