Cargando…

Accuracy of minimal residual disease detection by circulating tumor DNA profiling in lung cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The sensitivity and specificity of minimal residual disease detected by circulating tumor DNA profiling (ctDNA MRD) in lung cancer, with particular attention to the distinction between landmark strategy and surveillance strategy, for predicting relapse in lung cancer patients after defin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhong, Ran, Gao, Rui, Fu, Wenhai, Li, Caichen, Huo, Zhenyu, Gao, Yuewen, Lu, Yi, Li, Feng, Ge, Fan, Tu, Hengjia, You, Zhixuan, He, Jianxing, Liang, Wenhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10176776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37173789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-02849-z
_version_ 1785040497124835328
author Zhong, Ran
Gao, Rui
Fu, Wenhai
Li, Caichen
Huo, Zhenyu
Gao, Yuewen
Lu, Yi
Li, Feng
Ge, Fan
Tu, Hengjia
You, Zhixuan
He, Jianxing
Liang, Wenhua
author_facet Zhong, Ran
Gao, Rui
Fu, Wenhai
Li, Caichen
Huo, Zhenyu
Gao, Yuewen
Lu, Yi
Li, Feng
Ge, Fan
Tu, Hengjia
You, Zhixuan
He, Jianxing
Liang, Wenhua
author_sort Zhong, Ran
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The sensitivity and specificity of minimal residual disease detected by circulating tumor DNA profiling (ctDNA MRD) in lung cancer, with particular attention to the distinction between landmark strategy and surveillance strategy, for predicting relapse in lung cancer patients after definitive therapy has yet to be determined. METHODS: The prognostic value of ctDNA MRD by landmark strategy and surveillance strategy was evaluated in a large cohort of patients with lung cancer who received definitive therapy using a systemic literature review and meta-analysis. Recurrence status stratified by ctDNA MRD result (positive or negative) was extracted as the clinical endpoint. We calculated the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curves, and pooled sensitivities and specificities. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on histological type and stage of lung cancer, types of definitive therapy, and ctDNA MRD detection methods (detection technology and strategy such as tumor-informed or tumor-agnostic). RESULTS: This systematic review and meta-analysis of 16 unique studies includes 1251 patients with lung cancer treated with definitive therapy. The specificity of ctDNA MRD in predicting recurrence is high (0.86–0.95) with moderate sensitivity (0.41–0.76), whether shortly after treatment or during the surveillance. The landmark strategy appears to be more specific but less sensitive than the surveillance strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that ctDNA MRD is a relatively promising biomarker for relapse prediction among lung cancer patients after definitive therapy, with a high specificity but suboptimal sensitivity, whether in landmark strategy or surveillance strategy. Although surveillance ctDNA MRD analysis decreases specificity compared with the landmark strategy, the decrease is minimal compared to the increase in sensitivity for relapse prediction of lung cancer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-023-02849-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10176776
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101767762023-05-13 Accuracy of minimal residual disease detection by circulating tumor DNA profiling in lung cancer: a meta-analysis Zhong, Ran Gao, Rui Fu, Wenhai Li, Caichen Huo, Zhenyu Gao, Yuewen Lu, Yi Li, Feng Ge, Fan Tu, Hengjia You, Zhixuan He, Jianxing Liang, Wenhua BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The sensitivity and specificity of minimal residual disease detected by circulating tumor DNA profiling (ctDNA MRD) in lung cancer, with particular attention to the distinction between landmark strategy and surveillance strategy, for predicting relapse in lung cancer patients after definitive therapy has yet to be determined. METHODS: The prognostic value of ctDNA MRD by landmark strategy and surveillance strategy was evaluated in a large cohort of patients with lung cancer who received definitive therapy using a systemic literature review and meta-analysis. Recurrence status stratified by ctDNA MRD result (positive or negative) was extracted as the clinical endpoint. We calculated the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curves, and pooled sensitivities and specificities. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on histological type and stage of lung cancer, types of definitive therapy, and ctDNA MRD detection methods (detection technology and strategy such as tumor-informed or tumor-agnostic). RESULTS: This systematic review and meta-analysis of 16 unique studies includes 1251 patients with lung cancer treated with definitive therapy. The specificity of ctDNA MRD in predicting recurrence is high (0.86–0.95) with moderate sensitivity (0.41–0.76), whether shortly after treatment or during the surveillance. The landmark strategy appears to be more specific but less sensitive than the surveillance strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that ctDNA MRD is a relatively promising biomarker for relapse prediction among lung cancer patients after definitive therapy, with a high specificity but suboptimal sensitivity, whether in landmark strategy or surveillance strategy. Although surveillance ctDNA MRD analysis decreases specificity compared with the landmark strategy, the decrease is minimal compared to the increase in sensitivity for relapse prediction of lung cancer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-023-02849-z. BioMed Central 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10176776/ /pubmed/37173789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-02849-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhong, Ran
Gao, Rui
Fu, Wenhai
Li, Caichen
Huo, Zhenyu
Gao, Yuewen
Lu, Yi
Li, Feng
Ge, Fan
Tu, Hengjia
You, Zhixuan
He, Jianxing
Liang, Wenhua
Accuracy of minimal residual disease detection by circulating tumor DNA profiling in lung cancer: a meta-analysis
title Accuracy of minimal residual disease detection by circulating tumor DNA profiling in lung cancer: a meta-analysis
title_full Accuracy of minimal residual disease detection by circulating tumor DNA profiling in lung cancer: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Accuracy of minimal residual disease detection by circulating tumor DNA profiling in lung cancer: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of minimal residual disease detection by circulating tumor DNA profiling in lung cancer: a meta-analysis
title_short Accuracy of minimal residual disease detection by circulating tumor DNA profiling in lung cancer: a meta-analysis
title_sort accuracy of minimal residual disease detection by circulating tumor dna profiling in lung cancer: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10176776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37173789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-02849-z
work_keys_str_mv AT zhongran accuracyofminimalresidualdiseasedetectionbycirculatingtumordnaprofilinginlungcancerametaanalysis
AT gaorui accuracyofminimalresidualdiseasedetectionbycirculatingtumordnaprofilinginlungcancerametaanalysis
AT fuwenhai accuracyofminimalresidualdiseasedetectionbycirculatingtumordnaprofilinginlungcancerametaanalysis
AT licaichen accuracyofminimalresidualdiseasedetectionbycirculatingtumordnaprofilinginlungcancerametaanalysis
AT huozhenyu accuracyofminimalresidualdiseasedetectionbycirculatingtumordnaprofilinginlungcancerametaanalysis
AT gaoyuewen accuracyofminimalresidualdiseasedetectionbycirculatingtumordnaprofilinginlungcancerametaanalysis
AT luyi accuracyofminimalresidualdiseasedetectionbycirculatingtumordnaprofilinginlungcancerametaanalysis
AT lifeng accuracyofminimalresidualdiseasedetectionbycirculatingtumordnaprofilinginlungcancerametaanalysis
AT gefan accuracyofminimalresidualdiseasedetectionbycirculatingtumordnaprofilinginlungcancerametaanalysis
AT tuhengjia accuracyofminimalresidualdiseasedetectionbycirculatingtumordnaprofilinginlungcancerametaanalysis
AT youzhixuan accuracyofminimalresidualdiseasedetectionbycirculatingtumordnaprofilinginlungcancerametaanalysis
AT hejianxing accuracyofminimalresidualdiseasedetectionbycirculatingtumordnaprofilinginlungcancerametaanalysis
AT liangwenhua accuracyofminimalresidualdiseasedetectionbycirculatingtumordnaprofilinginlungcancerametaanalysis