Cargando…

Long-term assist device patients admitted to ICU: Tips and pitfalls

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy is well-established in the treatment of end-stage cardiac failure. Indications are bridge to transplant (BTT), bridge to candidacy (BTC), bridge to recovery (BTR), and destination therapy (DT). The durability and adverse event (AE) rate of LVADs have imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morshuis, Michiel, Fox, Hendrik, Lauenroth, Volker, Schramm, Rene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10175735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37188121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jointm.2022.10.004
_version_ 1785040275225182208
author Morshuis, Michiel
Fox, Hendrik
Lauenroth, Volker
Schramm, Rene
author_facet Morshuis, Michiel
Fox, Hendrik
Lauenroth, Volker
Schramm, Rene
author_sort Morshuis, Michiel
collection PubMed
description Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy is well-established in the treatment of end-stage cardiac failure. Indications are bridge to transplant (BTT), bridge to candidacy (BTC), bridge to recovery (BTR), and destination therapy (DT). The durability and adverse event (AE) rate of LVADs have improved over the years. However, due to donor shortage, the duration of support in the BTT population has increased tremendously; similarly, DT patients are on the device for a long time. Consequently, the number of readmissions of long-term LVAD patients has increased. In cases of severe AEs, intensive care unit (ICU) treatment can be necessary. Infectious complications are the most common AE. Furthermore, embolic or hemorrhagic strokes can occur due to foreign surfaces, acquired von Willebrand syndrome, and anticoagulation treatment. Another consequence of the coagulative status, in combination with the continuous flow, are gastrointestinal bleeding events. Moreover, in most patients, an isolated LVAD is implanted, and this involves the risk of late right heart failure. Adjustment of pump speed and optimization of the volume status can help solve this issue. Malignant arrhythmias, pre-existing or de novo after LVAD implantation, can be a life-threatening AE. Antiarrhythmic medical therapy or ablation are potential treatment options. As for specific LVADs, the Medtronic HeartWare™ ventricular assist device (HVAD) is not manufactured and distributed currently; however, 4000 patients are still on the device. Pump thrombosis can occur, wherein thrombolytic therapy is the first-line treatment option. Additionally, the HVAD can fail to restart after controller exchange due to technical issues, and precautions must be taken. The Momentum 3 trial showed superior survival without pump exchange or disabling stroke in patients treated with the HeartMate 3(Ⓡ) (HM3; Abbott, Abbott Park, IL, USA) device in comparison to the HeartMate II (HMII). However, in a few cases, a twisted graft or bio debris formation between the outflow graft and bend relief could be observed, causing outflow graft obstruction. Patients on LVADs are still heart failure patients, in many cases with comorbidities. Therefore, many situations can occur requiring ICU treatment. Ethical aspects should always be the focus when taking care of these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10175735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101757352023-05-13 Long-term assist device patients admitted to ICU: Tips and pitfalls Morshuis, Michiel Fox, Hendrik Lauenroth, Volker Schramm, Rene J Intensive Med Review Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy is well-established in the treatment of end-stage cardiac failure. Indications are bridge to transplant (BTT), bridge to candidacy (BTC), bridge to recovery (BTR), and destination therapy (DT). The durability and adverse event (AE) rate of LVADs have improved over the years. However, due to donor shortage, the duration of support in the BTT population has increased tremendously; similarly, DT patients are on the device for a long time. Consequently, the number of readmissions of long-term LVAD patients has increased. In cases of severe AEs, intensive care unit (ICU) treatment can be necessary. Infectious complications are the most common AE. Furthermore, embolic or hemorrhagic strokes can occur due to foreign surfaces, acquired von Willebrand syndrome, and anticoagulation treatment. Another consequence of the coagulative status, in combination with the continuous flow, are gastrointestinal bleeding events. Moreover, in most patients, an isolated LVAD is implanted, and this involves the risk of late right heart failure. Adjustment of pump speed and optimization of the volume status can help solve this issue. Malignant arrhythmias, pre-existing or de novo after LVAD implantation, can be a life-threatening AE. Antiarrhythmic medical therapy or ablation are potential treatment options. As for specific LVADs, the Medtronic HeartWare™ ventricular assist device (HVAD) is not manufactured and distributed currently; however, 4000 patients are still on the device. Pump thrombosis can occur, wherein thrombolytic therapy is the first-line treatment option. Additionally, the HVAD can fail to restart after controller exchange due to technical issues, and precautions must be taken. The Momentum 3 trial showed superior survival without pump exchange or disabling stroke in patients treated with the HeartMate 3(Ⓡ) (HM3; Abbott, Abbott Park, IL, USA) device in comparison to the HeartMate II (HMII). However, in a few cases, a twisted graft or bio debris formation between the outflow graft and bend relief could be observed, causing outflow graft obstruction. Patients on LVADs are still heart failure patients, in many cases with comorbidities. Therefore, many situations can occur requiring ICU treatment. Ethical aspects should always be the focus when taking care of these patients. Elsevier 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10175735/ /pubmed/37188121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jointm.2022.10.004 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Morshuis, Michiel
Fox, Hendrik
Lauenroth, Volker
Schramm, Rene
Long-term assist device patients admitted to ICU: Tips and pitfalls
title Long-term assist device patients admitted to ICU: Tips and pitfalls
title_full Long-term assist device patients admitted to ICU: Tips and pitfalls
title_fullStr Long-term assist device patients admitted to ICU: Tips and pitfalls
title_full_unstemmed Long-term assist device patients admitted to ICU: Tips and pitfalls
title_short Long-term assist device patients admitted to ICU: Tips and pitfalls
title_sort long-term assist device patients admitted to icu: tips and pitfalls
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10175735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37188121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jointm.2022.10.004
work_keys_str_mv AT morshuismichiel longtermassistdevicepatientsadmittedtoicutipsandpitfalls
AT foxhendrik longtermassistdevicepatientsadmittedtoicutipsandpitfalls
AT lauenrothvolker longtermassistdevicepatientsadmittedtoicutipsandpitfalls
AT schrammrene longtermassistdevicepatientsadmittedtoicutipsandpitfalls