Cargando…

Comparison of Continuous and Pulsating Water Jet during Piercing of Ductile Material

More efficient ways to process materials are constantly being sought, even in the case of continuous water flow technology, which acts on materials mainly by stagnant pressure. An alternative method is an ultrasound-stimulated pulsating water jet, the basis of which is the repeated use of impact pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nag, Akash, Srivastava, Madhulika, Petrů, Jana, Váňová, Petra, Srivastava, Ashish Kumar, Hloch, Sergej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10179743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37176440
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16093558
_version_ 1785041170158583808
author Nag, Akash
Srivastava, Madhulika
Petrů, Jana
Váňová, Petra
Srivastava, Ashish Kumar
Hloch, Sergej
author_facet Nag, Akash
Srivastava, Madhulika
Petrů, Jana
Váňová, Petra
Srivastava, Ashish Kumar
Hloch, Sergej
author_sort Nag, Akash
collection PubMed
description More efficient ways to process materials are constantly being sought, even in the case of continuous water flow technology, which acts on materials mainly by stagnant pressure. An alternative method is an ultrasound-stimulated pulsating water jet, the basis of which is the repeated use of impact pressure, which reduces the time interval for mechanical relaxation. This article focuses on a comparative study from the point of view of water mass flow rate on material penetration and its integrity. Relatively low pressures (p = 20, 30, and 40 MPa) with varying nozzle diameters (d = 0.4 and 0.6 mm) were used to identify the effectiveness of the pulsating water jet. The time exposure of the jet at a fixed place was varied from t = 0.5 to 5 s for each experimental condition. The results showed that with an increase in the pressure and diameter values, the disintegration depth increased. In addition, the surface topography and morphology images showed signs of ductile erosion in the form of erosion pits, upheaved surfaces, and crater formation. The microhardness study showed an increase of 10% subsurface microhardness after the action of the pulsating water jet as compared to the original material.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10179743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101797432023-05-13 Comparison of Continuous and Pulsating Water Jet during Piercing of Ductile Material Nag, Akash Srivastava, Madhulika Petrů, Jana Váňová, Petra Srivastava, Ashish Kumar Hloch, Sergej Materials (Basel) Article More efficient ways to process materials are constantly being sought, even in the case of continuous water flow technology, which acts on materials mainly by stagnant pressure. An alternative method is an ultrasound-stimulated pulsating water jet, the basis of which is the repeated use of impact pressure, which reduces the time interval for mechanical relaxation. This article focuses on a comparative study from the point of view of water mass flow rate on material penetration and its integrity. Relatively low pressures (p = 20, 30, and 40 MPa) with varying nozzle diameters (d = 0.4 and 0.6 mm) were used to identify the effectiveness of the pulsating water jet. The time exposure of the jet at a fixed place was varied from t = 0.5 to 5 s for each experimental condition. The results showed that with an increase in the pressure and diameter values, the disintegration depth increased. In addition, the surface topography and morphology images showed signs of ductile erosion in the form of erosion pits, upheaved surfaces, and crater formation. The microhardness study showed an increase of 10% subsurface microhardness after the action of the pulsating water jet as compared to the original material. MDPI 2023-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10179743/ /pubmed/37176440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16093558 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nag, Akash
Srivastava, Madhulika
Petrů, Jana
Váňová, Petra
Srivastava, Ashish Kumar
Hloch, Sergej
Comparison of Continuous and Pulsating Water Jet during Piercing of Ductile Material
title Comparison of Continuous and Pulsating Water Jet during Piercing of Ductile Material
title_full Comparison of Continuous and Pulsating Water Jet during Piercing of Ductile Material
title_fullStr Comparison of Continuous and Pulsating Water Jet during Piercing of Ductile Material
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Continuous and Pulsating Water Jet during Piercing of Ductile Material
title_short Comparison of Continuous and Pulsating Water Jet during Piercing of Ductile Material
title_sort comparison of continuous and pulsating water jet during piercing of ductile material
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10179743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37176440
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16093558
work_keys_str_mv AT nagakash comparisonofcontinuousandpulsatingwaterjetduringpiercingofductilematerial
AT srivastavamadhulika comparisonofcontinuousandpulsatingwaterjetduringpiercingofductilematerial
AT petrujana comparisonofcontinuousandpulsatingwaterjetduringpiercingofductilematerial
AT vanovapetra comparisonofcontinuousandpulsatingwaterjetduringpiercingofductilematerial
AT srivastavaashishkumar comparisonofcontinuousandpulsatingwaterjetduringpiercingofductilematerial
AT hlochsergej comparisonofcontinuousandpulsatingwaterjetduringpiercingofductilematerial