Cargando…

The Accuracy of Sonographically Estimated Fetal Weight and Prediction of Small for Gestational Age in Twin Pregnancy—Comparison of the First and Second Twins

Accurate sonographic estimation of fetal weight is essential for every pregnancy, especially in twin gestation. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the sonographically estimated fetal weight (sEFW) of all twin gestations performed within 14 days of delivery in a single center that aimed to eval...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gawie-Rotman, Moran, Menashe, Shoval, Haggiag, Noa, Shrim, Alon, Hallak, Mordechai, Gabbay-Benziv, Rinat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10179063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37176747
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093307
_version_ 1785041009549246464
author Gawie-Rotman, Moran
Menashe, Shoval
Haggiag, Noa
Shrim, Alon
Hallak, Mordechai
Gabbay-Benziv, Rinat
author_facet Gawie-Rotman, Moran
Menashe, Shoval
Haggiag, Noa
Shrim, Alon
Hallak, Mordechai
Gabbay-Benziv, Rinat
author_sort Gawie-Rotman, Moran
collection PubMed
description Accurate sonographic estimation of fetal weight is essential for every pregnancy, especially in twin gestation. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the sonographically estimated fetal weight (sEFW) of all twin gestations performed within 14 days of delivery in a single center that aimed to evaluate the accuracy of sEFW in predicting neonatal weight and small for gestational age (SGA) by comparing the first fetus to the second. A total of 190 twin gestations were evaluated for the study. There was no statistically significant difference in the sEFW between the first and the second twins, but the second twin had a statistically significant lower birth weight (2434 vs. 2351 g, p = 0.028). No difference was found in median absolute systematic error (p = 0.450), random error, or sEFW evaluations that were within 10% of the birth weight between the fetuses (65.3% vs. 67.9%, p = 0.587). Reliability analysis demonstrated an excellent correlation between the sEFW and the birth weight for both twins; however, the Euclidean distance was slightly higher for the first twin (12.21%). For SGA prediction, overall, there was a low sensitivity and a high specificity for all fetuses, with almost no difference between the first and second twins. We found that sEFW overestimated the birth weight for the second twin, with almost no other difference in accuracy measures or SGA prediction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10179063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101790632023-05-13 The Accuracy of Sonographically Estimated Fetal Weight and Prediction of Small for Gestational Age in Twin Pregnancy—Comparison of the First and Second Twins Gawie-Rotman, Moran Menashe, Shoval Haggiag, Noa Shrim, Alon Hallak, Mordechai Gabbay-Benziv, Rinat J Clin Med Article Accurate sonographic estimation of fetal weight is essential for every pregnancy, especially in twin gestation. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the sonographically estimated fetal weight (sEFW) of all twin gestations performed within 14 days of delivery in a single center that aimed to evaluate the accuracy of sEFW in predicting neonatal weight and small for gestational age (SGA) by comparing the first fetus to the second. A total of 190 twin gestations were evaluated for the study. There was no statistically significant difference in the sEFW between the first and the second twins, but the second twin had a statistically significant lower birth weight (2434 vs. 2351 g, p = 0.028). No difference was found in median absolute systematic error (p = 0.450), random error, or sEFW evaluations that were within 10% of the birth weight between the fetuses (65.3% vs. 67.9%, p = 0.587). Reliability analysis demonstrated an excellent correlation between the sEFW and the birth weight for both twins; however, the Euclidean distance was slightly higher for the first twin (12.21%). For SGA prediction, overall, there was a low sensitivity and a high specificity for all fetuses, with almost no difference between the first and second twins. We found that sEFW overestimated the birth weight for the second twin, with almost no other difference in accuracy measures or SGA prediction. MDPI 2023-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10179063/ /pubmed/37176747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093307 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gawie-Rotman, Moran
Menashe, Shoval
Haggiag, Noa
Shrim, Alon
Hallak, Mordechai
Gabbay-Benziv, Rinat
The Accuracy of Sonographically Estimated Fetal Weight and Prediction of Small for Gestational Age in Twin Pregnancy—Comparison of the First and Second Twins
title The Accuracy of Sonographically Estimated Fetal Weight and Prediction of Small for Gestational Age in Twin Pregnancy—Comparison of the First and Second Twins
title_full The Accuracy of Sonographically Estimated Fetal Weight and Prediction of Small for Gestational Age in Twin Pregnancy—Comparison of the First and Second Twins
title_fullStr The Accuracy of Sonographically Estimated Fetal Weight and Prediction of Small for Gestational Age in Twin Pregnancy—Comparison of the First and Second Twins
title_full_unstemmed The Accuracy of Sonographically Estimated Fetal Weight and Prediction of Small for Gestational Age in Twin Pregnancy—Comparison of the First and Second Twins
title_short The Accuracy of Sonographically Estimated Fetal Weight and Prediction of Small for Gestational Age in Twin Pregnancy—Comparison of the First and Second Twins
title_sort accuracy of sonographically estimated fetal weight and prediction of small for gestational age in twin pregnancy—comparison of the first and second twins
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10179063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37176747
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093307
work_keys_str_mv AT gawierotmanmoran theaccuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins
AT menasheshoval theaccuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins
AT haggiagnoa theaccuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins
AT shrimalon theaccuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins
AT hallakmordechai theaccuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins
AT gabbaybenzivrinat theaccuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins
AT gawierotmanmoran accuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins
AT menasheshoval accuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins
AT haggiagnoa accuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins
AT shrimalon accuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins
AT hallakmordechai accuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins
AT gabbaybenzivrinat accuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins