Cargando…
Who and how, DNA sensors in NETs-driven inflammation
During infections, neutrophil extracellular traps act like a meshwork of molecules that captures microbes. In contrast, during sterile inflammation the presence of NETs is usually associated with tissue damage and uncontrolled inflammation. In this context, DNA acts both as activator of NETs formati...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10179500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37187738 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1190177 |
_version_ | 1785041112737513472 |
---|---|
author | Aubé, Félix-Antoine Bidias, Amel Pépin, Geneviève |
author_facet | Aubé, Félix-Antoine Bidias, Amel Pépin, Geneviève |
author_sort | Aubé, Félix-Antoine |
collection | PubMed |
description | During infections, neutrophil extracellular traps act like a meshwork of molecules that captures microbes. In contrast, during sterile inflammation the presence of NETs is usually associated with tissue damage and uncontrolled inflammation. In this context, DNA acts both as activator of NETs formation and immunogenic molecule fueling inflammation within the injured tissue microenvironment. Pattern recognition receptors that specifically bind to and get activated by DNA such as Toll-like receptor-9 (TLR9), cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS), Nod-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) and Absence in Melanoma-2 (AIM2) have been reported to play a role in NETs formation and detection. However, how these DNA sensors contribute to NETs-driven inflammation is not well understood. Whether these DNA sensors have unique roles or on the contrary they are mostly redundant is still elusive. In this review, we summarize the known contribution of the above DNA sensors to the formation and detection of NETs in the context of sterile inflammation. We also highlight scientific gaps needed to be addressed and propose future direction for therapeutic targets. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10179500 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101795002023-05-13 Who and how, DNA sensors in NETs-driven inflammation Aubé, Félix-Antoine Bidias, Amel Pépin, Geneviève Front Immunol Immunology During infections, neutrophil extracellular traps act like a meshwork of molecules that captures microbes. In contrast, during sterile inflammation the presence of NETs is usually associated with tissue damage and uncontrolled inflammation. In this context, DNA acts both as activator of NETs formation and immunogenic molecule fueling inflammation within the injured tissue microenvironment. Pattern recognition receptors that specifically bind to and get activated by DNA such as Toll-like receptor-9 (TLR9), cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS), Nod-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) and Absence in Melanoma-2 (AIM2) have been reported to play a role in NETs formation and detection. However, how these DNA sensors contribute to NETs-driven inflammation is not well understood. Whether these DNA sensors have unique roles or on the contrary they are mostly redundant is still elusive. In this review, we summarize the known contribution of the above DNA sensors to the formation and detection of NETs in the context of sterile inflammation. We also highlight scientific gaps needed to be addressed and propose future direction for therapeutic targets. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10179500/ /pubmed/37187738 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1190177 Text en Copyright © 2023 Aubé, Bidias and Pépin https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology Aubé, Félix-Antoine Bidias, Amel Pépin, Geneviève Who and how, DNA sensors in NETs-driven inflammation |
title | Who and how, DNA sensors in NETs-driven inflammation |
title_full | Who and how, DNA sensors in NETs-driven inflammation |
title_fullStr | Who and how, DNA sensors in NETs-driven inflammation |
title_full_unstemmed | Who and how, DNA sensors in NETs-driven inflammation |
title_short | Who and how, DNA sensors in NETs-driven inflammation |
title_sort | who and how, dna sensors in nets-driven inflammation |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10179500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37187738 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1190177 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aubefelixantoine whoandhowdnasensorsinnetsdriveninflammation AT bidiasamel whoandhowdnasensorsinnetsdriveninflammation AT pepingenevieve whoandhowdnasensorsinnetsdriveninflammation |