Cargando…

Effect of Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy on the Postoperative Course for Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Objectives: Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) preceding robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) may be beneficial in high-risk cases to facilitate surgical resection. Yet, its improvement in local tumor control is not obvious. Its benefit regarding overall cancer survival is also not evident, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farzat, Mahmoud, Weib, Peter, Sukhanov, Iurii, Rosenbauer, Josef, Tanislav, Christian, Wagenlehner, Florian M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10179004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37176494
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093053
_version_ 1785040995369353216
author Farzat, Mahmoud
Weib, Peter
Sukhanov, Iurii
Rosenbauer, Josef
Tanislav, Christian
Wagenlehner, Florian M.
author_facet Farzat, Mahmoud
Weib, Peter
Sukhanov, Iurii
Rosenbauer, Josef
Tanislav, Christian
Wagenlehner, Florian M.
author_sort Farzat, Mahmoud
collection PubMed
description Objectives: Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) preceding robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) may be beneficial in high-risk cases to facilitate surgical resection. Yet, its improvement in local tumor control is not obvious. Its benefit regarding overall cancer survival is also not evident, and it may worsen sexual and hormonal functions. This study explores the effect of NHT on the perioperative course after RARP. Methods: In this study, 500 patients from a tertiary referral center who underwent RARP by a specialized surgeon were retrospectively included. Patients were divided into two groups: the NHT (n = 55, 11%) group, which included patients who received NHT (median: 1 month prior to RARP), and the standard non-NHT (NNHT) group (n = 445, 89%). Demographic and perioperative data were analyzed. Postoperative results, complications, and readmission rates were compared between the groups. Results: NHT patients were heterogeneous from the rest regarding cancer parameters such as PSA (25 vs. 7.8 ng/mL) and tumor risk stratification, and they were more comorbid (p = 0.006 for the ASA score). They also received fewer nerve-sparing procedures (14.5% vs. 80.4%), while the operation time was similar. Positive surgical margins (PSM) (21.8% vs. 5.4%) and positive lymph nodes (PLN) (56.4% vs. 12.7%) were significantly higher in the NHT group compared to the non-NHT (NNHT) group. Hospital stay was equal, whereas catheter days were 3 days longer in the NHT group. NHT patients also suffered more minor vesicourethral-anastomosis-related complications. Major complications (p = 0.825) and readmissions (p = 0.070) did not differ between groups. Conclusion: Patients receiving NHT before RARP did not experience more major complications or readmissions within 90 days after surgery. Patients with unfavorable, high-risk tumors may benefit from NHT since it facilitates surgical resection. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to measure the advantages and disadvantages of NHT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10179004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101790042023-05-13 Effect of Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy on the Postoperative Course for Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Farzat, Mahmoud Weib, Peter Sukhanov, Iurii Rosenbauer, Josef Tanislav, Christian Wagenlehner, Florian M. J Clin Med Article Objectives: Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) preceding robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) may be beneficial in high-risk cases to facilitate surgical resection. Yet, its improvement in local tumor control is not obvious. Its benefit regarding overall cancer survival is also not evident, and it may worsen sexual and hormonal functions. This study explores the effect of NHT on the perioperative course after RARP. Methods: In this study, 500 patients from a tertiary referral center who underwent RARP by a specialized surgeon were retrospectively included. Patients were divided into two groups: the NHT (n = 55, 11%) group, which included patients who received NHT (median: 1 month prior to RARP), and the standard non-NHT (NNHT) group (n = 445, 89%). Demographic and perioperative data were analyzed. Postoperative results, complications, and readmission rates were compared between the groups. Results: NHT patients were heterogeneous from the rest regarding cancer parameters such as PSA (25 vs. 7.8 ng/mL) and tumor risk stratification, and they were more comorbid (p = 0.006 for the ASA score). They also received fewer nerve-sparing procedures (14.5% vs. 80.4%), while the operation time was similar. Positive surgical margins (PSM) (21.8% vs. 5.4%) and positive lymph nodes (PLN) (56.4% vs. 12.7%) were significantly higher in the NHT group compared to the non-NHT (NNHT) group. Hospital stay was equal, whereas catheter days were 3 days longer in the NHT group. NHT patients also suffered more minor vesicourethral-anastomosis-related complications. Major complications (p = 0.825) and readmissions (p = 0.070) did not differ between groups. Conclusion: Patients receiving NHT before RARP did not experience more major complications or readmissions within 90 days after surgery. Patients with unfavorable, high-risk tumors may benefit from NHT since it facilitates surgical resection. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to measure the advantages and disadvantages of NHT. MDPI 2023-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10179004/ /pubmed/37176494 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093053 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Farzat, Mahmoud
Weib, Peter
Sukhanov, Iurii
Rosenbauer, Josef
Tanislav, Christian
Wagenlehner, Florian M.
Effect of Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy on the Postoperative Course for Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
title Effect of Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy on the Postoperative Course for Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
title_full Effect of Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy on the Postoperative Course for Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
title_fullStr Effect of Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy on the Postoperative Course for Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy on the Postoperative Course for Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
title_short Effect of Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy on the Postoperative Course for Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
title_sort effect of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on the postoperative course for patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10179004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37176494
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093053
work_keys_str_mv AT farzatmahmoud effectofneoadjuvanthormonaltherapyonthepostoperativecourseforpatientsundergoingrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT weibpeter effectofneoadjuvanthormonaltherapyonthepostoperativecourseforpatientsundergoingrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT sukhanoviurii effectofneoadjuvanthormonaltherapyonthepostoperativecourseforpatientsundergoingrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT rosenbauerjosef effectofneoadjuvanthormonaltherapyonthepostoperativecourseforpatientsundergoingrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT tanislavchristian effectofneoadjuvanthormonaltherapyonthepostoperativecourseforpatientsundergoingrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT wagenlehnerflorianm effectofneoadjuvanthormonaltherapyonthepostoperativecourseforpatientsundergoingrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy