Cargando…
Salmonella Biofilm Formation under Fluidic Shear Stress on Different Surface Materials
This study characterized biofilm formation of various Salmonella strains on common processing plant surface materials (stainless steel, concrete, rubber, polyethylene) under static and fluidic shear stress conditions. Surface-coupons were immersed in well-plates containing 1 mL of Salmonella (6 log...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10178852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37174455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12091918 |
_version_ | 1785040957688774656 |
---|---|
author | Thames, Hudson T. Pokhrel, Diksha Willis, Emma Rivers, Orion Dinh, Thu T. N. Zhang, Li Schilling, Mark W. Ramachandran, Reshma White, Shecoya Sukumaran, Anuraj T. |
author_facet | Thames, Hudson T. Pokhrel, Diksha Willis, Emma Rivers, Orion Dinh, Thu T. N. Zhang, Li Schilling, Mark W. Ramachandran, Reshma White, Shecoya Sukumaran, Anuraj T. |
author_sort | Thames, Hudson T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study characterized biofilm formation of various Salmonella strains on common processing plant surface materials (stainless steel, concrete, rubber, polyethylene) under static and fluidic shear stress conditions. Surface-coupons were immersed in well-plates containing 1 mL of Salmonella (6 log CFU/mL) and incubated aerobically for 48 h at 37 °C in static or shear stress conditions. Biofilm density was determined using crystal violet assay, and biofilm cells were enumerated by plating on tryptic soy agar plates. Biofilms were visualized using scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed by SAS 9.4 at a significance level of 0.05. A surface–incubation condition interaction was observed for biofilm density (p < 0.001). On stainless steel, the OD(600) was higher under shear stress than static incubation; whereas, on polyethylene, the OD(600) was higher under static condition. Enumeration revealed surface–incubation condition (p = 0.024) and surface–strain (p < 0.001) interactions. Among all surface–incubation condition combinations, the biofilm cells were highest on polyethylene under fluidic shear stress (6.4 log/coupon; p < 0.001). Biofilms of S. Kentucky on polyethylene had the highest number of cells (7.80 log/coupon) compared to all other strain–surface combinations (p < 0.001). Electron microscopy revealed morphological and extracellular matrix differences between surfaces. Results indicate that Salmonella biofilm formation is influenced by serotype, surface, and fluidic shear stress. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10178852 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101788522023-05-13 Salmonella Biofilm Formation under Fluidic Shear Stress on Different Surface Materials Thames, Hudson T. Pokhrel, Diksha Willis, Emma Rivers, Orion Dinh, Thu T. N. Zhang, Li Schilling, Mark W. Ramachandran, Reshma White, Shecoya Sukumaran, Anuraj T. Foods Article This study characterized biofilm formation of various Salmonella strains on common processing plant surface materials (stainless steel, concrete, rubber, polyethylene) under static and fluidic shear stress conditions. Surface-coupons were immersed in well-plates containing 1 mL of Salmonella (6 log CFU/mL) and incubated aerobically for 48 h at 37 °C in static or shear stress conditions. Biofilm density was determined using crystal violet assay, and biofilm cells were enumerated by plating on tryptic soy agar plates. Biofilms were visualized using scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed by SAS 9.4 at a significance level of 0.05. A surface–incubation condition interaction was observed for biofilm density (p < 0.001). On stainless steel, the OD(600) was higher under shear stress than static incubation; whereas, on polyethylene, the OD(600) was higher under static condition. Enumeration revealed surface–incubation condition (p = 0.024) and surface–strain (p < 0.001) interactions. Among all surface–incubation condition combinations, the biofilm cells were highest on polyethylene under fluidic shear stress (6.4 log/coupon; p < 0.001). Biofilms of S. Kentucky on polyethylene had the highest number of cells (7.80 log/coupon) compared to all other strain–surface combinations (p < 0.001). Electron microscopy revealed morphological and extracellular matrix differences between surfaces. Results indicate that Salmonella biofilm formation is influenced by serotype, surface, and fluidic shear stress. MDPI 2023-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10178852/ /pubmed/37174455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12091918 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Thames, Hudson T. Pokhrel, Diksha Willis, Emma Rivers, Orion Dinh, Thu T. N. Zhang, Li Schilling, Mark W. Ramachandran, Reshma White, Shecoya Sukumaran, Anuraj T. Salmonella Biofilm Formation under Fluidic Shear Stress on Different Surface Materials |
title | Salmonella Biofilm Formation under Fluidic Shear Stress on Different Surface Materials |
title_full | Salmonella Biofilm Formation under Fluidic Shear Stress on Different Surface Materials |
title_fullStr | Salmonella Biofilm Formation under Fluidic Shear Stress on Different Surface Materials |
title_full_unstemmed | Salmonella Biofilm Formation under Fluidic Shear Stress on Different Surface Materials |
title_short | Salmonella Biofilm Formation under Fluidic Shear Stress on Different Surface Materials |
title_sort | salmonella biofilm formation under fluidic shear stress on different surface materials |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10178852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37174455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12091918 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thameshudsont salmonellabiofilmformationunderfluidicshearstressondifferentsurfacematerials AT pokhreldiksha salmonellabiofilmformationunderfluidicshearstressondifferentsurfacematerials AT willisemma salmonellabiofilmformationunderfluidicshearstressondifferentsurfacematerials AT riversorion salmonellabiofilmformationunderfluidicshearstressondifferentsurfacematerials AT dinhthutn salmonellabiofilmformationunderfluidicshearstressondifferentsurfacematerials AT zhangli salmonellabiofilmformationunderfluidicshearstressondifferentsurfacematerials AT schillingmarkw salmonellabiofilmformationunderfluidicshearstressondifferentsurfacematerials AT ramachandranreshma salmonellabiofilmformationunderfluidicshearstressondifferentsurfacematerials AT whiteshecoya salmonellabiofilmformationunderfluidicshearstressondifferentsurfacematerials AT sukumarananurajt salmonellabiofilmformationunderfluidicshearstressondifferentsurfacematerials |