Cargando…

EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Graft rejection and chronic CNI toxicity remain obstacles to organ transplant success. Current formulations of tacrolimus, such as Prograf® and Advagraf™, exhibit limitations in terms of pharmacokinetics and tolerability, related in part to suboptimal bioavailability. As dosing non-compl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wöhl, D. S., James, B., Götz, M., Brennfleck, F., Holub-Hayles, I., Mutzbauer, I., Baccar, S., Brunner, S. M., Geissler, E. K., Schlitt, H. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10176804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37170284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07344-7
_version_ 1785040502331015168
author Wöhl, D. S.
James, B.
Götz, M.
Brennfleck, F.
Holub-Hayles, I.
Mutzbauer, I.
Baccar, S.
Brunner, S. M.
Geissler, E. K.
Schlitt, H. J.
author_facet Wöhl, D. S.
James, B.
Götz, M.
Brennfleck, F.
Holub-Hayles, I.
Mutzbauer, I.
Baccar, S.
Brunner, S. M.
Geissler, E. K.
Schlitt, H. J.
author_sort Wöhl, D. S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Graft rejection and chronic CNI toxicity remain obstacles to organ transplant success. Current formulations of tacrolimus, such as Prograf® and Advagraf™, exhibit limitations in terms of pharmacokinetics and tolerability, related in part to suboptimal bioavailability. As dosing non-compliance can result in graft rejection, the once daily formulation of tacrolimus, Advagraf™, was developed (vs 2x/day Prograf®). Benefits of Advagraf™ are counterbalanced by delayed achievement of therapeutic trough levels and need for up to 50% higher doses to maintain Prograf®-equivalent troughs. Envarsus® is also a prolonged-release once-daily tacrolimus formulation, developed using MeltDose™ drug-delivery technology to increase drug bioavailability; improved bioavailability results in low patient drug absorption variability and less pronounced peak-to-trough fluctuations. In phase III de novo kidney transplant studies, Envarsus® proved non-inferior to twice-daily tacrolimus; however, no phase IV studies show superiority of Envarsus® vs Advagraf™ in de novo liver transplant (LTx) recipients. METHODS: The EnGraft compares bioavailability and tests superiority of Envarsus® (test arm) versus Advagraf™ (comparator arm) in de novo LTx recipients. A total of 268 patients from 15 German transplant centres will be randomised 1:1 within 14 days post-LTx. The primary endpoint is dose-normalised trough level (C/D ratio) measured 12 weeks after randomisation. Secondary endpoints include the number of dose adjustments, time to reach first defined trough level and incidence of graft rejections. Additionally, clinical and laboratory parameters will be assessed over a 3-year period. DISCUSSION: C/D ratio is an estimate for tacrolimus bioavailability. Improving bioavailability and increasing C/D ratio using Envarsus could reduce renal dysfunction and other tacrolimus-related toxicities; previous trials have shown that a higher C/D ratio (i.e. slower tacrolimus metabolism) is not only associated with improved renal function but also linked to reduced neurotoxic side effects. A higher C/D ratio could improve clinical outcomes for LTx recipients; EnGraft has begun, with one third of patients recruited by January 2022. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial has been registered (4 May 2020) in the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT-Nummer: 2020–000796-20. Additionally, this trial has been registered (22 January 2021) at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04720326. The trial received a favourable opinion from the concerned lead ethics committee at the University of Regensburg, under the reference 20–1842-112.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10176804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101768042023-05-13 EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients Wöhl, D. S. James, B. Götz, M. Brennfleck, F. Holub-Hayles, I. Mutzbauer, I. Baccar, S. Brunner, S. M. Geissler, E. K. Schlitt, H. J. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Graft rejection and chronic CNI toxicity remain obstacles to organ transplant success. Current formulations of tacrolimus, such as Prograf® and Advagraf™, exhibit limitations in terms of pharmacokinetics and tolerability, related in part to suboptimal bioavailability. As dosing non-compliance can result in graft rejection, the once daily formulation of tacrolimus, Advagraf™, was developed (vs 2x/day Prograf®). Benefits of Advagraf™ are counterbalanced by delayed achievement of therapeutic trough levels and need for up to 50% higher doses to maintain Prograf®-equivalent troughs. Envarsus® is also a prolonged-release once-daily tacrolimus formulation, developed using MeltDose™ drug-delivery technology to increase drug bioavailability; improved bioavailability results in low patient drug absorption variability and less pronounced peak-to-trough fluctuations. In phase III de novo kidney transplant studies, Envarsus® proved non-inferior to twice-daily tacrolimus; however, no phase IV studies show superiority of Envarsus® vs Advagraf™ in de novo liver transplant (LTx) recipients. METHODS: The EnGraft compares bioavailability and tests superiority of Envarsus® (test arm) versus Advagraf™ (comparator arm) in de novo LTx recipients. A total of 268 patients from 15 German transplant centres will be randomised 1:1 within 14 days post-LTx. The primary endpoint is dose-normalised trough level (C/D ratio) measured 12 weeks after randomisation. Secondary endpoints include the number of dose adjustments, time to reach first defined trough level and incidence of graft rejections. Additionally, clinical and laboratory parameters will be assessed over a 3-year period. DISCUSSION: C/D ratio is an estimate for tacrolimus bioavailability. Improving bioavailability and increasing C/D ratio using Envarsus could reduce renal dysfunction and other tacrolimus-related toxicities; previous trials have shown that a higher C/D ratio (i.e. slower tacrolimus metabolism) is not only associated with improved renal function but also linked to reduced neurotoxic side effects. A higher C/D ratio could improve clinical outcomes for LTx recipients; EnGraft has begun, with one third of patients recruited by January 2022. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial has been registered (4 May 2020) in the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT-Nummer: 2020–000796-20. Additionally, this trial has been registered (22 January 2021) at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04720326. The trial received a favourable opinion from the concerned lead ethics committee at the University of Regensburg, under the reference 20–1842-112. BioMed Central 2023-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10176804/ /pubmed/37170284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07344-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Wöhl, D. S.
James, B.
Götz, M.
Brennfleck, F.
Holub-Hayles, I.
Mutzbauer, I.
Baccar, S.
Brunner, S. M.
Geissler, E. K.
Schlitt, H. J.
EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients
title EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients
title_full EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients
title_fullStr EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients
title_full_unstemmed EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients
title_short EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients
title_sort engraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of envarsus® versus advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10176804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37170284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07344-7
work_keys_str_mv AT wohlds engraftamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedtwoarmsuperioritystudyprotocoltoassessbioavailabilityandpracticabilityofenvarsusversusadvagrafinlivertransplantrecipients
AT jamesb engraftamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedtwoarmsuperioritystudyprotocoltoassessbioavailabilityandpracticabilityofenvarsusversusadvagrafinlivertransplantrecipients
AT gotzm engraftamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedtwoarmsuperioritystudyprotocoltoassessbioavailabilityandpracticabilityofenvarsusversusadvagrafinlivertransplantrecipients
AT brennfleckf engraftamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedtwoarmsuperioritystudyprotocoltoassessbioavailabilityandpracticabilityofenvarsusversusadvagrafinlivertransplantrecipients
AT holubhaylesi engraftamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedtwoarmsuperioritystudyprotocoltoassessbioavailabilityandpracticabilityofenvarsusversusadvagrafinlivertransplantrecipients
AT mutzbaueri engraftamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedtwoarmsuperioritystudyprotocoltoassessbioavailabilityandpracticabilityofenvarsusversusadvagrafinlivertransplantrecipients
AT baccars engraftamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedtwoarmsuperioritystudyprotocoltoassessbioavailabilityandpracticabilityofenvarsusversusadvagrafinlivertransplantrecipients
AT brunnersm engraftamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedtwoarmsuperioritystudyprotocoltoassessbioavailabilityandpracticabilityofenvarsusversusadvagrafinlivertransplantrecipients
AT geisslerek engraftamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedtwoarmsuperioritystudyprotocoltoassessbioavailabilityandpracticabilityofenvarsusversusadvagrafinlivertransplantrecipients
AT schlitthj engraftamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedtwoarmsuperioritystudyprotocoltoassessbioavailabilityandpracticabilityofenvarsusversusadvagrafinlivertransplantrecipients
AT engraftamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedtwoarmsuperioritystudyprotocoltoassessbioavailabilityandpracticabilityofenvarsusversusadvagrafinlivertransplantrecipients