Cargando…
Comparison of Continuous and Pulsating Water Jet during Piercing of Ductile Material
More efficient ways to process materials are constantly being sought, even in the case of continuous water flow technology, which acts on materials mainly by stagnant pressure. An alternative method is an ultrasound-stimulated pulsating water jet, the basis of which is the repeated use of impact pre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10179743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37176440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16093558 |
_version_ | 1785041170158583808 |
---|---|
author | Nag, Akash Srivastava, Madhulika Petrů, Jana Váňová, Petra Srivastava, Ashish Kumar Hloch, Sergej |
author_facet | Nag, Akash Srivastava, Madhulika Petrů, Jana Váňová, Petra Srivastava, Ashish Kumar Hloch, Sergej |
author_sort | Nag, Akash |
collection | PubMed |
description | More efficient ways to process materials are constantly being sought, even in the case of continuous water flow technology, which acts on materials mainly by stagnant pressure. An alternative method is an ultrasound-stimulated pulsating water jet, the basis of which is the repeated use of impact pressure, which reduces the time interval for mechanical relaxation. This article focuses on a comparative study from the point of view of water mass flow rate on material penetration and its integrity. Relatively low pressures (p = 20, 30, and 40 MPa) with varying nozzle diameters (d = 0.4 and 0.6 mm) were used to identify the effectiveness of the pulsating water jet. The time exposure of the jet at a fixed place was varied from t = 0.5 to 5 s for each experimental condition. The results showed that with an increase in the pressure and diameter values, the disintegration depth increased. In addition, the surface topography and morphology images showed signs of ductile erosion in the form of erosion pits, upheaved surfaces, and crater formation. The microhardness study showed an increase of 10% subsurface microhardness after the action of the pulsating water jet as compared to the original material. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10179743 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101797432023-05-13 Comparison of Continuous and Pulsating Water Jet during Piercing of Ductile Material Nag, Akash Srivastava, Madhulika Petrů, Jana Váňová, Petra Srivastava, Ashish Kumar Hloch, Sergej Materials (Basel) Article More efficient ways to process materials are constantly being sought, even in the case of continuous water flow technology, which acts on materials mainly by stagnant pressure. An alternative method is an ultrasound-stimulated pulsating water jet, the basis of which is the repeated use of impact pressure, which reduces the time interval for mechanical relaxation. This article focuses on a comparative study from the point of view of water mass flow rate on material penetration and its integrity. Relatively low pressures (p = 20, 30, and 40 MPa) with varying nozzle diameters (d = 0.4 and 0.6 mm) were used to identify the effectiveness of the pulsating water jet. The time exposure of the jet at a fixed place was varied from t = 0.5 to 5 s for each experimental condition. The results showed that with an increase in the pressure and diameter values, the disintegration depth increased. In addition, the surface topography and morphology images showed signs of ductile erosion in the form of erosion pits, upheaved surfaces, and crater formation. The microhardness study showed an increase of 10% subsurface microhardness after the action of the pulsating water jet as compared to the original material. MDPI 2023-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10179743/ /pubmed/37176440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16093558 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Nag, Akash Srivastava, Madhulika Petrů, Jana Váňová, Petra Srivastava, Ashish Kumar Hloch, Sergej Comparison of Continuous and Pulsating Water Jet during Piercing of Ductile Material |
title | Comparison of Continuous and Pulsating Water Jet during Piercing of Ductile Material |
title_full | Comparison of Continuous and Pulsating Water Jet during Piercing of Ductile Material |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Continuous and Pulsating Water Jet during Piercing of Ductile Material |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Continuous and Pulsating Water Jet during Piercing of Ductile Material |
title_short | Comparison of Continuous and Pulsating Water Jet during Piercing of Ductile Material |
title_sort | comparison of continuous and pulsating water jet during piercing of ductile material |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10179743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37176440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16093558 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nagakash comparisonofcontinuousandpulsatingwaterjetduringpiercingofductilematerial AT srivastavamadhulika comparisonofcontinuousandpulsatingwaterjetduringpiercingofductilematerial AT petrujana comparisonofcontinuousandpulsatingwaterjetduringpiercingofductilematerial AT vanovapetra comparisonofcontinuousandpulsatingwaterjetduringpiercingofductilematerial AT srivastavaashishkumar comparisonofcontinuousandpulsatingwaterjetduringpiercingofductilematerial AT hlochsergej comparisonofcontinuousandpulsatingwaterjetduringpiercingofductilematerial |