Cargando…
Facilitators and barriers in general practitioners’ choice to work in primary care units in Austria: a qualitative study
Background Recent reforms in Austria have focused on establishing team-based care within multiprofessional primary care units, to enhance amongst others, the work attractiveness of general practice. Nearly 75% of qualified general practitioners are not working as contracted physicians with the socia...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10181885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37172594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2011-5362 |
_version_ | 1785041670884032512 |
---|---|
author | Burgmann, Sarah Huter, Sebastian Mayerl, Hannes Paier-Abuzahra, Muna Siebenhofer, Andrea |
author_facet | Burgmann, Sarah Huter, Sebastian Mayerl, Hannes Paier-Abuzahra, Muna Siebenhofer, Andrea |
author_sort | Burgmann, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background Recent reforms in Austria have focused on establishing team-based care within multiprofessional primary care units, to enhance amongst others, the work attractiveness of general practice. Nearly 75% of qualified general practitioners are not working as contracted physicians with the social health insurance. This study aims to explore the facilitators of and barriers to non-contracted general practitioners to work in a primary care unit. Methods We conducted twelve semi-structured, problem-centered interviews among purposively sampled non-contracted general practitioners. To extract categories of facilitators and barriers for working in a primary care unit, transcribed interviews were inductively coded using qualitative content analysis. Subcategories were grouped into factors (facilitators and barriers) of thematic criteria and mapped on the macro-, meso-, micro-, and individual levels. Results We identified 41 categories, including 21 facilitators and 20 barriers. Most facilitators were located at the micro-level, while most barriers were located at the macro-level. Teamwork and associated conditions made primary care units attractive as workplaces and corresponded with individual demands. In contrast, system factors tended to reduce the attractiveness of working as a general practitioner. Conclusions Multifaceted efforts are needed to address relevant factors at all of the levels mentioned above. These need to be carried out and consistently communicated by all stakeholders. Efforts to strengthen the holistic approach in primary care, like modern remuneration and patient steering mechanisms, are essential. Financial support, consulting services as well as training on entrepreneurship, management, leadership, and team-based care may help to reduce the risk and burden of founding and running a primary care unit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10181885 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101818852023-05-13 Facilitators and barriers in general practitioners’ choice to work in primary care units in Austria: a qualitative study Burgmann, Sarah Huter, Sebastian Mayerl, Hannes Paier-Abuzahra, Muna Siebenhofer, Andrea Gesundheitswesen Background Recent reforms in Austria have focused on establishing team-based care within multiprofessional primary care units, to enhance amongst others, the work attractiveness of general practice. Nearly 75% of qualified general practitioners are not working as contracted physicians with the social health insurance. This study aims to explore the facilitators of and barriers to non-contracted general practitioners to work in a primary care unit. Methods We conducted twelve semi-structured, problem-centered interviews among purposively sampled non-contracted general practitioners. To extract categories of facilitators and barriers for working in a primary care unit, transcribed interviews were inductively coded using qualitative content analysis. Subcategories were grouped into factors (facilitators and barriers) of thematic criteria and mapped on the macro-, meso-, micro-, and individual levels. Results We identified 41 categories, including 21 facilitators and 20 barriers. Most facilitators were located at the micro-level, while most barriers were located at the macro-level. Teamwork and associated conditions made primary care units attractive as workplaces and corresponded with individual demands. In contrast, system factors tended to reduce the attractiveness of working as a general practitioner. Conclusions Multifaceted efforts are needed to address relevant factors at all of the levels mentioned above. These need to be carried out and consistently communicated by all stakeholders. Efforts to strengthen the holistic approach in primary care, like modern remuneration and patient steering mechanisms, are essential. Financial support, consulting services as well as training on entrepreneurship, management, leadership, and team-based care may help to reduce the risk and burden of founding and running a primary care unit. Georg Thieme Verlag 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10181885/ /pubmed/37172594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2011-5362 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Burgmann, Sarah Huter, Sebastian Mayerl, Hannes Paier-Abuzahra, Muna Siebenhofer, Andrea Facilitators and barriers in general practitioners’ choice to work in primary care units in Austria: a qualitative study |
title | Facilitators and barriers in general practitioners’ choice to
work in primary care units in Austria: a qualitative study |
title_full | Facilitators and barriers in general practitioners’ choice to
work in primary care units in Austria: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Facilitators and barriers in general practitioners’ choice to
work in primary care units in Austria: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Facilitators and barriers in general practitioners’ choice to
work in primary care units in Austria: a qualitative study |
title_short | Facilitators and barriers in general practitioners’ choice to
work in primary care units in Austria: a qualitative study |
title_sort | facilitators and barriers in general practitioners’ choice to
work in primary care units in austria: a qualitative study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10181885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37172594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2011-5362 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burgmannsarah facilitatorsandbarriersingeneralpractitionerschoicetoworkinprimarycareunitsinaustriaaqualitativestudy AT hutersebastian facilitatorsandbarriersingeneralpractitionerschoicetoworkinprimarycareunitsinaustriaaqualitativestudy AT mayerlhannes facilitatorsandbarriersingeneralpractitionerschoicetoworkinprimarycareunitsinaustriaaqualitativestudy AT paierabuzahramuna facilitatorsandbarriersingeneralpractitionerschoicetoworkinprimarycareunitsinaustriaaqualitativestudy AT siebenhoferandrea facilitatorsandbarriersingeneralpractitionerschoicetoworkinprimarycareunitsinaustriaaqualitativestudy |