Cargando…

2023 Update on Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adult Patients: Management in the Emergency Department

Background: Sepsis/septic shock is a life-threatening and time-dependent condition that requires timely management to reduce mortality. This review aims to update physicians with regard to the main pillars of treatment for this insidious condition. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE were searched f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guarino, Matteo, Perna, Benedetta, Cesaro, Alice Eleonora, Maritati, Martina, Spampinato, Michele Domenico, Contini, Carlo, De Giorgio, Roberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10179263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37176628
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093188
_version_ 1785041056660717568
author Guarino, Matteo
Perna, Benedetta
Cesaro, Alice Eleonora
Maritati, Martina
Spampinato, Michele Domenico
Contini, Carlo
De Giorgio, Roberto
author_facet Guarino, Matteo
Perna, Benedetta
Cesaro, Alice Eleonora
Maritati, Martina
Spampinato, Michele Domenico
Contini, Carlo
De Giorgio, Roberto
author_sort Guarino, Matteo
collection PubMed
description Background: Sepsis/septic shock is a life-threatening and time-dependent condition that requires timely management to reduce mortality. This review aims to update physicians with regard to the main pillars of treatment for this insidious condition. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE were searched from inception with special attention paid to November 2021–January 2023. Results: The management of sepsis/septic shock is challenging and involves different pathophysiological aspects, encompassing empirical antimicrobial treatment (which is promptly administered after microbial tests), fluid (crystalloids) replacement (to be established according to fluid tolerance and fluid responsiveness), and vasoactive agents (e.g., norepinephrine (NE)), which are employed to maintain mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg and reduce the risk of fluid overload. In cases of refractory shock, vasopressin (rather than epinephrine) should be combined with NE to reach an acceptable level of pressure control. If mechanical ventilation is indicated, the tidal volume should be reduced from 10 to 6 mL/kg. Heparin is administered to prevent venous thromboembolism, and glycemic control is recommended. The efficacy of other treatments (e.g., proton-pump inhibitors, sodium bicarbonate, etc.) is largely debated, and such treatments might be used on a case-to-case basis. Conclusions: The management of sepsis/septic shock has significantly progressed in the last few years. Improving knowledge of the main therapeutic cornerstones of this challenging condition is crucial to achieve better patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10179263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101792632023-05-13 2023 Update on Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adult Patients: Management in the Emergency Department Guarino, Matteo Perna, Benedetta Cesaro, Alice Eleonora Maritati, Martina Spampinato, Michele Domenico Contini, Carlo De Giorgio, Roberto J Clin Med Review Background: Sepsis/septic shock is a life-threatening and time-dependent condition that requires timely management to reduce mortality. This review aims to update physicians with regard to the main pillars of treatment for this insidious condition. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE were searched from inception with special attention paid to November 2021–January 2023. Results: The management of sepsis/septic shock is challenging and involves different pathophysiological aspects, encompassing empirical antimicrobial treatment (which is promptly administered after microbial tests), fluid (crystalloids) replacement (to be established according to fluid tolerance and fluid responsiveness), and vasoactive agents (e.g., norepinephrine (NE)), which are employed to maintain mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg and reduce the risk of fluid overload. In cases of refractory shock, vasopressin (rather than epinephrine) should be combined with NE to reach an acceptable level of pressure control. If mechanical ventilation is indicated, the tidal volume should be reduced from 10 to 6 mL/kg. Heparin is administered to prevent venous thromboembolism, and glycemic control is recommended. The efficacy of other treatments (e.g., proton-pump inhibitors, sodium bicarbonate, etc.) is largely debated, and such treatments might be used on a case-to-case basis. Conclusions: The management of sepsis/septic shock has significantly progressed in the last few years. Improving knowledge of the main therapeutic cornerstones of this challenging condition is crucial to achieve better patient outcomes. MDPI 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10179263/ /pubmed/37176628 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093188 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Guarino, Matteo
Perna, Benedetta
Cesaro, Alice Eleonora
Maritati, Martina
Spampinato, Michele Domenico
Contini, Carlo
De Giorgio, Roberto
2023 Update on Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adult Patients: Management in the Emergency Department
title 2023 Update on Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adult Patients: Management in the Emergency Department
title_full 2023 Update on Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adult Patients: Management in the Emergency Department
title_fullStr 2023 Update on Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adult Patients: Management in the Emergency Department
title_full_unstemmed 2023 Update on Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adult Patients: Management in the Emergency Department
title_short 2023 Update on Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adult Patients: Management in the Emergency Department
title_sort 2023 update on sepsis and septic shock in adult patients: management in the emergency department
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10179263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37176628
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093188
work_keys_str_mv AT guarinomatteo 2023updateonsepsisandsepticshockinadultpatientsmanagementintheemergencydepartment
AT pernabenedetta 2023updateonsepsisandsepticshockinadultpatientsmanagementintheemergencydepartment
AT cesaroaliceeleonora 2023updateonsepsisandsepticshockinadultpatientsmanagementintheemergencydepartment
AT maritatimartina 2023updateonsepsisandsepticshockinadultpatientsmanagementintheemergencydepartment
AT spampinatomicheledomenico 2023updateonsepsisandsepticshockinadultpatientsmanagementintheemergencydepartment
AT continicarlo 2023updateonsepsisandsepticshockinadultpatientsmanagementintheemergencydepartment
AT degiorgioroberto 2023updateonsepsisandsepticshockinadultpatientsmanagementintheemergencydepartment