Cargando…

Emergent microsurgical intervention for acute stroke after mechanical thrombectomy failure: a prospective study

BACKGROUND: Despite all the gains that have been achieved with endovascular mechanical thrombectomy revascularization and intravenous thrombolysis logistics since 2015, there is still a subgroup of patients with salvageable brain tissue for whom persistent emergent large vessel occlusion portends a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fiedler, Jiří, Roubec, Martin, Grubhoffer, Marek, Ostrý, Svatopluk, Procházka, Václav, Langová, Kateřina, Školoudík, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10176344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35428739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018643
_version_ 1785040413357244416
author Fiedler, Jiří
Roubec, Martin
Grubhoffer, Marek
Ostrý, Svatopluk
Procházka, Václav
Langová, Kateřina
Školoudík, David
author_facet Fiedler, Jiří
Roubec, Martin
Grubhoffer, Marek
Ostrý, Svatopluk
Procházka, Václav
Langová, Kateřina
Školoudík, David
author_sort Fiedler, Jiří
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite all the gains that have been achieved with endovascular mechanical thrombectomy revascularization and intravenous thrombolysis logistics since 2015, there is still a subgroup of patients with salvageable brain tissue for whom persistent emergent large vessel occlusion portends a catastrophic outcome. OBJECTIVE: To test the safety and efficacy of emergent microsurgical intervention in patients with acute ischemic stroke and symptomatic middle cerebral artery occlusion after failure of mechanical thrombectomy. METHODS: A prospective two-center cohort study was conducted. Patients with acute ischemic stroke and middle cerebral artery occlusion for whom recanalization failed at center 1 were randomly allocated to the microsurgical intervention group (MSIG) or control group 1 (CG1). All similar patients at center 2 were included in the control group 2 (CG2) with no surgical intervention. Microsurgical embolectomy and/or extracranial–intracranial bypass was performed in all MSIG patients at center 1. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were enrolled in the study: 22 at center 1 (12 allocated to the MSIG and 10 to the CG1) and 25 patients at center 2 (CG2). MSIG group patients showed a better clinical outcome on day 90 after the stroke, where a modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2 was reached in 7 (58.3%) of 12 patients compared with 1/10 (10.0%) patients in the CG1 and 3/12 (12.0%) in the CG2. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the potential for existing microsurgical techniques to provide good outcomes in 58% of microsurgically treated patients as a third-tier option.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10176344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101763442023-05-13 Emergent microsurgical intervention for acute stroke after mechanical thrombectomy failure: a prospective study Fiedler, Jiří Roubec, Martin Grubhoffer, Marek Ostrý, Svatopluk Procházka, Václav Langová, Kateřina Školoudík, David J Neurointerv Surg Ischemic Stroke BACKGROUND: Despite all the gains that have been achieved with endovascular mechanical thrombectomy revascularization and intravenous thrombolysis logistics since 2015, there is still a subgroup of patients with salvageable brain tissue for whom persistent emergent large vessel occlusion portends a catastrophic outcome. OBJECTIVE: To test the safety and efficacy of emergent microsurgical intervention in patients with acute ischemic stroke and symptomatic middle cerebral artery occlusion after failure of mechanical thrombectomy. METHODS: A prospective two-center cohort study was conducted. Patients with acute ischemic stroke and middle cerebral artery occlusion for whom recanalization failed at center 1 were randomly allocated to the microsurgical intervention group (MSIG) or control group 1 (CG1). All similar patients at center 2 were included in the control group 2 (CG2) with no surgical intervention. Microsurgical embolectomy and/or extracranial–intracranial bypass was performed in all MSIG patients at center 1. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were enrolled in the study: 22 at center 1 (12 allocated to the MSIG and 10 to the CG1) and 25 patients at center 2 (CG2). MSIG group patients showed a better clinical outcome on day 90 after the stroke, where a modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2 was reached in 7 (58.3%) of 12 patients compared with 1/10 (10.0%) patients in the CG1 and 3/12 (12.0%) in the CG2. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the potential for existing microsurgical techniques to provide good outcomes in 58% of microsurgically treated patients as a third-tier option. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05 2022-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10176344/ /pubmed/35428739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018643 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Ischemic Stroke
Fiedler, Jiří
Roubec, Martin
Grubhoffer, Marek
Ostrý, Svatopluk
Procházka, Václav
Langová, Kateřina
Školoudík, David
Emergent microsurgical intervention for acute stroke after mechanical thrombectomy failure: a prospective study
title Emergent microsurgical intervention for acute stroke after mechanical thrombectomy failure: a prospective study
title_full Emergent microsurgical intervention for acute stroke after mechanical thrombectomy failure: a prospective study
title_fullStr Emergent microsurgical intervention for acute stroke after mechanical thrombectomy failure: a prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Emergent microsurgical intervention for acute stroke after mechanical thrombectomy failure: a prospective study
title_short Emergent microsurgical intervention for acute stroke after mechanical thrombectomy failure: a prospective study
title_sort emergent microsurgical intervention for acute stroke after mechanical thrombectomy failure: a prospective study
topic Ischemic Stroke
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10176344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35428739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018643
work_keys_str_mv AT fiedlerjiri emergentmicrosurgicalinterventionforacutestrokeaftermechanicalthrombectomyfailureaprospectivestudy
AT roubecmartin emergentmicrosurgicalinterventionforacutestrokeaftermechanicalthrombectomyfailureaprospectivestudy
AT grubhoffermarek emergentmicrosurgicalinterventionforacutestrokeaftermechanicalthrombectomyfailureaprospectivestudy
AT ostrysvatopluk emergentmicrosurgicalinterventionforacutestrokeaftermechanicalthrombectomyfailureaprospectivestudy
AT prochazkavaclav emergentmicrosurgicalinterventionforacutestrokeaftermechanicalthrombectomyfailureaprospectivestudy
AT langovakaterina emergentmicrosurgicalinterventionforacutestrokeaftermechanicalthrombectomyfailureaprospectivestudy
AT skoloudikdavid emergentmicrosurgicalinterventionforacutestrokeaftermechanicalthrombectomyfailureaprospectivestudy
AT emergentmicrosurgicalinterventionforacutestrokeaftermechanicalthrombectomyfailureaprospectivestudy