Cargando…

Prospective Comparison of Thulium and Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Lithiasis

BACKGROUND: Lithotripsy with holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser is the current gold standard for treating stones of the upper urinary tract (UUT). The recently introduced thulium fiber laser (TFL) has the potential to be more efficient and as safe as Ho:YAG. OBJECTIVE: To compare the per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Delbarre, Bertrand, Baowaidan, Faris, Culty, Thibault, Khelfat, Lotfi, Brassier, Marie, Ferragu, Matthieu, Magnier, Alexandre, Secourgeon, Alexandre, Tariel, Francois, Lebdai, Souhil, Bigot, Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10175723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37187726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2023.02.012
_version_ 1785040272258760704
author Delbarre, Bertrand
Baowaidan, Faris
Culty, Thibault
Khelfat, Lotfi
Brassier, Marie
Ferragu, Matthieu
Magnier, Alexandre
Secourgeon, Alexandre
Tariel, Francois
Lebdai, Souhil
Bigot, Pierre
author_facet Delbarre, Bertrand
Baowaidan, Faris
Culty, Thibault
Khelfat, Lotfi
Brassier, Marie
Ferragu, Matthieu
Magnier, Alexandre
Secourgeon, Alexandre
Tariel, Francois
Lebdai, Souhil
Bigot, Pierre
author_sort Delbarre, Bertrand
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lithotripsy with holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser is the current gold standard for treating stones of the upper urinary tract (UUT). The recently introduced thulium fiber laser (TFL) has the potential to be more efficient and as safe as Ho:YAG. OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance and complications between Ho:YAG and TFL for UUT lithotripsy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prospective single-center study of 182 patients treated between February 2021 and February 2022. In a consecutive approach, laser lithotripsy was performed via ureteroscopy with Ho:YAG for 5 mo, and then with TFL for 5 mo. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Our primary outcome was stone-free (SF) status at 3 mo after ureteroscopy with Ho:YAG versus TFL lithotripsy. Secondary outcomes were complication rates and results regarding the cumulative stone size. Patients were followed at 3 mo with abdominal imaging (ultrasound or computed tomography). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The study cohort comprised 76 patients treated with Ho:YAG laser and 100 patients treated with TFL. Cumulative stone size was significantly higher in the TFL than in the Ho:YAG group (20.4 vs 14.8 mm; p = 0.01). SF status was similar in both groups (68.4% vs 72%; p = 0.06). Complication rates were comparable. In subgroup analysis, the SF rate was significantly higher (81.6% vs 62.5%; p = 0.04) and the operative time was shorter for stones measuring 1–2 cm, whereas the results were similar for stones <1 cm and >2 cm. The lack of randomization and single-center design are the main limitations of the study. CONCLUSIONS: TFL and Ho:YAG lithotripsy are comparable in terms of the SF rate and safety for the treatment of UUT lithiasis. According to our study, for a cumulative stone size of 1–2 cm, TFL is more effective than Ho:YAG. PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared the efficiency and safety of two laser types for the treatment of stones in the upper urinary tract. We found that stone-free status at 3 months did not significantly differ between the holmium and thulium lasers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10175723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101757232023-05-13 Prospective Comparison of Thulium and Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Lithiasis Delbarre, Bertrand Baowaidan, Faris Culty, Thibault Khelfat, Lotfi Brassier, Marie Ferragu, Matthieu Magnier, Alexandre Secourgeon, Alexandre Tariel, Francois Lebdai, Souhil Bigot, Pierre Eur Urol Open Sci Endo-Urology BACKGROUND: Lithotripsy with holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser is the current gold standard for treating stones of the upper urinary tract (UUT). The recently introduced thulium fiber laser (TFL) has the potential to be more efficient and as safe as Ho:YAG. OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance and complications between Ho:YAG and TFL for UUT lithotripsy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prospective single-center study of 182 patients treated between February 2021 and February 2022. In a consecutive approach, laser lithotripsy was performed via ureteroscopy with Ho:YAG for 5 mo, and then with TFL for 5 mo. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Our primary outcome was stone-free (SF) status at 3 mo after ureteroscopy with Ho:YAG versus TFL lithotripsy. Secondary outcomes were complication rates and results regarding the cumulative stone size. Patients were followed at 3 mo with abdominal imaging (ultrasound or computed tomography). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The study cohort comprised 76 patients treated with Ho:YAG laser and 100 patients treated with TFL. Cumulative stone size was significantly higher in the TFL than in the Ho:YAG group (20.4 vs 14.8 mm; p = 0.01). SF status was similar in both groups (68.4% vs 72%; p = 0.06). Complication rates were comparable. In subgroup analysis, the SF rate was significantly higher (81.6% vs 62.5%; p = 0.04) and the operative time was shorter for stones measuring 1–2 cm, whereas the results were similar for stones <1 cm and >2 cm. The lack of randomization and single-center design are the main limitations of the study. CONCLUSIONS: TFL and Ho:YAG lithotripsy are comparable in terms of the SF rate and safety for the treatment of UUT lithiasis. According to our study, for a cumulative stone size of 1–2 cm, TFL is more effective than Ho:YAG. PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared the efficiency and safety of two laser types for the treatment of stones in the upper urinary tract. We found that stone-free status at 3 months did not significantly differ between the holmium and thulium lasers. Elsevier 2023-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10175723/ /pubmed/37187726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2023.02.012 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Endo-Urology
Delbarre, Bertrand
Baowaidan, Faris
Culty, Thibault
Khelfat, Lotfi
Brassier, Marie
Ferragu, Matthieu
Magnier, Alexandre
Secourgeon, Alexandre
Tariel, Francois
Lebdai, Souhil
Bigot, Pierre
Prospective Comparison of Thulium and Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Lithiasis
title Prospective Comparison of Thulium and Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Lithiasis
title_full Prospective Comparison of Thulium and Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Lithiasis
title_fullStr Prospective Comparison of Thulium and Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Lithiasis
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Comparison of Thulium and Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Lithiasis
title_short Prospective Comparison of Thulium and Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Lithiasis
title_sort prospective comparison of thulium and holmium laser lithotripsy for the treatment of upper urinary tract lithiasis
topic Endo-Urology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10175723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37187726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2023.02.012
work_keys_str_mv AT delbarrebertrand prospectivecomparisonofthuliumandholmiumlaserlithotripsyforthetreatmentofupperurinarytractlithiasis
AT baowaidanfaris prospectivecomparisonofthuliumandholmiumlaserlithotripsyforthetreatmentofupperurinarytractlithiasis
AT cultythibault prospectivecomparisonofthuliumandholmiumlaserlithotripsyforthetreatmentofupperurinarytractlithiasis
AT khelfatlotfi prospectivecomparisonofthuliumandholmiumlaserlithotripsyforthetreatmentofupperurinarytractlithiasis
AT brassiermarie prospectivecomparisonofthuliumandholmiumlaserlithotripsyforthetreatmentofupperurinarytractlithiasis
AT ferragumatthieu prospectivecomparisonofthuliumandholmiumlaserlithotripsyforthetreatmentofupperurinarytractlithiasis
AT magnieralexandre prospectivecomparisonofthuliumandholmiumlaserlithotripsyforthetreatmentofupperurinarytractlithiasis
AT secourgeonalexandre prospectivecomparisonofthuliumandholmiumlaserlithotripsyforthetreatmentofupperurinarytractlithiasis
AT tarielfrancois prospectivecomparisonofthuliumandholmiumlaserlithotripsyforthetreatmentofupperurinarytractlithiasis
AT lebdaisouhil prospectivecomparisonofthuliumandholmiumlaserlithotripsyforthetreatmentofupperurinarytractlithiasis
AT bigotpierre prospectivecomparisonofthuliumandholmiumlaserlithotripsyforthetreatmentofupperurinarytractlithiasis