Cargando…
Discussion on Static Resistance of Granite under Penetration
A total of 9 tests were carried out with 30 mm and 78 mm caliber scaled projectiles penetrating into granite targets. The penetration depth, crater diameter, and mass loss rate were examined and discussed. The results indicate that the dimensionless penetration depth of large-caliber projectiles is...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10179759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37176236 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16093353 |
_version_ | 1785041173893611520 |
---|---|
author | Nie, Xiaodong Wu, Xiangyun Yi, Zhi Long, Zhilin Zhou, Hui Ji, Nan |
author_facet | Nie, Xiaodong Wu, Xiangyun Yi, Zhi Long, Zhilin Zhou, Hui Ji, Nan |
author_sort | Nie, Xiaodong |
collection | PubMed |
description | A total of 9 tests were carried out with 30 mm and 78 mm caliber scaled projectiles penetrating into granite targets. The penetration depth, crater diameter, and mass loss rate were examined and discussed. The results indicate that the dimensionless penetration depth of large-caliber projectiles is 20% greater than small-caliber projectiles. Based on the description of static resistance R(a) in the Forrestal semi-empirical formula, the size effect of dimensionless penetration depth can be attributed to the size effect of static resistance R(a), and it can be seen that the penetration static resistance of projectile A is 40% higher than that of projectile B. Numerical simulations of projectile penetration into granite targets were conducted using the finite element program ANSYS/LS-DYNA. In terms of penetration depth and crater damage, the numerical simulation results agree well with the test data. This suggests that the selection of parameters was reasonable. The influence of compressive strength, projectile striking velocity, mass, diameter, and caliber–radius–head (CRH) ratio on the static resistance R(a) were studied by RHT model parameterization. Based on the numerical results from the parametric study, an empirical formula was derived to predict the static resistance R(a). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10179759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101797592023-05-13 Discussion on Static Resistance of Granite under Penetration Nie, Xiaodong Wu, Xiangyun Yi, Zhi Long, Zhilin Zhou, Hui Ji, Nan Materials (Basel) Article A total of 9 tests were carried out with 30 mm and 78 mm caliber scaled projectiles penetrating into granite targets. The penetration depth, crater diameter, and mass loss rate were examined and discussed. The results indicate that the dimensionless penetration depth of large-caliber projectiles is 20% greater than small-caliber projectiles. Based on the description of static resistance R(a) in the Forrestal semi-empirical formula, the size effect of dimensionless penetration depth can be attributed to the size effect of static resistance R(a), and it can be seen that the penetration static resistance of projectile A is 40% higher than that of projectile B. Numerical simulations of projectile penetration into granite targets were conducted using the finite element program ANSYS/LS-DYNA. In terms of penetration depth and crater damage, the numerical simulation results agree well with the test data. This suggests that the selection of parameters was reasonable. The influence of compressive strength, projectile striking velocity, mass, diameter, and caliber–radius–head (CRH) ratio on the static resistance R(a) were studied by RHT model parameterization. Based on the numerical results from the parametric study, an empirical formula was derived to predict the static resistance R(a). MDPI 2023-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10179759/ /pubmed/37176236 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16093353 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Nie, Xiaodong Wu, Xiangyun Yi, Zhi Long, Zhilin Zhou, Hui Ji, Nan Discussion on Static Resistance of Granite under Penetration |
title | Discussion on Static Resistance of Granite under Penetration |
title_full | Discussion on Static Resistance of Granite under Penetration |
title_fullStr | Discussion on Static Resistance of Granite under Penetration |
title_full_unstemmed | Discussion on Static Resistance of Granite under Penetration |
title_short | Discussion on Static Resistance of Granite under Penetration |
title_sort | discussion on static resistance of granite under penetration |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10179759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37176236 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16093353 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT niexiaodong discussiononstaticresistanceofgraniteunderpenetration AT wuxiangyun discussiononstaticresistanceofgraniteunderpenetration AT yizhi discussiononstaticresistanceofgraniteunderpenetration AT longzhilin discussiononstaticresistanceofgraniteunderpenetration AT zhouhui discussiononstaticresistanceofgraniteunderpenetration AT jinan discussiononstaticresistanceofgraniteunderpenetration |