Cargando…

Salmonella Biofilm Formation under Fluidic Shear Stress on Different Surface Materials

This study characterized biofilm formation of various Salmonella strains on common processing plant surface materials (stainless steel, concrete, rubber, polyethylene) under static and fluidic shear stress conditions. Surface-coupons were immersed in well-plates containing 1 mL of Salmonella (6 log...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thames, Hudson T., Pokhrel, Diksha, Willis, Emma, Rivers, Orion, Dinh, Thu T. N., Zhang, Li, Schilling, Mark W., Ramachandran, Reshma, White, Shecoya, Sukumaran, Anuraj T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10178852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37174455
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12091918
_version_ 1785040957688774656
author Thames, Hudson T.
Pokhrel, Diksha
Willis, Emma
Rivers, Orion
Dinh, Thu T. N.
Zhang, Li
Schilling, Mark W.
Ramachandran, Reshma
White, Shecoya
Sukumaran, Anuraj T.
author_facet Thames, Hudson T.
Pokhrel, Diksha
Willis, Emma
Rivers, Orion
Dinh, Thu T. N.
Zhang, Li
Schilling, Mark W.
Ramachandran, Reshma
White, Shecoya
Sukumaran, Anuraj T.
author_sort Thames, Hudson T.
collection PubMed
description This study characterized biofilm formation of various Salmonella strains on common processing plant surface materials (stainless steel, concrete, rubber, polyethylene) under static and fluidic shear stress conditions. Surface-coupons were immersed in well-plates containing 1 mL of Salmonella (6 log CFU/mL) and incubated aerobically for 48 h at 37 °C in static or shear stress conditions. Biofilm density was determined using crystal violet assay, and biofilm cells were enumerated by plating on tryptic soy agar plates. Biofilms were visualized using scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed by SAS 9.4 at a significance level of 0.05. A surface–incubation condition interaction was observed for biofilm density (p < 0.001). On stainless steel, the OD(600) was higher under shear stress than static incubation; whereas, on polyethylene, the OD(600) was higher under static condition. Enumeration revealed surface–incubation condition (p = 0.024) and surface–strain (p < 0.001) interactions. Among all surface–incubation condition combinations, the biofilm cells were highest on polyethylene under fluidic shear stress (6.4 log/coupon; p < 0.001). Biofilms of S. Kentucky on polyethylene had the highest number of cells (7.80 log/coupon) compared to all other strain–surface combinations (p < 0.001). Electron microscopy revealed morphological and extracellular matrix differences between surfaces. Results indicate that Salmonella biofilm formation is influenced by serotype, surface, and fluidic shear stress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10178852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101788522023-05-13 Salmonella Biofilm Formation under Fluidic Shear Stress on Different Surface Materials Thames, Hudson T. Pokhrel, Diksha Willis, Emma Rivers, Orion Dinh, Thu T. N. Zhang, Li Schilling, Mark W. Ramachandran, Reshma White, Shecoya Sukumaran, Anuraj T. Foods Article This study characterized biofilm formation of various Salmonella strains on common processing plant surface materials (stainless steel, concrete, rubber, polyethylene) under static and fluidic shear stress conditions. Surface-coupons were immersed in well-plates containing 1 mL of Salmonella (6 log CFU/mL) and incubated aerobically for 48 h at 37 °C in static or shear stress conditions. Biofilm density was determined using crystal violet assay, and biofilm cells were enumerated by plating on tryptic soy agar plates. Biofilms were visualized using scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed by SAS 9.4 at a significance level of 0.05. A surface–incubation condition interaction was observed for biofilm density (p < 0.001). On stainless steel, the OD(600) was higher under shear stress than static incubation; whereas, on polyethylene, the OD(600) was higher under static condition. Enumeration revealed surface–incubation condition (p = 0.024) and surface–strain (p < 0.001) interactions. Among all surface–incubation condition combinations, the biofilm cells were highest on polyethylene under fluidic shear stress (6.4 log/coupon; p < 0.001). Biofilms of S. Kentucky on polyethylene had the highest number of cells (7.80 log/coupon) compared to all other strain–surface combinations (p < 0.001). Electron microscopy revealed morphological and extracellular matrix differences between surfaces. Results indicate that Salmonella biofilm formation is influenced by serotype, surface, and fluidic shear stress. MDPI 2023-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10178852/ /pubmed/37174455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12091918 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Thames, Hudson T.
Pokhrel, Diksha
Willis, Emma
Rivers, Orion
Dinh, Thu T. N.
Zhang, Li
Schilling, Mark W.
Ramachandran, Reshma
White, Shecoya
Sukumaran, Anuraj T.
Salmonella Biofilm Formation under Fluidic Shear Stress on Different Surface Materials
title Salmonella Biofilm Formation under Fluidic Shear Stress on Different Surface Materials
title_full Salmonella Biofilm Formation under Fluidic Shear Stress on Different Surface Materials
title_fullStr Salmonella Biofilm Formation under Fluidic Shear Stress on Different Surface Materials
title_full_unstemmed Salmonella Biofilm Formation under Fluidic Shear Stress on Different Surface Materials
title_short Salmonella Biofilm Formation under Fluidic Shear Stress on Different Surface Materials
title_sort salmonella biofilm formation under fluidic shear stress on different surface materials
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10178852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37174455
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12091918
work_keys_str_mv AT thameshudsont salmonellabiofilmformationunderfluidicshearstressondifferentsurfacematerials
AT pokhreldiksha salmonellabiofilmformationunderfluidicshearstressondifferentsurfacematerials
AT willisemma salmonellabiofilmformationunderfluidicshearstressondifferentsurfacematerials
AT riversorion salmonellabiofilmformationunderfluidicshearstressondifferentsurfacematerials
AT dinhthutn salmonellabiofilmformationunderfluidicshearstressondifferentsurfacematerials
AT zhangli salmonellabiofilmformationunderfluidicshearstressondifferentsurfacematerials
AT schillingmarkw salmonellabiofilmformationunderfluidicshearstressondifferentsurfacematerials
AT ramachandranreshma salmonellabiofilmformationunderfluidicshearstressondifferentsurfacematerials
AT whiteshecoya salmonellabiofilmformationunderfluidicshearstressondifferentsurfacematerials
AT sukumarananurajt salmonellabiofilmformationunderfluidicshearstressondifferentsurfacematerials