Cargando…

Clinical practice in intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring in Poland: a point prevalence study in 31 Polish hospitals

BACKGROUND: Appropriate use of haemodynamic monitoring tools facilitates the adjustment of management to the patient’s individual needs. The aim of the study was to evaluate clinical practice in intraoperative monitoring of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgical procedures in selected hospitals in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Szczepańska, Anna J., Pluta, Michał P., Krzych, Łukasz J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10176527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32419439
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2020.95168
_version_ 1785040447475810304
author Szczepańska, Anna J.
Pluta, Michał P.
Krzych, Łukasz J.
author_facet Szczepańska, Anna J.
Pluta, Michał P.
Krzych, Łukasz J.
author_sort Szczepańska, Anna J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Appropriate use of haemodynamic monitoring tools facilitates the adjustment of management to the patient’s individual needs. The aim of the study was to evaluate clinical practice in intraoperative monitoring of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgical procedures in selected hospitals in Poland. METHODS: A point prevalence cross-sectional study was carried out among 587 adult patients of 31 Polish hospitals on April 5(th), 2018. The method of monitoring in relation to the estimated individual risk as well as to the type and mode of surgery was analysed. In addition, intraoperative fluid therapy and use of catecholamines were evaluated. RESULTS: Basic monitoring based on non-invasive arterial blood pressure measurements was implemented in 562 (96%) patients. More advanced methods of monitoring were used in 25 (4%) patients during moderate- (n = 16) and high-risk (n = 9) procedures, predominantly in high-risk patients (n = 16) and in university hospital settings (n = 21). Patients monitored basically received significantly higher amounts of fluids, i.e. 8.7 (IQR 6.1–12.6) vs. 6.1 (IQR 4.1–8.6) mL kg(-1) h(-1), respectively (P < 0.001). The most common vasoactive and inotropic drug was ephedrine, administered to 143 (24%) study patients in a dose of 15 mg (IQR 10–25) – without inter-group differences in categories of individual and procedure-related risk. CONCLUSIONS: The basic method of haemodynamic monitoring used in the study population was based on non-invasive arterial blood pressure measurements. The advanced tools of intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring were seldom used. Monitoring was not tailored to the perioperative risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10176527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101765272023-05-17 Clinical practice in intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring in Poland: a point prevalence study in 31 Polish hospitals Szczepańska, Anna J. Pluta, Michał P. Krzych, Łukasz J. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther Original and Clinical Articles BACKGROUND: Appropriate use of haemodynamic monitoring tools facilitates the adjustment of management to the patient’s individual needs. The aim of the study was to evaluate clinical practice in intraoperative monitoring of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgical procedures in selected hospitals in Poland. METHODS: A point prevalence cross-sectional study was carried out among 587 adult patients of 31 Polish hospitals on April 5(th), 2018. The method of monitoring in relation to the estimated individual risk as well as to the type and mode of surgery was analysed. In addition, intraoperative fluid therapy and use of catecholamines were evaluated. RESULTS: Basic monitoring based on non-invasive arterial blood pressure measurements was implemented in 562 (96%) patients. More advanced methods of monitoring were used in 25 (4%) patients during moderate- (n = 16) and high-risk (n = 9) procedures, predominantly in high-risk patients (n = 16) and in university hospital settings (n = 21). Patients monitored basically received significantly higher amounts of fluids, i.e. 8.7 (IQR 6.1–12.6) vs. 6.1 (IQR 4.1–8.6) mL kg(-1) h(-1), respectively (P < 0.001). The most common vasoactive and inotropic drug was ephedrine, administered to 143 (24%) study patients in a dose of 15 mg (IQR 10–25) – without inter-group differences in categories of individual and procedure-related risk. CONCLUSIONS: The basic method of haemodynamic monitoring used in the study population was based on non-invasive arterial blood pressure measurements. The advanced tools of intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring were seldom used. Monitoring was not tailored to the perioperative risk. Termedia Publishing House 2020-05-15 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10176527/ /pubmed/32419439 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2020.95168 Text en Copyright © Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) ), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original and Clinical Articles
Szczepańska, Anna J.
Pluta, Michał P.
Krzych, Łukasz J.
Clinical practice in intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring in Poland: a point prevalence study in 31 Polish hospitals
title Clinical practice in intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring in Poland: a point prevalence study in 31 Polish hospitals
title_full Clinical practice in intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring in Poland: a point prevalence study in 31 Polish hospitals
title_fullStr Clinical practice in intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring in Poland: a point prevalence study in 31 Polish hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Clinical practice in intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring in Poland: a point prevalence study in 31 Polish hospitals
title_short Clinical practice in intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring in Poland: a point prevalence study in 31 Polish hospitals
title_sort clinical practice in intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring in poland: a point prevalence study in 31 polish hospitals
topic Original and Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10176527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32419439
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2020.95168
work_keys_str_mv AT szczepanskaannaj clinicalpracticeinintraoperativehaemodynamicmonitoringinpolandapointprevalencestudyin31polishhospitals
AT plutamichałp clinicalpracticeinintraoperativehaemodynamicmonitoringinpolandapointprevalencestudyin31polishhospitals
AT krzychłukaszj clinicalpracticeinintraoperativehaemodynamicmonitoringinpolandapointprevalencestudyin31polishhospitals