Cargando…
Mitigation Actions Scenarios Applied to the Dairy Farm Management Systems
The environmental impacts of the dairy industry, particularly global warming, are heavily influenced by milk production. Thus, there is an urgent need for farm-level actions and opportunities for improvement, implying mitigation strategies. The aim of this paper is to investigate five possible mitig...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10178217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37174398 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12091860 |
_version_ | 1785040808749039616 |
---|---|
author | Rencricca, Giulia Froldi, Federico Moschini, Maurizio Trevisan, Marco Lamastra, Lucrezia |
author_facet | Rencricca, Giulia Froldi, Federico Moschini, Maurizio Trevisan, Marco Lamastra, Lucrezia |
author_sort | Rencricca, Giulia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The environmental impacts of the dairy industry, particularly global warming, are heavily influenced by milk production. Thus, there is an urgent need for farm-level actions and opportunities for improvement, implying mitigation strategies. The aim of this paper is to investigate five possible mitigation actions at the dairy farm and which one the farmers were willing to adopt: management and distribution of livestock manure and fertilizers, anaerobic manure treatment, optimization of the herd composition, feed quality, and heat recovery. A life cycle assessment was conducted on 63 farms using the product environmental footprint approach. The latter was divided into four quartiles, from which four representative farms were selected. For each farm, three scenarios have been analyzed considering the reference impact (reference scenario), the application of the mitigation actions (best-case scenario), and what farmers would implement (realistic scenario). Overall, the most effective mitigation actions in the best-case scenario were anaerobic manure treatment and the management and distribution of livestock manure and fertilizers, showing a potential reduction in total environmental impacts of 7–9% and 6–7%, respectively. Farmers’ responses indicated a willingness to implement the latter mitigation strategy better. The optimization of the herd composition, feed quality, and heat recovery reported a range impact reduction between 0.01–5%. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10178217 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101782172023-05-13 Mitigation Actions Scenarios Applied to the Dairy Farm Management Systems Rencricca, Giulia Froldi, Federico Moschini, Maurizio Trevisan, Marco Lamastra, Lucrezia Foods Article The environmental impacts of the dairy industry, particularly global warming, are heavily influenced by milk production. Thus, there is an urgent need for farm-level actions and opportunities for improvement, implying mitigation strategies. The aim of this paper is to investigate five possible mitigation actions at the dairy farm and which one the farmers were willing to adopt: management and distribution of livestock manure and fertilizers, anaerobic manure treatment, optimization of the herd composition, feed quality, and heat recovery. A life cycle assessment was conducted on 63 farms using the product environmental footprint approach. The latter was divided into four quartiles, from which four representative farms were selected. For each farm, three scenarios have been analyzed considering the reference impact (reference scenario), the application of the mitigation actions (best-case scenario), and what farmers would implement (realistic scenario). Overall, the most effective mitigation actions in the best-case scenario were anaerobic manure treatment and the management and distribution of livestock manure and fertilizers, showing a potential reduction in total environmental impacts of 7–9% and 6–7%, respectively. Farmers’ responses indicated a willingness to implement the latter mitigation strategy better. The optimization of the herd composition, feed quality, and heat recovery reported a range impact reduction between 0.01–5%. MDPI 2023-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10178217/ /pubmed/37174398 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12091860 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rencricca, Giulia Froldi, Federico Moschini, Maurizio Trevisan, Marco Lamastra, Lucrezia Mitigation Actions Scenarios Applied to the Dairy Farm Management Systems |
title | Mitigation Actions Scenarios Applied to the Dairy Farm Management Systems |
title_full | Mitigation Actions Scenarios Applied to the Dairy Farm Management Systems |
title_fullStr | Mitigation Actions Scenarios Applied to the Dairy Farm Management Systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Mitigation Actions Scenarios Applied to the Dairy Farm Management Systems |
title_short | Mitigation Actions Scenarios Applied to the Dairy Farm Management Systems |
title_sort | mitigation actions scenarios applied to the dairy farm management systems |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10178217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37174398 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12091860 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rencriccagiulia mitigationactionsscenariosappliedtothedairyfarmmanagementsystems AT froldifederico mitigationactionsscenariosappliedtothedairyfarmmanagementsystems AT moschinimaurizio mitigationactionsscenariosappliedtothedairyfarmmanagementsystems AT trevisanmarco mitigationactionsscenariosappliedtothedairyfarmmanagementsystems AT lamastralucrezia mitigationactionsscenariosappliedtothedairyfarmmanagementsystems |