Cargando…

Central venous stenosis after subclavian versus internal jugular dialysis catheter insertion (CITES) in adults in need of a temporary central dialysis catheter: study protocol for a two-arm, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The right internal jugular vein is currently recommended for temporary central dialysis catheters (tCDC) based on results from previous studies showing a lower incidence of central vein stenosis compared to the subclavian vein. Data is however conflicting, and there are several advantage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borgquist, Ola, Naddi, Leila, Božović, Gracijela, Hellberg, Matthias, Annborn, Martin, Sjövall, Fredrik, Adrian, Maria, Hettinger, Eva, Sjöberg, Pia, Kander, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10176902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37173715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07350-9
_version_ 1785040517936971776
author Borgquist, Ola
Naddi, Leila
Božović, Gracijela
Hellberg, Matthias
Annborn, Martin
Sjövall, Fredrik
Adrian, Maria
Hettinger, Eva
Sjöberg, Pia
Kander, Thomas
author_facet Borgquist, Ola
Naddi, Leila
Božović, Gracijela
Hellberg, Matthias
Annborn, Martin
Sjövall, Fredrik
Adrian, Maria
Hettinger, Eva
Sjöberg, Pia
Kander, Thomas
author_sort Borgquist, Ola
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The right internal jugular vein is currently recommended for temporary central dialysis catheters (tCDC) based on results from previous studies showing a lower incidence of central vein stenosis compared to the subclavian vein. Data is however conflicting, and there are several advantages when the subclavian route is used for tCDCs. This prospective, controlled, randomised, non-inferiority study aims to compare the incidence of post-catheterisation central vein stenosis between the right subclavian and the right internal jugular routes. METHODS: Adult patients needing a tCDC will be included from several hospitals and randomised to either subclavian or internal jugular vein catheterisation with a silicone tCDC. Inclusion continues until 50 patients in each group have undergone a follow-up CT venography. The primary outcome is the incidence of post-catheterisation central vein stenosis detected by a CT venography performed 1.5 to 3 months after removal of the tCDC. Secondary outcomes include between-group comparisons of (I) the patients’ experience of discomfort and pain, (II) any dysfunction of the tCDC during use, (III) catheterisation success rate and (IV) the number of mechanical complications. Furthermore, the ability to detect central vein stenosis by a focused ultrasound examination will be evaluated using the CT venography as golden standard. DISCUSSION: The use of the subclavian route for tCDC placement has largely been abandoned due to older studies with various methodological issues. However, the subclavian route offers several advantages for the patient. This trial is designed to provide robust data on the incidence of central vein stenosis after silicone tCDC insertion in the era of ultrasound-guided catheterisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT04871568. Prospectively registered on May 4, 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07350-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10176902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101769022023-05-13 Central venous stenosis after subclavian versus internal jugular dialysis catheter insertion (CITES) in adults in need of a temporary central dialysis catheter: study protocol for a two-arm, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial Borgquist, Ola Naddi, Leila Božović, Gracijela Hellberg, Matthias Annborn, Martin Sjövall, Fredrik Adrian, Maria Hettinger, Eva Sjöberg, Pia Kander, Thomas Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The right internal jugular vein is currently recommended for temporary central dialysis catheters (tCDC) based on results from previous studies showing a lower incidence of central vein stenosis compared to the subclavian vein. Data is however conflicting, and there are several advantages when the subclavian route is used for tCDCs. This prospective, controlled, randomised, non-inferiority study aims to compare the incidence of post-catheterisation central vein stenosis between the right subclavian and the right internal jugular routes. METHODS: Adult patients needing a tCDC will be included from several hospitals and randomised to either subclavian or internal jugular vein catheterisation with a silicone tCDC. Inclusion continues until 50 patients in each group have undergone a follow-up CT venography. The primary outcome is the incidence of post-catheterisation central vein stenosis detected by a CT venography performed 1.5 to 3 months after removal of the tCDC. Secondary outcomes include between-group comparisons of (I) the patients’ experience of discomfort and pain, (II) any dysfunction of the tCDC during use, (III) catheterisation success rate and (IV) the number of mechanical complications. Furthermore, the ability to detect central vein stenosis by a focused ultrasound examination will be evaluated using the CT venography as golden standard. DISCUSSION: The use of the subclavian route for tCDC placement has largely been abandoned due to older studies with various methodological issues. However, the subclavian route offers several advantages for the patient. This trial is designed to provide robust data on the incidence of central vein stenosis after silicone tCDC insertion in the era of ultrasound-guided catheterisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT04871568. Prospectively registered on May 4, 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07350-9. BioMed Central 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10176902/ /pubmed/37173715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07350-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Borgquist, Ola
Naddi, Leila
Božović, Gracijela
Hellberg, Matthias
Annborn, Martin
Sjövall, Fredrik
Adrian, Maria
Hettinger, Eva
Sjöberg, Pia
Kander, Thomas
Central venous stenosis after subclavian versus internal jugular dialysis catheter insertion (CITES) in adults in need of a temporary central dialysis catheter: study protocol for a two-arm, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
title Central venous stenosis after subclavian versus internal jugular dialysis catheter insertion (CITES) in adults in need of a temporary central dialysis catheter: study protocol for a two-arm, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
title_full Central venous stenosis after subclavian versus internal jugular dialysis catheter insertion (CITES) in adults in need of a temporary central dialysis catheter: study protocol for a two-arm, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Central venous stenosis after subclavian versus internal jugular dialysis catheter insertion (CITES) in adults in need of a temporary central dialysis catheter: study protocol for a two-arm, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Central venous stenosis after subclavian versus internal jugular dialysis catheter insertion (CITES) in adults in need of a temporary central dialysis catheter: study protocol for a two-arm, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
title_short Central venous stenosis after subclavian versus internal jugular dialysis catheter insertion (CITES) in adults in need of a temporary central dialysis catheter: study protocol for a two-arm, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
title_sort central venous stenosis after subclavian versus internal jugular dialysis catheter insertion (cites) in adults in need of a temporary central dialysis catheter: study protocol for a two-arm, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10176902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37173715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07350-9
work_keys_str_mv AT borgquistola centralvenousstenosisaftersubclavianversusinternaljugulardialysiscatheterinsertioncitesinadultsinneedofatemporarycentraldialysiscatheterstudyprotocolforatwoarmparallelgroupnoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT naddileila centralvenousstenosisaftersubclavianversusinternaljugulardialysiscatheterinsertioncitesinadultsinneedofatemporarycentraldialysiscatheterstudyprotocolforatwoarmparallelgroupnoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bozovicgracijela centralvenousstenosisaftersubclavianversusinternaljugulardialysiscatheterinsertioncitesinadultsinneedofatemporarycentraldialysiscatheterstudyprotocolforatwoarmparallelgroupnoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hellbergmatthias centralvenousstenosisaftersubclavianversusinternaljugulardialysiscatheterinsertioncitesinadultsinneedofatemporarycentraldialysiscatheterstudyprotocolforatwoarmparallelgroupnoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT annbornmartin centralvenousstenosisaftersubclavianversusinternaljugulardialysiscatheterinsertioncitesinadultsinneedofatemporarycentraldialysiscatheterstudyprotocolforatwoarmparallelgroupnoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sjovallfredrik centralvenousstenosisaftersubclavianversusinternaljugulardialysiscatheterinsertioncitesinadultsinneedofatemporarycentraldialysiscatheterstudyprotocolforatwoarmparallelgroupnoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT adrianmaria centralvenousstenosisaftersubclavianversusinternaljugulardialysiscatheterinsertioncitesinadultsinneedofatemporarycentraldialysiscatheterstudyprotocolforatwoarmparallelgroupnoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hettingereva centralvenousstenosisaftersubclavianversusinternaljugulardialysiscatheterinsertioncitesinadultsinneedofatemporarycentraldialysiscatheterstudyprotocolforatwoarmparallelgroupnoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sjobergpia centralvenousstenosisaftersubclavianversusinternaljugulardialysiscatheterinsertioncitesinadultsinneedofatemporarycentraldialysiscatheterstudyprotocolforatwoarmparallelgroupnoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kanderthomas centralvenousstenosisaftersubclavianversusinternaljugulardialysiscatheterinsertioncitesinadultsinneedofatemporarycentraldialysiscatheterstudyprotocolforatwoarmparallelgroupnoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrial