Cargando…
EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients
BACKGROUND: Graft rejection and chronic CNI toxicity remain obstacles to organ transplant success. Current formulations of tacrolimus, such as Prograf® and Advagraf™, exhibit limitations in terms of pharmacokinetics and tolerability, related in part to suboptimal bioavailability. As dosing non-compl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10176804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37170284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07344-7 |
_version_ | 1785040502331015168 |
---|---|
author | Wöhl, D. S. James, B. Götz, M. Brennfleck, F. Holub-Hayles, I. Mutzbauer, I. Baccar, S. Brunner, S. M. Geissler, E. K. Schlitt, H. J. |
author_facet | Wöhl, D. S. James, B. Götz, M. Brennfleck, F. Holub-Hayles, I. Mutzbauer, I. Baccar, S. Brunner, S. M. Geissler, E. K. Schlitt, H. J. |
author_sort | Wöhl, D. S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Graft rejection and chronic CNI toxicity remain obstacles to organ transplant success. Current formulations of tacrolimus, such as Prograf® and Advagraf™, exhibit limitations in terms of pharmacokinetics and tolerability, related in part to suboptimal bioavailability. As dosing non-compliance can result in graft rejection, the once daily formulation of tacrolimus, Advagraf™, was developed (vs 2x/day Prograf®). Benefits of Advagraf™ are counterbalanced by delayed achievement of therapeutic trough levels and need for up to 50% higher doses to maintain Prograf®-equivalent troughs. Envarsus® is also a prolonged-release once-daily tacrolimus formulation, developed using MeltDose™ drug-delivery technology to increase drug bioavailability; improved bioavailability results in low patient drug absorption variability and less pronounced peak-to-trough fluctuations. In phase III de novo kidney transplant studies, Envarsus® proved non-inferior to twice-daily tacrolimus; however, no phase IV studies show superiority of Envarsus® vs Advagraf™ in de novo liver transplant (LTx) recipients. METHODS: The EnGraft compares bioavailability and tests superiority of Envarsus® (test arm) versus Advagraf™ (comparator arm) in de novo LTx recipients. A total of 268 patients from 15 German transplant centres will be randomised 1:1 within 14 days post-LTx. The primary endpoint is dose-normalised trough level (C/D ratio) measured 12 weeks after randomisation. Secondary endpoints include the number of dose adjustments, time to reach first defined trough level and incidence of graft rejections. Additionally, clinical and laboratory parameters will be assessed over a 3-year period. DISCUSSION: C/D ratio is an estimate for tacrolimus bioavailability. Improving bioavailability and increasing C/D ratio using Envarsus could reduce renal dysfunction and other tacrolimus-related toxicities; previous trials have shown that a higher C/D ratio (i.e. slower tacrolimus metabolism) is not only associated with improved renal function but also linked to reduced neurotoxic side effects. A higher C/D ratio could improve clinical outcomes for LTx recipients; EnGraft has begun, with one third of patients recruited by January 2022. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial has been registered (4 May 2020) in the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT-Nummer: 2020–000796-20. Additionally, this trial has been registered (22 January 2021) at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04720326. The trial received a favourable opinion from the concerned lead ethics committee at the University of Regensburg, under the reference 20–1842-112. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10176804 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101768042023-05-13 EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients Wöhl, D. S. James, B. Götz, M. Brennfleck, F. Holub-Hayles, I. Mutzbauer, I. Baccar, S. Brunner, S. M. Geissler, E. K. Schlitt, H. J. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Graft rejection and chronic CNI toxicity remain obstacles to organ transplant success. Current formulations of tacrolimus, such as Prograf® and Advagraf™, exhibit limitations in terms of pharmacokinetics and tolerability, related in part to suboptimal bioavailability. As dosing non-compliance can result in graft rejection, the once daily formulation of tacrolimus, Advagraf™, was developed (vs 2x/day Prograf®). Benefits of Advagraf™ are counterbalanced by delayed achievement of therapeutic trough levels and need for up to 50% higher doses to maintain Prograf®-equivalent troughs. Envarsus® is also a prolonged-release once-daily tacrolimus formulation, developed using MeltDose™ drug-delivery technology to increase drug bioavailability; improved bioavailability results in low patient drug absorption variability and less pronounced peak-to-trough fluctuations. In phase III de novo kidney transplant studies, Envarsus® proved non-inferior to twice-daily tacrolimus; however, no phase IV studies show superiority of Envarsus® vs Advagraf™ in de novo liver transplant (LTx) recipients. METHODS: The EnGraft compares bioavailability and tests superiority of Envarsus® (test arm) versus Advagraf™ (comparator arm) in de novo LTx recipients. A total of 268 patients from 15 German transplant centres will be randomised 1:1 within 14 days post-LTx. The primary endpoint is dose-normalised trough level (C/D ratio) measured 12 weeks after randomisation. Secondary endpoints include the number of dose adjustments, time to reach first defined trough level and incidence of graft rejections. Additionally, clinical and laboratory parameters will be assessed over a 3-year period. DISCUSSION: C/D ratio is an estimate for tacrolimus bioavailability. Improving bioavailability and increasing C/D ratio using Envarsus could reduce renal dysfunction and other tacrolimus-related toxicities; previous trials have shown that a higher C/D ratio (i.e. slower tacrolimus metabolism) is not only associated with improved renal function but also linked to reduced neurotoxic side effects. A higher C/D ratio could improve clinical outcomes for LTx recipients; EnGraft has begun, with one third of patients recruited by January 2022. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial has been registered (4 May 2020) in the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT-Nummer: 2020–000796-20. Additionally, this trial has been registered (22 January 2021) at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04720326. The trial received a favourable opinion from the concerned lead ethics committee at the University of Regensburg, under the reference 20–1842-112. BioMed Central 2023-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10176804/ /pubmed/37170284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07344-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Wöhl, D. S. James, B. Götz, M. Brennfleck, F. Holub-Hayles, I. Mutzbauer, I. Baccar, S. Brunner, S. M. Geissler, E. K. Schlitt, H. J. EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients |
title | EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients |
title_full | EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients |
title_fullStr | EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients |
title_full_unstemmed | EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients |
title_short | EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients |
title_sort | engraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of envarsus® versus advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10176804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37170284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07344-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wohlds engraftamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedtwoarmsuperioritystudyprotocoltoassessbioavailabilityandpracticabilityofenvarsusversusadvagrafinlivertransplantrecipients AT jamesb engraftamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedtwoarmsuperioritystudyprotocoltoassessbioavailabilityandpracticabilityofenvarsusversusadvagrafinlivertransplantrecipients AT gotzm engraftamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedtwoarmsuperioritystudyprotocoltoassessbioavailabilityandpracticabilityofenvarsusversusadvagrafinlivertransplantrecipients AT brennfleckf engraftamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedtwoarmsuperioritystudyprotocoltoassessbioavailabilityandpracticabilityofenvarsusversusadvagrafinlivertransplantrecipients AT holubhaylesi engraftamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedtwoarmsuperioritystudyprotocoltoassessbioavailabilityandpracticabilityofenvarsusversusadvagrafinlivertransplantrecipients AT mutzbaueri engraftamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedtwoarmsuperioritystudyprotocoltoassessbioavailabilityandpracticabilityofenvarsusversusadvagrafinlivertransplantrecipients AT baccars engraftamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedtwoarmsuperioritystudyprotocoltoassessbioavailabilityandpracticabilityofenvarsusversusadvagrafinlivertransplantrecipients AT brunnersm engraftamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedtwoarmsuperioritystudyprotocoltoassessbioavailabilityandpracticabilityofenvarsusversusadvagrafinlivertransplantrecipients AT geisslerek engraftamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedtwoarmsuperioritystudyprotocoltoassessbioavailabilityandpracticabilityofenvarsusversusadvagrafinlivertransplantrecipients AT schlitthj engraftamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedtwoarmsuperioritystudyprotocoltoassessbioavailabilityandpracticabilityofenvarsusversusadvagrafinlivertransplantrecipients AT engraftamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedtwoarmsuperioritystudyprotocoltoassessbioavailabilityandpracticabilityofenvarsusversusadvagrafinlivertransplantrecipients |