Cargando…

Effect of Extruder Type in the Interface of PLA Layers in FDM Printers: Filament Extruder Versus Direct Pellet Extruder

FDM (Fused Deposition Modeling) is one of the most used and industrially applied additive manufacturing processes due to its fast prototyping and manufacturing, simplicity, and low cost of the equipment. However, the mechanical properties of the printed products have a large dependence on orientatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pagés-Llobet, Antoni, Espinach, Francesc X., Julián, Fernando, Oliver-Ortega, Helena, Méndez, José Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10180944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37177167
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15092019
_version_ 1785041455706800128
author Pagés-Llobet, Antoni
Espinach, Francesc X.
Julián, Fernando
Oliver-Ortega, Helena
Méndez, José Alberto
author_facet Pagés-Llobet, Antoni
Espinach, Francesc X.
Julián, Fernando
Oliver-Ortega, Helena
Méndez, José Alberto
author_sort Pagés-Llobet, Antoni
collection PubMed
description FDM (Fused Deposition Modeling) is one of the most used and industrially applied additive manufacturing processes due to its fast prototyping and manufacturing, simplicity, and low cost of the equipment. However, the mechanical properties of the printed products have a large dependence on orientation and interface strength between layers which is mainly related to the thermal union obtained. This thermal union has a large dependence on the melting and cooling down process. Additionally, the materials used must be extruded in a continuous filament before their use, which limits the materials used. However, a pellet extruder could be used directly in the printing equipment, avoiding filament extrusion. In this work, specimens of PLA (Poly(lactic acid)) with different bead orientations have been produced via filament or pellet extrusion to compare the effect of the different melting processes in the manufacturing methodology. Pellet extruded specimens showed higher infill and mechanical properties. These results were related to better adhesion between layers due to the longer melting and cooling process. The result was confirmed using DSC and XRD techniques, where a higher crystallinity was observed. A bicomponent specimen (50% pellet–50% filament) was prepared and tested, showing higher mechanical results than expected, which was, again, due to the better thermal union obtained in the pellet extruder.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10180944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101809442023-05-13 Effect of Extruder Type in the Interface of PLA Layers in FDM Printers: Filament Extruder Versus Direct Pellet Extruder Pagés-Llobet, Antoni Espinach, Francesc X. Julián, Fernando Oliver-Ortega, Helena Méndez, José Alberto Polymers (Basel) Article FDM (Fused Deposition Modeling) is one of the most used and industrially applied additive manufacturing processes due to its fast prototyping and manufacturing, simplicity, and low cost of the equipment. However, the mechanical properties of the printed products have a large dependence on orientation and interface strength between layers which is mainly related to the thermal union obtained. This thermal union has a large dependence on the melting and cooling down process. Additionally, the materials used must be extruded in a continuous filament before their use, which limits the materials used. However, a pellet extruder could be used directly in the printing equipment, avoiding filament extrusion. In this work, specimens of PLA (Poly(lactic acid)) with different bead orientations have been produced via filament or pellet extrusion to compare the effect of the different melting processes in the manufacturing methodology. Pellet extruded specimens showed higher infill and mechanical properties. These results were related to better adhesion between layers due to the longer melting and cooling process. The result was confirmed using DSC and XRD techniques, where a higher crystallinity was observed. A bicomponent specimen (50% pellet–50% filament) was prepared and tested, showing higher mechanical results than expected, which was, again, due to the better thermal union obtained in the pellet extruder. MDPI 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10180944/ /pubmed/37177167 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15092019 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pagés-Llobet, Antoni
Espinach, Francesc X.
Julián, Fernando
Oliver-Ortega, Helena
Méndez, José Alberto
Effect of Extruder Type in the Interface of PLA Layers in FDM Printers: Filament Extruder Versus Direct Pellet Extruder
title Effect of Extruder Type in the Interface of PLA Layers in FDM Printers: Filament Extruder Versus Direct Pellet Extruder
title_full Effect of Extruder Type in the Interface of PLA Layers in FDM Printers: Filament Extruder Versus Direct Pellet Extruder
title_fullStr Effect of Extruder Type in the Interface of PLA Layers in FDM Printers: Filament Extruder Versus Direct Pellet Extruder
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Extruder Type in the Interface of PLA Layers in FDM Printers: Filament Extruder Versus Direct Pellet Extruder
title_short Effect of Extruder Type in the Interface of PLA Layers in FDM Printers: Filament Extruder Versus Direct Pellet Extruder
title_sort effect of extruder type in the interface of pla layers in fdm printers: filament extruder versus direct pellet extruder
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10180944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37177167
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15092019
work_keys_str_mv AT pagesllobetantoni effectofextrudertypeintheinterfaceofplalayersinfdmprintersfilamentextruderversusdirectpelletextruder
AT espinachfrancescx effectofextrudertypeintheinterfaceofplalayersinfdmprintersfilamentextruderversusdirectpelletextruder
AT julianfernando effectofextrudertypeintheinterfaceofplalayersinfdmprintersfilamentextruderversusdirectpelletextruder
AT oliverortegahelena effectofextrudertypeintheinterfaceofplalayersinfdmprintersfilamentextruderversusdirectpelletextruder
AT mendezjosealberto effectofextrudertypeintheinterfaceofplalayersinfdmprintersfilamentextruderversusdirectpelletextruder