Cargando…

Influence of a new abutment design concept on the biomechanics of peri-implant bone, implant components, and microgap formation: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND: A new two-piece abutment design consisting of an upper prosthetic component and tissue-level base has been introduced; however, the biomechanical behavior of such a design has not been documented. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a two-piece abutment design on the stress in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nie, Huimin, Tang, Yantai, Yang, Yan, Wu, Weijie, Zhou, Wenjuan, Liu, Zhonghao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10176806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37170117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02989-x
_version_ 1785040502826991616
author Nie, Huimin
Tang, Yantai
Yang, Yan
Wu, Weijie
Zhou, Wenjuan
Liu, Zhonghao
author_facet Nie, Huimin
Tang, Yantai
Yang, Yan
Wu, Weijie
Zhou, Wenjuan
Liu, Zhonghao
author_sort Nie, Huimin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A new two-piece abutment design consisting of an upper prosthetic component and tissue-level base has been introduced; however, the biomechanical behavior of such a design has not been documented. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a two-piece abutment design on the stress in the implant components and surrounding bone, as well as its influence on microgap formation. METHODS: To simulate the implant models in the mandibular left first molar area, we established nine experimental groups that included three bone qualities (type II, III, and IV) and three implant–abutment designs (internal bone level, tissue level, and a two-piece design). After the screw was preloaded, the maximum occlusal (600 N) and masticatory (225 N) forces were established. Finite element analysis was performed to analyze the maximum and minimum principal stresses on the peri-implant bone; the von Mises stresses in the implants, abutments, bases, and screws, and the microgaps at the implant–abutment, implant–base, and base–abutment interfaces. RESULTS: For all three loading methods, the two-piece abutment design and bone-level connection exhibited similarities in the maximum and minimum principal stresses in the peri-implant bone. The von Mises stresses in both screws and bases were greater for the two-piece design than for the other connection types. The smallest microgap was detected in the tissue-level connection; the largest was observed at the implant–base interface in the two-piece design. CONCLUSIONS: The present study found no evidence that the abutment design exerts a significant effect on peri-implant bone stress. However, the mechanical effects associated with the base and screws should be noted when using a two-piece abutment design. The two-piece abutment design also had no advantage in eliminating the microgap.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10176806
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101768062023-05-13 Influence of a new abutment design concept on the biomechanics of peri-implant bone, implant components, and microgap formation: a finite element analysis Nie, Huimin Tang, Yantai Yang, Yan Wu, Weijie Zhou, Wenjuan Liu, Zhonghao BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: A new two-piece abutment design consisting of an upper prosthetic component and tissue-level base has been introduced; however, the biomechanical behavior of such a design has not been documented. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a two-piece abutment design on the stress in the implant components and surrounding bone, as well as its influence on microgap formation. METHODS: To simulate the implant models in the mandibular left first molar area, we established nine experimental groups that included three bone qualities (type II, III, and IV) and three implant–abutment designs (internal bone level, tissue level, and a two-piece design). After the screw was preloaded, the maximum occlusal (600 N) and masticatory (225 N) forces were established. Finite element analysis was performed to analyze the maximum and minimum principal stresses on the peri-implant bone; the von Mises stresses in the implants, abutments, bases, and screws, and the microgaps at the implant–abutment, implant–base, and base–abutment interfaces. RESULTS: For all three loading methods, the two-piece abutment design and bone-level connection exhibited similarities in the maximum and minimum principal stresses in the peri-implant bone. The von Mises stresses in both screws and bases were greater for the two-piece design than for the other connection types. The smallest microgap was detected in the tissue-level connection; the largest was observed at the implant–base interface in the two-piece design. CONCLUSIONS: The present study found no evidence that the abutment design exerts a significant effect on peri-implant bone stress. However, the mechanical effects associated with the base and screws should be noted when using a two-piece abutment design. The two-piece abutment design also had no advantage in eliminating the microgap. BioMed Central 2023-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10176806/ /pubmed/37170117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02989-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Nie, Huimin
Tang, Yantai
Yang, Yan
Wu, Weijie
Zhou, Wenjuan
Liu, Zhonghao
Influence of a new abutment design concept on the biomechanics of peri-implant bone, implant components, and microgap formation: a finite element analysis
title Influence of a new abutment design concept on the biomechanics of peri-implant bone, implant components, and microgap formation: a finite element analysis
title_full Influence of a new abutment design concept on the biomechanics of peri-implant bone, implant components, and microgap formation: a finite element analysis
title_fullStr Influence of a new abutment design concept on the biomechanics of peri-implant bone, implant components, and microgap formation: a finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Influence of a new abutment design concept on the biomechanics of peri-implant bone, implant components, and microgap formation: a finite element analysis
title_short Influence of a new abutment design concept on the biomechanics of peri-implant bone, implant components, and microgap formation: a finite element analysis
title_sort influence of a new abutment design concept on the biomechanics of peri-implant bone, implant components, and microgap formation: a finite element analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10176806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37170117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02989-x
work_keys_str_mv AT niehuimin influenceofanewabutmentdesignconceptonthebiomechanicsofperiimplantboneimplantcomponentsandmicrogapformationafiniteelementanalysis
AT tangyantai influenceofanewabutmentdesignconceptonthebiomechanicsofperiimplantboneimplantcomponentsandmicrogapformationafiniteelementanalysis
AT yangyan influenceofanewabutmentdesignconceptonthebiomechanicsofperiimplantboneimplantcomponentsandmicrogapformationafiniteelementanalysis
AT wuweijie influenceofanewabutmentdesignconceptonthebiomechanicsofperiimplantboneimplantcomponentsandmicrogapformationafiniteelementanalysis
AT zhouwenjuan influenceofanewabutmentdesignconceptonthebiomechanicsofperiimplantboneimplantcomponentsandmicrogapformationafiniteelementanalysis
AT liuzhonghao influenceofanewabutmentdesignconceptonthebiomechanicsofperiimplantboneimplantcomponentsandmicrogapformationafiniteelementanalysis