Cargando…

Genomic inbreeding coefficients using imputed genotypes: assessing differences among SNP panels in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of imputation of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) on the estimation of genomic inbreeding coefficients. Imputed genotypes of 68,127 Italian Holstein dairy cows were analyzed. Cows were initially genotyped with two high density (HD) SNP pane...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dadousis, Christos, Ablondi, Michela, Cipolat-Gotet, Claudio, van Kaam, Jan-Thijs, Finocchiaro, Raffaella, Marusi, Maurizio, Cassandro, Martino, Sabbioni, Alberto, Summer, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10180025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37187928
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1142476
_version_ 1785041237078704128
author Dadousis, Christos
Ablondi, Michela
Cipolat-Gotet, Claudio
van Kaam, Jan-Thijs
Finocchiaro, Raffaella
Marusi, Maurizio
Cassandro, Martino
Sabbioni, Alberto
Summer, Andrea
author_facet Dadousis, Christos
Ablondi, Michela
Cipolat-Gotet, Claudio
van Kaam, Jan-Thijs
Finocchiaro, Raffaella
Marusi, Maurizio
Cassandro, Martino
Sabbioni, Alberto
Summer, Andrea
author_sort Dadousis, Christos
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of imputation of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) on the estimation of genomic inbreeding coefficients. Imputed genotypes of 68,127 Italian Holstein dairy cows were analyzed. Cows were initially genotyped with two high density (HD) SNP panels, namely the Illumina Infinium BovineHD BeadChip (678 cows; 777,962 SNP) and the Genomic Profiler HD-150K (641 cows; 139,914 SNP), and four medium density (MD): GeneSeek Genomic Profiler 3 (10,679 cows; 26,151 SNP), GeneSeek Genomic Profiler 4 (33,394 cows; 30,113 SNP), GeneSeek MD (12,030 cows; 47,850 SNP) and the Labogena MD (10,705 cows; 41,911 SNP). After imputation, all cows had genomic information on 84,445 SNP. Seven genomic inbreeding estimators were tested: (i) four PLINK v1.9 estimators (F, F(hat1,2,3)), (ii) two genomic relationship matrix (grm) estimators [VanRaden's 1(st) method, but with observed allele frequencies (F(grm)) and VanRaden's 3(rd) method that is allelic free and pedigree dependent (F(grm2))], and (iii) a runs of homozygosity (roh) – based estimator (F(roh)). Genomic inbreeding coefficients of each SNP panel were compared with genomic inbreeding coefficients derived from the 84,445 imputation SNP. Coefficients of the HD SNP panels were consistent between genotyped-imputed SNP (Pearson correlations ~99%), while variability across SNP panels and estimators was observed in the MD SNP panels, with Labogena MD providing, on average, more consistent estimates. The robustness of Labogena MD, can be partly explained by the fact that 97.85% of the SNP of this panel is included in the 84,445 SNP selected by ANAFIBJ for routine genomic imputations, while this percentage for the other MD SNP panels varied between 55 and 60%. Runs of homozygosity was the most robust estimator. Genomic inbreeding estimates using imputation SNP are influenced by the SNP number of the SNP panel that are included in the imputed SNP, and performance of genomic inbreeding estimators depends on the imputation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10180025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101800252023-05-13 Genomic inbreeding coefficients using imputed genotypes: assessing differences among SNP panels in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows Dadousis, Christos Ablondi, Michela Cipolat-Gotet, Claudio van Kaam, Jan-Thijs Finocchiaro, Raffaella Marusi, Maurizio Cassandro, Martino Sabbioni, Alberto Summer, Andrea Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of imputation of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) on the estimation of genomic inbreeding coefficients. Imputed genotypes of 68,127 Italian Holstein dairy cows were analyzed. Cows were initially genotyped with two high density (HD) SNP panels, namely the Illumina Infinium BovineHD BeadChip (678 cows; 777,962 SNP) and the Genomic Profiler HD-150K (641 cows; 139,914 SNP), and four medium density (MD): GeneSeek Genomic Profiler 3 (10,679 cows; 26,151 SNP), GeneSeek Genomic Profiler 4 (33,394 cows; 30,113 SNP), GeneSeek MD (12,030 cows; 47,850 SNP) and the Labogena MD (10,705 cows; 41,911 SNP). After imputation, all cows had genomic information on 84,445 SNP. Seven genomic inbreeding estimators were tested: (i) four PLINK v1.9 estimators (F, F(hat1,2,3)), (ii) two genomic relationship matrix (grm) estimators [VanRaden's 1(st) method, but with observed allele frequencies (F(grm)) and VanRaden's 3(rd) method that is allelic free and pedigree dependent (F(grm2))], and (iii) a runs of homozygosity (roh) – based estimator (F(roh)). Genomic inbreeding coefficients of each SNP panel were compared with genomic inbreeding coefficients derived from the 84,445 imputation SNP. Coefficients of the HD SNP panels were consistent between genotyped-imputed SNP (Pearson correlations ~99%), while variability across SNP panels and estimators was observed in the MD SNP panels, with Labogena MD providing, on average, more consistent estimates. The robustness of Labogena MD, can be partly explained by the fact that 97.85% of the SNP of this panel is included in the 84,445 SNP selected by ANAFIBJ for routine genomic imputations, while this percentage for the other MD SNP panels varied between 55 and 60%. Runs of homozygosity was the most robust estimator. Genomic inbreeding estimates using imputation SNP are influenced by the SNP number of the SNP panel that are included in the imputed SNP, and performance of genomic inbreeding estimators depends on the imputation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10180025/ /pubmed/37187928 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1142476 Text en Copyright © 2023 Dadousis, Ablondi, Cipolat-Gotet, van Kaam, Finocchiaro, Marusi, Cassandro, Sabbioni and Summer. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Dadousis, Christos
Ablondi, Michela
Cipolat-Gotet, Claudio
van Kaam, Jan-Thijs
Finocchiaro, Raffaella
Marusi, Maurizio
Cassandro, Martino
Sabbioni, Alberto
Summer, Andrea
Genomic inbreeding coefficients using imputed genotypes: assessing differences among SNP panels in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows
title Genomic inbreeding coefficients using imputed genotypes: assessing differences among SNP panels in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows
title_full Genomic inbreeding coefficients using imputed genotypes: assessing differences among SNP panels in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows
title_fullStr Genomic inbreeding coefficients using imputed genotypes: assessing differences among SNP panels in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows
title_full_unstemmed Genomic inbreeding coefficients using imputed genotypes: assessing differences among SNP panels in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows
title_short Genomic inbreeding coefficients using imputed genotypes: assessing differences among SNP panels in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows
title_sort genomic inbreeding coefficients using imputed genotypes: assessing differences among snp panels in holstein-friesian dairy cows
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10180025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37187928
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1142476
work_keys_str_mv AT dadousischristos genomicinbreedingcoefficientsusingimputedgenotypesassessingdifferencesamongsnppanelsinholsteinfriesiandairycows
AT ablondimichela genomicinbreedingcoefficientsusingimputedgenotypesassessingdifferencesamongsnppanelsinholsteinfriesiandairycows
AT cipolatgotetclaudio genomicinbreedingcoefficientsusingimputedgenotypesassessingdifferencesamongsnppanelsinholsteinfriesiandairycows
AT vankaamjanthijs genomicinbreedingcoefficientsusingimputedgenotypesassessingdifferencesamongsnppanelsinholsteinfriesiandairycows
AT finocchiaroraffaella genomicinbreedingcoefficientsusingimputedgenotypesassessingdifferencesamongsnppanelsinholsteinfriesiandairycows
AT marusimaurizio genomicinbreedingcoefficientsusingimputedgenotypesassessingdifferencesamongsnppanelsinholsteinfriesiandairycows
AT cassandromartino genomicinbreedingcoefficientsusingimputedgenotypesassessingdifferencesamongsnppanelsinholsteinfriesiandairycows
AT sabbionialberto genomicinbreedingcoefficientsusingimputedgenotypesassessingdifferencesamongsnppanelsinholsteinfriesiandairycows
AT summerandrea genomicinbreedingcoefficientsusingimputedgenotypesassessingdifferencesamongsnppanelsinholsteinfriesiandairycows