Cargando…

Radiation Dose Reduction for Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using a Virtual Noniodine Algorithm on Photon-Counting Detector Computed-Tomography Phantom Data

Background: On the basis of the hypothesis that virtual noniodine (VNI)-based coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) is feasible at reduced radiation doses, this study assesses the impact of radiation dose reduction on the accuracy of this VNI algorithm on a photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT. Method...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fink, Nicola, Zsarnoczay, Emese, Schoepf, U. Joseph, O’Doherty, Jim, Griffith, Joseph P., Pinos, Daniel, Tesche, Christian, Ricke, Jens, Willemink, Martin J., Varga-Szemes, Akos, Emrich, Tilman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10177425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37174932
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13091540
Descripción
Sumario:Background: On the basis of the hypothesis that virtual noniodine (VNI)-based coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) is feasible at reduced radiation doses, this study assesses the impact of radiation dose reduction on the accuracy of this VNI algorithm on a photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT. Methods: In a systematic in vitro setting, a phantom for CACS simulating three chest sizes was scanned on a clinical PCD-CT. The standard radiation dose was chosen at volumetric CT dose indices (CTDI(Vol)) of 1.5, 3.3, 7.0 mGy for small, medium-sized, and large phantoms, and was gradually reduced by adjusting the tube current resulting in 100, 75, 50, and 25%, respectively. VNI images were reconstructed at 55 keV, quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR)1, and at 60 keV/QIR4, and evaluated regarding image quality (image noise (IN), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)), and CACS. All VNI results were compared to true noncontrast (TNC)-based CACS at 70 keV and standard radiation dose (reference). Results: IN(TNC) was significantly higher than IN(VNI), and IN(VNI) at 55 keV/QIR1 higher than at 60 keV/QIR4 (100% dose: 16.7 ± 1.9 vs. 12.8 ± 1.7 vs. 7.7 ± 0.9; p < 0.001 for every radiation dose). CNR(TNC) was higher than CNR(VNI), but it was better to use 60 keV/QIR4 (p < 0.001). CACS(VNI) showed strong correlation and agreement at every radiation dose (p < 0.001, r > 0.9, intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9). The coefficients of the variation in root-mean squared error were less than 10% and thus clinically nonrelevant for the CACS(VNI) of every radiation dose. Conclusion: This phantom study suggests that CACS(VNI) is feasible on PCD-CT, even at reduced radiation dose while maintaining image quality and CACS accuracy.