Cargando…

Carboplatin Induction Chemotherapy in Clinically Lymph Node–positive Bladder Cancer

BACKGROUND: There are currently no guideline recommendations regarding the treatment of cisplatin-ineligible, clinically lymph node–positive (cN+) bladder cancer (BCa). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the oncological efficacy of gemcitabine/carboplatin induction chemotherapy (IC) in comparison to cisplati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: von Deimling, Markus, Mertens, Laura S., van Rhijn, Bas W.G., Lotan, Yair, Spiess, Philippe E., Daneshmand, Siamak, Black, Peter C., Pallauf, Maximilian, D'Andrea, David, Moschini, Marco, Soria, Francesco, Del Giudice, Francesco, Afferi, Luca, Laukhtina, Ekaterina, Yanagisawa, Takafumi, Kawada, Tatsushi, Teoh, Jeremy Y.-C., Abufaraj, Mohammad, Ploussard, Guillaume, Roumiguié, Mathieu, Karakiewicz, Pierre I., Babjuk, Marko, Gontero, Paolo, Xylinas, Evanguelos, Rink, Michael, Shariat, Shahrokh F., Pradere, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10175724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37187719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2023.02.014
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: There are currently no guideline recommendations regarding the treatment of cisplatin-ineligible, clinically lymph node–positive (cN+) bladder cancer (BCa). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the oncological efficacy of gemcitabine/carboplatin induction chemotherapy (IC) in comparison to cisplatin-based regimens in cN+ BCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was an observational study of 369 patients with cT2–4 N1–3 M0 BCa. INTERVENTION: IC followed by consolidative radical cystectomy (RC). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoints were the pathological objective response (pOR; ypT0/Ta/Tis/T1 N0) rate and the pathological complete response (pCR; ypT0N0) rate. We applied 3:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce selection bias. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared across groups using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations between the treatment regimen and survival endpoints were tested in multivariable Cox regression analyses. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: After PSM, a cohort of 216 patients was available for analysis, of whom 162 received cisplatin-based IC and 54 gemcitabine/carboplatin IC. At RC, 54 patients (25%) had a pOR and 36 (17%) had a pCR. The 2-yr CSS was 59.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 51.9–69%) for patients who received cisplatin-based IC versus 38.8% (95% CI 26–57.9%) for those who received gemcitabine/carboplatin. For the pOR (p = 0.8), ypN0 status at RC (p = 0.5), and cN1 BCa subgroups (p = 0.7), there was no difference in CSS between cisplatin-based IC and gemcitabine/carboplatin. In the cN1 subgroup, treatment with gemcitabine/carboplatin was not associated with shorter OS (p = 0.2) or CSS (p = 0.1) on multivariable Cox regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Cisplatin-based IC seems to be superior to gemcitabine/carboplatin and should be the standard for cisplatin-eligible patients with cN+ BCa. Gemcitabine/carboplatin may be an alternative treatment for selected cisplatin-ineligible patients with cN+ BCa. In particular, selected cisplatin-ineligible patients with cN1 disease may benefit from gemcitabine/carboplatin IC. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this multicenter study, we found that selected patients with bladder cancer and clinical evidence of lymph node metastasis who cannot receive standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy before surgery to remove their bladder may benefit from chemotherapy with gemcitabine/carboplatin. Patients with a single lymph node metastasis may benefit the most.