Cargando…

Mitigation Actions Scenarios Applied to the Dairy Farm Management Systems

The environmental impacts of the dairy industry, particularly global warming, are heavily influenced by milk production. Thus, there is an urgent need for farm-level actions and opportunities for improvement, implying mitigation strategies. The aim of this paper is to investigate five possible mitig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rencricca, Giulia, Froldi, Federico, Moschini, Maurizio, Trevisan, Marco, Lamastra, Lucrezia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10178217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37174398
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12091860
_version_ 1785040808749039616
author Rencricca, Giulia
Froldi, Federico
Moschini, Maurizio
Trevisan, Marco
Lamastra, Lucrezia
author_facet Rencricca, Giulia
Froldi, Federico
Moschini, Maurizio
Trevisan, Marco
Lamastra, Lucrezia
author_sort Rencricca, Giulia
collection PubMed
description The environmental impacts of the dairy industry, particularly global warming, are heavily influenced by milk production. Thus, there is an urgent need for farm-level actions and opportunities for improvement, implying mitigation strategies. The aim of this paper is to investigate five possible mitigation actions at the dairy farm and which one the farmers were willing to adopt: management and distribution of livestock manure and fertilizers, anaerobic manure treatment, optimization of the herd composition, feed quality, and heat recovery. A life cycle assessment was conducted on 63 farms using the product environmental footprint approach. The latter was divided into four quartiles, from which four representative farms were selected. For each farm, three scenarios have been analyzed considering the reference impact (reference scenario), the application of the mitigation actions (best-case scenario), and what farmers would implement (realistic scenario). Overall, the most effective mitigation actions in the best-case scenario were anaerobic manure treatment and the management and distribution of livestock manure and fertilizers, showing a potential reduction in total environmental impacts of 7–9% and 6–7%, respectively. Farmers’ responses indicated a willingness to implement the latter mitigation strategy better. The optimization of the herd composition, feed quality, and heat recovery reported a range impact reduction between 0.01–5%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10178217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101782172023-05-13 Mitigation Actions Scenarios Applied to the Dairy Farm Management Systems Rencricca, Giulia Froldi, Federico Moschini, Maurizio Trevisan, Marco Lamastra, Lucrezia Foods Article The environmental impacts of the dairy industry, particularly global warming, are heavily influenced by milk production. Thus, there is an urgent need for farm-level actions and opportunities for improvement, implying mitigation strategies. The aim of this paper is to investigate five possible mitigation actions at the dairy farm and which one the farmers were willing to adopt: management and distribution of livestock manure and fertilizers, anaerobic manure treatment, optimization of the herd composition, feed quality, and heat recovery. A life cycle assessment was conducted on 63 farms using the product environmental footprint approach. The latter was divided into four quartiles, from which four representative farms were selected. For each farm, three scenarios have been analyzed considering the reference impact (reference scenario), the application of the mitigation actions (best-case scenario), and what farmers would implement (realistic scenario). Overall, the most effective mitigation actions in the best-case scenario were anaerobic manure treatment and the management and distribution of livestock manure and fertilizers, showing a potential reduction in total environmental impacts of 7–9% and 6–7%, respectively. Farmers’ responses indicated a willingness to implement the latter mitigation strategy better. The optimization of the herd composition, feed quality, and heat recovery reported a range impact reduction between 0.01–5%. MDPI 2023-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10178217/ /pubmed/37174398 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12091860 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rencricca, Giulia
Froldi, Federico
Moschini, Maurizio
Trevisan, Marco
Lamastra, Lucrezia
Mitigation Actions Scenarios Applied to the Dairy Farm Management Systems
title Mitigation Actions Scenarios Applied to the Dairy Farm Management Systems
title_full Mitigation Actions Scenarios Applied to the Dairy Farm Management Systems
title_fullStr Mitigation Actions Scenarios Applied to the Dairy Farm Management Systems
title_full_unstemmed Mitigation Actions Scenarios Applied to the Dairy Farm Management Systems
title_short Mitigation Actions Scenarios Applied to the Dairy Farm Management Systems
title_sort mitigation actions scenarios applied to the dairy farm management systems
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10178217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37174398
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12091860
work_keys_str_mv AT rencriccagiulia mitigationactionsscenariosappliedtothedairyfarmmanagementsystems
AT froldifederico mitigationactionsscenariosappliedtothedairyfarmmanagementsystems
AT moschinimaurizio mitigationactionsscenariosappliedtothedairyfarmmanagementsystems
AT trevisanmarco mitigationactionsscenariosappliedtothedairyfarmmanagementsystems
AT lamastralucrezia mitigationactionsscenariosappliedtothedairyfarmmanagementsystems