Cargando…

Dynamic Fracture and Crack Arrest Toughness Evaluation of High-Performance Steel Used in Highway Bridges

Impact energy tests are an efficient method of verifying adequate toughness of steel prior to it being put into service. Based on a multitude of historical correlations between impact energy and fracture toughness, minimum impact energy requirements that correspond to desired levels of fracture toug...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Collins, William N., Yount, Tristan D., Sherman, Ryan J., Leon, Roberto T., Connor, Robert J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10180142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37176282
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16093402
_version_ 1785041265610457088
author Collins, William N.
Yount, Tristan D.
Sherman, Ryan J.
Leon, Roberto T.
Connor, Robert J.
author_facet Collins, William N.
Yount, Tristan D.
Sherman, Ryan J.
Leon, Roberto T.
Connor, Robert J.
author_sort Collins, William N.
collection PubMed
description Impact energy tests are an efficient method of verifying adequate toughness of steel prior to it being put into service. Based on a multitude of historical correlations between impact energy and fracture toughness, minimum impact energy requirements that correspond to desired levels of fracture toughness are prescribed by steel bridge design specifications. Research characterizing the fracture behavior of grade 485 and 690 (70 and 100) high-performance steel utilized impact, fracture toughness, and crack arrest testing to verify adequate performance for bridge applications. Fracture toughness results from both quasi-static and dynamic stress intensity rate tests were analyzed using the most recently adopted master curve methodology. Both impact and fracture toughness tests indicated performance significantly greater than the minimum required by material specifications. Even at the AASHTO Zone III service temperature, which is significantly colder than prescribed test temperatures, minimum average impact energy requirements were greatly exceeded. All master curve reference temperatures, both for quasi-static and dynamic loading rates, were found to be colder than the Zone III minimum service temperature. Three correlations between impact energy and fracture toughness were evaluated and found to estimate reference temperatures that are conservative by 12 to 50 °C (22 to 90 °F) on average for the grades and specimen types tested. The evaluation of two reference temperature shifts intended to account for the loading rate was also performed and the results are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10180142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101801422023-05-13 Dynamic Fracture and Crack Arrest Toughness Evaluation of High-Performance Steel Used in Highway Bridges Collins, William N. Yount, Tristan D. Sherman, Ryan J. Leon, Roberto T. Connor, Robert J. Materials (Basel) Article Impact energy tests are an efficient method of verifying adequate toughness of steel prior to it being put into service. Based on a multitude of historical correlations between impact energy and fracture toughness, minimum impact energy requirements that correspond to desired levels of fracture toughness are prescribed by steel bridge design specifications. Research characterizing the fracture behavior of grade 485 and 690 (70 and 100) high-performance steel utilized impact, fracture toughness, and crack arrest testing to verify adequate performance for bridge applications. Fracture toughness results from both quasi-static and dynamic stress intensity rate tests were analyzed using the most recently adopted master curve methodology. Both impact and fracture toughness tests indicated performance significantly greater than the minimum required by material specifications. Even at the AASHTO Zone III service temperature, which is significantly colder than prescribed test temperatures, minimum average impact energy requirements were greatly exceeded. All master curve reference temperatures, both for quasi-static and dynamic loading rates, were found to be colder than the Zone III minimum service temperature. Three correlations between impact energy and fracture toughness were evaluated and found to estimate reference temperatures that are conservative by 12 to 50 °C (22 to 90 °F) on average for the grades and specimen types tested. The evaluation of two reference temperature shifts intended to account for the loading rate was also performed and the results are discussed. MDPI 2023-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10180142/ /pubmed/37176282 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16093402 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Collins, William N.
Yount, Tristan D.
Sherman, Ryan J.
Leon, Roberto T.
Connor, Robert J.
Dynamic Fracture and Crack Arrest Toughness Evaluation of High-Performance Steel Used in Highway Bridges
title Dynamic Fracture and Crack Arrest Toughness Evaluation of High-Performance Steel Used in Highway Bridges
title_full Dynamic Fracture and Crack Arrest Toughness Evaluation of High-Performance Steel Used in Highway Bridges
title_fullStr Dynamic Fracture and Crack Arrest Toughness Evaluation of High-Performance Steel Used in Highway Bridges
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Fracture and Crack Arrest Toughness Evaluation of High-Performance Steel Used in Highway Bridges
title_short Dynamic Fracture and Crack Arrest Toughness Evaluation of High-Performance Steel Used in Highway Bridges
title_sort dynamic fracture and crack arrest toughness evaluation of high-performance steel used in highway bridges
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10180142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37176282
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16093402
work_keys_str_mv AT collinswilliamn dynamicfractureandcrackarresttoughnessevaluationofhighperformancesteelusedinhighwaybridges
AT younttristand dynamicfractureandcrackarresttoughnessevaluationofhighperformancesteelusedinhighwaybridges
AT shermanryanj dynamicfractureandcrackarresttoughnessevaluationofhighperformancesteelusedinhighwaybridges
AT leonrobertot dynamicfractureandcrackarresttoughnessevaluationofhighperformancesteelusedinhighwaybridges
AT connorrobertj dynamicfractureandcrackarresttoughnessevaluationofhighperformancesteelusedinhighwaybridges