Cargando…
Feasibility, Reliability, and Safety of Remote Five Times Sit to Stand Test in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer
SIMPLE SUMMARY: The five times sit to stand (5STS) test is widely used to measure functional lower extremity strength. However, the psychometric properties of the 5STS test when performed remotely is unknown. This study determined the feasibility, reliability, and safety of the remote five times sit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10177509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37173899 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15092434 |
_version_ | 1785040655138947072 |
---|---|
author | Steffens, Daniel Pocovi, Natasha C. Bartyn, Jenna Delbaere, Kim Hancock, Mark J. Koh, Cherry Denehy, Linda van Schooten, Kimberley S. Solomon, Michael |
author_facet | Steffens, Daniel Pocovi, Natasha C. Bartyn, Jenna Delbaere, Kim Hancock, Mark J. Koh, Cherry Denehy, Linda van Schooten, Kimberley S. Solomon, Michael |
author_sort | Steffens, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: The five times sit to stand (5STS) test is widely used to measure functional lower extremity strength. However, the psychometric properties of the 5STS test when performed remotely is unknown. This study determined the feasibility, reliability, and safety of the remote five times sit to stand test (5STS) in 37 patients scheduled to undergo gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Participants completed the 5STS test both face-to-face and remotely, with the order randomised. The study provides supporting evidence that the remote 5STS test is feasible, reliable, and safe in patients with gastrointestinal cancer and can be used in both clinical and research settings. ABSTRACT: Background: To determine the feasibility, reliability, and safety of the remote five times sit to stand test (5STS) test in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Methods: Consecutive adult patients undergoing surgical treatment for lower gastrointestinal cancer at a major referral hospital in Sydney between July and November 2022 were included. Participants completed the 5STS test both face-to-face and remotely, with the order randomised. Outcomes included measures of feasibility, reliability, and safety. Results: Of fifty-five patients identified, seventeen (30.9%) were not interested, one (1.8%) had no internet coverage, and thirty-seven (67.3%) consented and completed both 5STS tests. The mean (SD) time taken to complete the face-to-face and remote 5STS tests was 9.1 (2.4) and 9.5 (2.3) seconds, respectively. Remote collection by telehealth was feasible, with only two participants (5.4%) having connectivity issues at the start of the remote assessment, but not interfering with the tests. The remote 5STS test showed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.957), with limits of agreement within acceptable ranges and no significant systematic errors observed. No adverse events were observed within either test environment. Conclusions: Remote 5STS for the assessment of functional lower extremity strength in gastrointestinal cancer patients is feasible, reliable, and safe, and can be used in clinical and research settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10177509 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101775092023-05-13 Feasibility, Reliability, and Safety of Remote Five Times Sit to Stand Test in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer Steffens, Daniel Pocovi, Natasha C. Bartyn, Jenna Delbaere, Kim Hancock, Mark J. Koh, Cherry Denehy, Linda van Schooten, Kimberley S. Solomon, Michael Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: The five times sit to stand (5STS) test is widely used to measure functional lower extremity strength. However, the psychometric properties of the 5STS test when performed remotely is unknown. This study determined the feasibility, reliability, and safety of the remote five times sit to stand test (5STS) in 37 patients scheduled to undergo gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Participants completed the 5STS test both face-to-face and remotely, with the order randomised. The study provides supporting evidence that the remote 5STS test is feasible, reliable, and safe in patients with gastrointestinal cancer and can be used in both clinical and research settings. ABSTRACT: Background: To determine the feasibility, reliability, and safety of the remote five times sit to stand test (5STS) test in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Methods: Consecutive adult patients undergoing surgical treatment for lower gastrointestinal cancer at a major referral hospital in Sydney between July and November 2022 were included. Participants completed the 5STS test both face-to-face and remotely, with the order randomised. Outcomes included measures of feasibility, reliability, and safety. Results: Of fifty-five patients identified, seventeen (30.9%) were not interested, one (1.8%) had no internet coverage, and thirty-seven (67.3%) consented and completed both 5STS tests. The mean (SD) time taken to complete the face-to-face and remote 5STS tests was 9.1 (2.4) and 9.5 (2.3) seconds, respectively. Remote collection by telehealth was feasible, with only two participants (5.4%) having connectivity issues at the start of the remote assessment, but not interfering with the tests. The remote 5STS test showed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.957), with limits of agreement within acceptable ranges and no significant systematic errors observed. No adverse events were observed within either test environment. Conclusions: Remote 5STS for the assessment of functional lower extremity strength in gastrointestinal cancer patients is feasible, reliable, and safe, and can be used in clinical and research settings. MDPI 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10177509/ /pubmed/37173899 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15092434 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Steffens, Daniel Pocovi, Natasha C. Bartyn, Jenna Delbaere, Kim Hancock, Mark J. Koh, Cherry Denehy, Linda van Schooten, Kimberley S. Solomon, Michael Feasibility, Reliability, and Safety of Remote Five Times Sit to Stand Test in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer |
title | Feasibility, Reliability, and Safety of Remote Five Times Sit to Stand Test in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer |
title_full | Feasibility, Reliability, and Safety of Remote Five Times Sit to Stand Test in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer |
title_fullStr | Feasibility, Reliability, and Safety of Remote Five Times Sit to Stand Test in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility, Reliability, and Safety of Remote Five Times Sit to Stand Test in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer |
title_short | Feasibility, Reliability, and Safety of Remote Five Times Sit to Stand Test in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer |
title_sort | feasibility, reliability, and safety of remote five times sit to stand test in patients with gastrointestinal cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10177509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37173899 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15092434 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steffensdaniel feasibilityreliabilityandsafetyofremotefivetimessittostandtestinpatientswithgastrointestinalcancer AT pocovinatashac feasibilityreliabilityandsafetyofremotefivetimessittostandtestinpatientswithgastrointestinalcancer AT bartynjenna feasibilityreliabilityandsafetyofremotefivetimessittostandtestinpatientswithgastrointestinalcancer AT delbaerekim feasibilityreliabilityandsafetyofremotefivetimessittostandtestinpatientswithgastrointestinalcancer AT hancockmarkj feasibilityreliabilityandsafetyofremotefivetimessittostandtestinpatientswithgastrointestinalcancer AT kohcherry feasibilityreliabilityandsafetyofremotefivetimessittostandtestinpatientswithgastrointestinalcancer AT denehylinda feasibilityreliabilityandsafetyofremotefivetimessittostandtestinpatientswithgastrointestinalcancer AT vanschootenkimberleys feasibilityreliabilityandsafetyofremotefivetimessittostandtestinpatientswithgastrointestinalcancer AT solomonmichael feasibilityreliabilityandsafetyofremotefivetimessittostandtestinpatientswithgastrointestinalcancer AT feasibilityreliabilityandsafetyofremotefivetimessittostandtestinpatientswithgastrointestinalcancer |