Cargando…

Improving Gastrointestinal Cancer Care by Enhanced Recovery Protocol Implementation

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) have become the standard of care for patients undergoing elective small bowel surgeries but have not yet been adequately studied in community hospitals. In this study, a multidisciplinary ERP was developed and implemented at a community hospital to incl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frankel, Lexi, Maurente, Diego, Ardeljan, Amalia D., Divesh, Manjani, Rashid, Ali M., Takabe, Kazuaki, Rashid, Omar M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10181426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37188038
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjon1534
_version_ 1785041571711811584
author Frankel, Lexi
Maurente, Diego
Ardeljan, Amalia D.
Divesh, Manjani
Rashid, Ali M.
Takabe, Kazuaki
Rashid, Omar M.
author_facet Frankel, Lexi
Maurente, Diego
Ardeljan, Amalia D.
Divesh, Manjani
Rashid, Ali M.
Takabe, Kazuaki
Rashid, Omar M.
author_sort Frankel, Lexi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) have become the standard of care for patients undergoing elective small bowel surgeries but have not yet been adequately studied in community hospitals. In this study, a multidisciplinary ERP was developed and implemented at a community hospital to include minimal anesthesia, early ambulation and enteral alimentation, and multimodal analgesia. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of the ERP on postoperative length of stay (LOS), readmission (RA) rates following bowel surgery, and postoperative outcomes. METHODS: The study design was a retrospective review of patients undergoing major bowel resection at Holy Cross Hospital (HCH) from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. Patient charts for diagnostic-related group (DRG) 329, 330, and 331 were retrospectively reviewed at HCH in 2017 to compare outcomes in ERP versus non-ERP cases. The Medicare claims database (CMS) was also retrospectively reviewed to compare HCH data to the national average LOS and RA for the same DRG codes. Mean values for LOS and RA were statistically compared to determine significant differences between ERP versus non-ERP patients at HCH and national CMS data versus HCH patients. RESULTS: LOS was analyzed for each DRG at HCH. At HCH, for DRG 329, the mean LOS for non-ERP was 13.0833 days (n = 12) versus 3.375 days (n = 8) (P ≤ 0.001) for ERP. For DRG 330, the mean LOS for non-ERP was 10.861 days (n = 36) versus 4.583 days (n = 24) (P ≤ 0.001) for ERP. For DRG 331, the mean LOS for non-ERP was 7.272 days (n = 11) versus 3.348 days (n = 23) (P = 0.004) for ERP. LOS was also compared to national CMS data. The LOS at HCH for DRG 329 improved from the 10th to 90th percentile (n = 238,907); DRG 330 improved from the 10th to the 72nd percentile (n = 285,423); DRG 331 improved from 10th to 54th percentile (n = 126,941) (P < 0.001). The RA at HCH in ERP and non-ERP cases was 3% at 30 and 90 days. CMS RA for DRG 329 was 25.1% at 90 days and 9.9% at 30 days; DRG 330 RA was 18.3% at 90 days and 6.6% at 30 days; DRG 331 RA was 11% at 90 days and 3.9% at 30 days. CONCLUSION: Implementation of ERP following bowel surgery at HCH significantly improved outcomes, in comparison to non-ERP cases, national CMS data, and Humana data. Further research on ERP for other fields and its impact on outcomes in other community settings is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10181426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101814262023-05-13 Improving Gastrointestinal Cancer Care by Enhanced Recovery Protocol Implementation Frankel, Lexi Maurente, Diego Ardeljan, Amalia D. Divesh, Manjani Rashid, Ali M. Takabe, Kazuaki Rashid, Omar M. World J Oncol Original Article BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) have become the standard of care for patients undergoing elective small bowel surgeries but have not yet been adequately studied in community hospitals. In this study, a multidisciplinary ERP was developed and implemented at a community hospital to include minimal anesthesia, early ambulation and enteral alimentation, and multimodal analgesia. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of the ERP on postoperative length of stay (LOS), readmission (RA) rates following bowel surgery, and postoperative outcomes. METHODS: The study design was a retrospective review of patients undergoing major bowel resection at Holy Cross Hospital (HCH) from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. Patient charts for diagnostic-related group (DRG) 329, 330, and 331 were retrospectively reviewed at HCH in 2017 to compare outcomes in ERP versus non-ERP cases. The Medicare claims database (CMS) was also retrospectively reviewed to compare HCH data to the national average LOS and RA for the same DRG codes. Mean values for LOS and RA were statistically compared to determine significant differences between ERP versus non-ERP patients at HCH and national CMS data versus HCH patients. RESULTS: LOS was analyzed for each DRG at HCH. At HCH, for DRG 329, the mean LOS for non-ERP was 13.0833 days (n = 12) versus 3.375 days (n = 8) (P ≤ 0.001) for ERP. For DRG 330, the mean LOS for non-ERP was 10.861 days (n = 36) versus 4.583 days (n = 24) (P ≤ 0.001) for ERP. For DRG 331, the mean LOS for non-ERP was 7.272 days (n = 11) versus 3.348 days (n = 23) (P = 0.004) for ERP. LOS was also compared to national CMS data. The LOS at HCH for DRG 329 improved from the 10th to 90th percentile (n = 238,907); DRG 330 improved from the 10th to the 72nd percentile (n = 285,423); DRG 331 improved from 10th to 54th percentile (n = 126,941) (P < 0.001). The RA at HCH in ERP and non-ERP cases was 3% at 30 and 90 days. CMS RA for DRG 329 was 25.1% at 90 days and 9.9% at 30 days; DRG 330 RA was 18.3% at 90 days and 6.6% at 30 days; DRG 331 RA was 11% at 90 days and 3.9% at 30 days. CONCLUSION: Implementation of ERP following bowel surgery at HCH significantly improved outcomes, in comparison to non-ERP cases, national CMS data, and Humana data. Further research on ERP for other fields and its impact on outcomes in other community settings is recommended. Elmer Press 2023-04 2023-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10181426/ /pubmed/37188038 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjon1534 Text en Copyright 2023, Frankel et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Frankel, Lexi
Maurente, Diego
Ardeljan, Amalia D.
Divesh, Manjani
Rashid, Ali M.
Takabe, Kazuaki
Rashid, Omar M.
Improving Gastrointestinal Cancer Care by Enhanced Recovery Protocol Implementation
title Improving Gastrointestinal Cancer Care by Enhanced Recovery Protocol Implementation
title_full Improving Gastrointestinal Cancer Care by Enhanced Recovery Protocol Implementation
title_fullStr Improving Gastrointestinal Cancer Care by Enhanced Recovery Protocol Implementation
title_full_unstemmed Improving Gastrointestinal Cancer Care by Enhanced Recovery Protocol Implementation
title_short Improving Gastrointestinal Cancer Care by Enhanced Recovery Protocol Implementation
title_sort improving gastrointestinal cancer care by enhanced recovery protocol implementation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10181426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37188038
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjon1534
work_keys_str_mv AT frankellexi improvinggastrointestinalcancercarebyenhancedrecoveryprotocolimplementation
AT maurentediego improvinggastrointestinalcancercarebyenhancedrecoveryprotocolimplementation
AT ardeljanamaliad improvinggastrointestinalcancercarebyenhancedrecoveryprotocolimplementation
AT diveshmanjani improvinggastrointestinalcancercarebyenhancedrecoveryprotocolimplementation
AT rashidalim improvinggastrointestinalcancercarebyenhancedrecoveryprotocolimplementation
AT takabekazuaki improvinggastrointestinalcancercarebyenhancedrecoveryprotocolimplementation
AT rashidomarm improvinggastrointestinalcancercarebyenhancedrecoveryprotocolimplementation