Cargando…
Vitamin D Supplementation and Vitamin D Status during Pregnancy and the Risk of Congenital Anomalies—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Maternal dietary factors have been suggested as possible contributing influences for congenital anomalies (CAs). We aimed to assess the association between vitamin D supplementation or vitamin D status (s-25OHD) during pregnancy and CAs in the offspring. A comprehensive literature search was conduct...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10181330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37432271 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15092125 |
_version_ | 1785041548680888320 |
---|---|
author | Walker, Karen Christina Thorsteinsdottir, Fanney Christesen, Henrik Thybo Hjortdal, Vibeke Elisabeth Heitmann, Berit Lilienthal Specht, Ina Olmer Händel, Mina Nicole |
author_facet | Walker, Karen Christina Thorsteinsdottir, Fanney Christesen, Henrik Thybo Hjortdal, Vibeke Elisabeth Heitmann, Berit Lilienthal Specht, Ina Olmer Händel, Mina Nicole |
author_sort | Walker, Karen Christina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Maternal dietary factors have been suggested as possible contributing influences for congenital anomalies (CAs). We aimed to assess the association between vitamin D supplementation or vitamin D status (s-25OHD) during pregnancy and CAs in the offspring. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the three electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Included studies were critically appraised using appropriate tools (risk of bias 2, ROBINS-I). A protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42019127131). A meta-analysis of four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) including 3931 participants showed no effect of vitamin D supplementation on CAs, a relative risk of 0.76 (95% CI 0.45; 1.30), with moderate certainty in the effect estimates by GRADE assessment. Of the nine identified observational studies, six were excluded due to a critical risk of bias in accordance with ROBINS-I. Among the included observational studies, two studies found no association, whereas one case-control study identified an association between s-25OHD < 20 nmol/L and neural tube defects, with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.34 (95% CI: 1.07; 5.07). Interpretation of the results should be cautious given the low prevalence of CAs, RCTs with onset of supplementation after organogenesis, and low-quality observational studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10181330 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101813302023-05-13 Vitamin D Supplementation and Vitamin D Status during Pregnancy and the Risk of Congenital Anomalies—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Walker, Karen Christina Thorsteinsdottir, Fanney Christesen, Henrik Thybo Hjortdal, Vibeke Elisabeth Heitmann, Berit Lilienthal Specht, Ina Olmer Händel, Mina Nicole Nutrients Systematic Review Maternal dietary factors have been suggested as possible contributing influences for congenital anomalies (CAs). We aimed to assess the association between vitamin D supplementation or vitamin D status (s-25OHD) during pregnancy and CAs in the offspring. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the three electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Included studies were critically appraised using appropriate tools (risk of bias 2, ROBINS-I). A protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42019127131). A meta-analysis of four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) including 3931 participants showed no effect of vitamin D supplementation on CAs, a relative risk of 0.76 (95% CI 0.45; 1.30), with moderate certainty in the effect estimates by GRADE assessment. Of the nine identified observational studies, six were excluded due to a critical risk of bias in accordance with ROBINS-I. Among the included observational studies, two studies found no association, whereas one case-control study identified an association between s-25OHD < 20 nmol/L and neural tube defects, with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.34 (95% CI: 1.07; 5.07). Interpretation of the results should be cautious given the low prevalence of CAs, RCTs with onset of supplementation after organogenesis, and low-quality observational studies. MDPI 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10181330/ /pubmed/37432271 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15092125 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Walker, Karen Christina Thorsteinsdottir, Fanney Christesen, Henrik Thybo Hjortdal, Vibeke Elisabeth Heitmann, Berit Lilienthal Specht, Ina Olmer Händel, Mina Nicole Vitamin D Supplementation and Vitamin D Status during Pregnancy and the Risk of Congenital Anomalies—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Vitamin D Supplementation and Vitamin D Status during Pregnancy and the Risk of Congenital Anomalies—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Vitamin D Supplementation and Vitamin D Status during Pregnancy and the Risk of Congenital Anomalies—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Vitamin D Supplementation and Vitamin D Status during Pregnancy and the Risk of Congenital Anomalies—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Vitamin D Supplementation and Vitamin D Status during Pregnancy and the Risk of Congenital Anomalies—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Vitamin D Supplementation and Vitamin D Status during Pregnancy and the Risk of Congenital Anomalies—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | vitamin d supplementation and vitamin d status during pregnancy and the risk of congenital anomalies—a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10181330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37432271 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15092125 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walkerkarenchristina vitamindsupplementationandvitamindstatusduringpregnancyandtheriskofcongenitalanomaliesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT thorsteinsdottirfanney vitamindsupplementationandvitamindstatusduringpregnancyandtheriskofcongenitalanomaliesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT christesenhenrikthybo vitamindsupplementationandvitamindstatusduringpregnancyandtheriskofcongenitalanomaliesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hjortdalvibekeelisabeth vitamindsupplementationandvitamindstatusduringpregnancyandtheriskofcongenitalanomaliesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT heitmannberitlilienthal vitamindsupplementationandvitamindstatusduringpregnancyandtheriskofcongenitalanomaliesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT spechtinaolmer vitamindsupplementationandvitamindstatusduringpregnancyandtheriskofcongenitalanomaliesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT handelminanicole vitamindsupplementationandvitamindstatusduringpregnancyandtheriskofcongenitalanomaliesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |