Cargando…
The Accuracy of Sonographically Estimated Fetal Weight and Prediction of Small for Gestational Age in Twin Pregnancy—Comparison of the First and Second Twins
Accurate sonographic estimation of fetal weight is essential for every pregnancy, especially in twin gestation. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the sonographically estimated fetal weight (sEFW) of all twin gestations performed within 14 days of delivery in a single center that aimed to eval...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10179063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37176747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093307 |
_version_ | 1785041009549246464 |
---|---|
author | Gawie-Rotman, Moran Menashe, Shoval Haggiag, Noa Shrim, Alon Hallak, Mordechai Gabbay-Benziv, Rinat |
author_facet | Gawie-Rotman, Moran Menashe, Shoval Haggiag, Noa Shrim, Alon Hallak, Mordechai Gabbay-Benziv, Rinat |
author_sort | Gawie-Rotman, Moran |
collection | PubMed |
description | Accurate sonographic estimation of fetal weight is essential for every pregnancy, especially in twin gestation. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the sonographically estimated fetal weight (sEFW) of all twin gestations performed within 14 days of delivery in a single center that aimed to evaluate the accuracy of sEFW in predicting neonatal weight and small for gestational age (SGA) by comparing the first fetus to the second. A total of 190 twin gestations were evaluated for the study. There was no statistically significant difference in the sEFW between the first and the second twins, but the second twin had a statistically significant lower birth weight (2434 vs. 2351 g, p = 0.028). No difference was found in median absolute systematic error (p = 0.450), random error, or sEFW evaluations that were within 10% of the birth weight between the fetuses (65.3% vs. 67.9%, p = 0.587). Reliability analysis demonstrated an excellent correlation between the sEFW and the birth weight for both twins; however, the Euclidean distance was slightly higher for the first twin (12.21%). For SGA prediction, overall, there was a low sensitivity and a high specificity for all fetuses, with almost no difference between the first and second twins. We found that sEFW overestimated the birth weight for the second twin, with almost no other difference in accuracy measures or SGA prediction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10179063 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101790632023-05-13 The Accuracy of Sonographically Estimated Fetal Weight and Prediction of Small for Gestational Age in Twin Pregnancy—Comparison of the First and Second Twins Gawie-Rotman, Moran Menashe, Shoval Haggiag, Noa Shrim, Alon Hallak, Mordechai Gabbay-Benziv, Rinat J Clin Med Article Accurate sonographic estimation of fetal weight is essential for every pregnancy, especially in twin gestation. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the sonographically estimated fetal weight (sEFW) of all twin gestations performed within 14 days of delivery in a single center that aimed to evaluate the accuracy of sEFW in predicting neonatal weight and small for gestational age (SGA) by comparing the first fetus to the second. A total of 190 twin gestations were evaluated for the study. There was no statistically significant difference in the sEFW between the first and the second twins, but the second twin had a statistically significant lower birth weight (2434 vs. 2351 g, p = 0.028). No difference was found in median absolute systematic error (p = 0.450), random error, or sEFW evaluations that were within 10% of the birth weight between the fetuses (65.3% vs. 67.9%, p = 0.587). Reliability analysis demonstrated an excellent correlation between the sEFW and the birth weight for both twins; however, the Euclidean distance was slightly higher for the first twin (12.21%). For SGA prediction, overall, there was a low sensitivity and a high specificity for all fetuses, with almost no difference between the first and second twins. We found that sEFW overestimated the birth weight for the second twin, with almost no other difference in accuracy measures or SGA prediction. MDPI 2023-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10179063/ /pubmed/37176747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093307 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Gawie-Rotman, Moran Menashe, Shoval Haggiag, Noa Shrim, Alon Hallak, Mordechai Gabbay-Benziv, Rinat The Accuracy of Sonographically Estimated Fetal Weight and Prediction of Small for Gestational Age in Twin Pregnancy—Comparison of the First and Second Twins |
title | The Accuracy of Sonographically Estimated Fetal Weight and Prediction of Small for Gestational Age in Twin Pregnancy—Comparison of the First and Second Twins |
title_full | The Accuracy of Sonographically Estimated Fetal Weight and Prediction of Small for Gestational Age in Twin Pregnancy—Comparison of the First and Second Twins |
title_fullStr | The Accuracy of Sonographically Estimated Fetal Weight and Prediction of Small for Gestational Age in Twin Pregnancy—Comparison of the First and Second Twins |
title_full_unstemmed | The Accuracy of Sonographically Estimated Fetal Weight and Prediction of Small for Gestational Age in Twin Pregnancy—Comparison of the First and Second Twins |
title_short | The Accuracy of Sonographically Estimated Fetal Weight and Prediction of Small for Gestational Age in Twin Pregnancy—Comparison of the First and Second Twins |
title_sort | accuracy of sonographically estimated fetal weight and prediction of small for gestational age in twin pregnancy—comparison of the first and second twins |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10179063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37176747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093307 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gawierotmanmoran theaccuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins AT menasheshoval theaccuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins AT haggiagnoa theaccuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins AT shrimalon theaccuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins AT hallakmordechai theaccuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins AT gabbaybenzivrinat theaccuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins AT gawierotmanmoran accuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins AT menasheshoval accuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins AT haggiagnoa accuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins AT shrimalon accuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins AT hallakmordechai accuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins AT gabbaybenzivrinat accuracyofsonographicallyestimatedfetalweightandpredictionofsmallforgestationalageintwinpregnancycomparisonofthefirstandsecondtwins |