Cargando…

Pelvic Floor Muscle Training versus Functional Magnetic Stimulation for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: There is strong evidence that specific pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) reduces stress urinary incontinence (SUI), but the application of functional magnetic stimulation (FMS) is still under discussion. Objective: To evaluate and compare the effects of FMS and PFMT on pelvic floor mus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dudonienė, Vilma, Kirklytė, Indrė, Žlibinaitė, Laura, Jerez-Roig, Javier, Rutkauskaitė, Renata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10179444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37176598
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093157
_version_ 1785041099247583232
author Dudonienė, Vilma
Kirklytė, Indrė
Žlibinaitė, Laura
Jerez-Roig, Javier
Rutkauskaitė, Renata
author_facet Dudonienė, Vilma
Kirklytė, Indrė
Žlibinaitė, Laura
Jerez-Roig, Javier
Rutkauskaitė, Renata
author_sort Dudonienė, Vilma
collection PubMed
description Background: There is strong evidence that specific pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) reduces stress urinary incontinence (SUI), but the application of functional magnetic stimulation (FMS) is still under discussion. Objective: To evaluate and compare the effects of FMS and PFMT on pelvic floor muscle function, urinary incontinence symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in women with SUI. Methods: A randomized controlled, parallel-group trial was executed in an outpatient physical medicine and rehabilitation centre. The study included 68 women and was fully completed by 48 women (n = 24 in each group) aged 29–49 years, with SUI, who were randomly assigned to PFMT and FMS groups. The symptoms of urinary incontinence and their impact on quality of life were assessed with two questionnaires: the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Short Form (ICIQ-SF) and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire–Short Form (IIQ-7). Perineometer (Pelvexiser) was used to measure the resting vaginal pressure, pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength and endurance. All outcome measures were taken at baseline and after 6 weeks of interventions. Cohen’s effect size (d) was calculated. Results: A significant improvement (p < 0.05) of ICIQ-SF and IIQ-7 was observed in both groups with a high effect size in the PFMT group (d = 1.56 and d = 1.17, respectively) and the FMS group (d = 1.33 and d = 1.45, respectively). ICIQ-SF and IIQ-7 scores did not differ significantly between groups after the 6-week treatment period. Resting vaginal pressure, PFM strength and endurance increased (p < 0.05) in both groups with a medium (d = 0.52) to large (d = 1.56) effect size. Conclusion: No significant difference between groups was found in any measurement of perineometry. PFMT and FMS significantly improved SUI symptoms and the quality of life of the study participants. None of the applied interventions was superior to the other in the short-term effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10179444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101794442023-05-13 Pelvic Floor Muscle Training versus Functional Magnetic Stimulation for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial Dudonienė, Vilma Kirklytė, Indrė Žlibinaitė, Laura Jerez-Roig, Javier Rutkauskaitė, Renata J Clin Med Article Background: There is strong evidence that specific pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) reduces stress urinary incontinence (SUI), but the application of functional magnetic stimulation (FMS) is still under discussion. Objective: To evaluate and compare the effects of FMS and PFMT on pelvic floor muscle function, urinary incontinence symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in women with SUI. Methods: A randomized controlled, parallel-group trial was executed in an outpatient physical medicine and rehabilitation centre. The study included 68 women and was fully completed by 48 women (n = 24 in each group) aged 29–49 years, with SUI, who were randomly assigned to PFMT and FMS groups. The symptoms of urinary incontinence and their impact on quality of life were assessed with two questionnaires: the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Short Form (ICIQ-SF) and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire–Short Form (IIQ-7). Perineometer (Pelvexiser) was used to measure the resting vaginal pressure, pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength and endurance. All outcome measures were taken at baseline and after 6 weeks of interventions. Cohen’s effect size (d) was calculated. Results: A significant improvement (p < 0.05) of ICIQ-SF and IIQ-7 was observed in both groups with a high effect size in the PFMT group (d = 1.56 and d = 1.17, respectively) and the FMS group (d = 1.33 and d = 1.45, respectively). ICIQ-SF and IIQ-7 scores did not differ significantly between groups after the 6-week treatment period. Resting vaginal pressure, PFM strength and endurance increased (p < 0.05) in both groups with a medium (d = 0.52) to large (d = 1.56) effect size. Conclusion: No significant difference between groups was found in any measurement of perineometry. PFMT and FMS significantly improved SUI symptoms and the quality of life of the study participants. None of the applied interventions was superior to the other in the short-term effect. MDPI 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10179444/ /pubmed/37176598 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093157 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dudonienė, Vilma
Kirklytė, Indrė
Žlibinaitė, Laura
Jerez-Roig, Javier
Rutkauskaitė, Renata
Pelvic Floor Muscle Training versus Functional Magnetic Stimulation for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Pelvic Floor Muscle Training versus Functional Magnetic Stimulation for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Pelvic Floor Muscle Training versus Functional Magnetic Stimulation for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Pelvic Floor Muscle Training versus Functional Magnetic Stimulation for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Pelvic Floor Muscle Training versus Functional Magnetic Stimulation for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Pelvic Floor Muscle Training versus Functional Magnetic Stimulation for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort pelvic floor muscle training versus functional magnetic stimulation for stress urinary incontinence in women: a randomized controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10179444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37176598
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093157
work_keys_str_mv AT dudonienevilma pelvicfloormuscletrainingversusfunctionalmagneticstimulationforstressurinaryincontinenceinwomenarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kirklyteindre pelvicfloormuscletrainingversusfunctionalmagneticstimulationforstressurinaryincontinenceinwomenarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zlibinaitelaura pelvicfloormuscletrainingversusfunctionalmagneticstimulationforstressurinaryincontinenceinwomenarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jerezroigjavier pelvicfloormuscletrainingversusfunctionalmagneticstimulationforstressurinaryincontinenceinwomenarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rutkauskaiterenata pelvicfloormuscletrainingversusfunctionalmagneticstimulationforstressurinaryincontinenceinwomenarandomizedcontrolledtrial