Cargando…

Comparison of the 2022 and 2017 European LeukemiaNet risk classifications in a real-life cohort of the PETHEMA group

Next-Generation Sequencing is needed for the accurate genetic risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia according to European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines. We validated and compared the 2022 ELN risk classification in a real-life cohort of 546 intensively and 379 non-intensively treated patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sargas, Claudia, Ayala, Rosa, Larráyoz, María J., Chillón, María C., Rodriguez-Arboli, Eduardo, Bilbao, Cristina, Prados de la Torre, Esther, Martínez-Cuadrón, David, Rodríguez-Veiga, Rebeca, Boluda, Blanca, Gil, Cristina, Bernal, Teresa, Bergua, Juan, Algarra, Lorenzo, Tormo, Mar, Martínez-Sánchez, Pilar, Soria, Elena, Serrano, Josefina, Alonso-Dominguez, Juan M., García, Raimundo, Amigo, María Luz, Herrera-Puente, Pilar, Sayas, María J., Lavilla-Rubira, Esperanza, Martínez-López, Joaquín, Calasanz, María J., García-Sanz, Ramón, Pérez-Simón, José A., Gómez Casares, María T., Sánchez-García, Joaquín, Barragán, Eva, Montesinos, Pau
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37173322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41408-023-00835-5
_version_ 1785041707288494080
author Sargas, Claudia
Ayala, Rosa
Larráyoz, María J.
Chillón, María C.
Rodriguez-Arboli, Eduardo
Bilbao, Cristina
Prados de la Torre, Esther
Martínez-Cuadrón, David
Rodríguez-Veiga, Rebeca
Boluda, Blanca
Gil, Cristina
Bernal, Teresa
Bergua, Juan
Algarra, Lorenzo
Tormo, Mar
Martínez-Sánchez, Pilar
Soria, Elena
Serrano, Josefina
Alonso-Dominguez, Juan M.
García, Raimundo
Amigo, María Luz
Herrera-Puente, Pilar
Sayas, María J.
Lavilla-Rubira, Esperanza
Martínez-López, Joaquín
Calasanz, María J.
García-Sanz, Ramón
Pérez-Simón, José A.
Gómez Casares, María T.
Sánchez-García, Joaquín
Barragán, Eva
Montesinos, Pau
author_facet Sargas, Claudia
Ayala, Rosa
Larráyoz, María J.
Chillón, María C.
Rodriguez-Arboli, Eduardo
Bilbao, Cristina
Prados de la Torre, Esther
Martínez-Cuadrón, David
Rodríguez-Veiga, Rebeca
Boluda, Blanca
Gil, Cristina
Bernal, Teresa
Bergua, Juan
Algarra, Lorenzo
Tormo, Mar
Martínez-Sánchez, Pilar
Soria, Elena
Serrano, Josefina
Alonso-Dominguez, Juan M.
García, Raimundo
Amigo, María Luz
Herrera-Puente, Pilar
Sayas, María J.
Lavilla-Rubira, Esperanza
Martínez-López, Joaquín
Calasanz, María J.
García-Sanz, Ramón
Pérez-Simón, José A.
Gómez Casares, María T.
Sánchez-García, Joaquín
Barragán, Eva
Montesinos, Pau
author_sort Sargas, Claudia
collection PubMed
description Next-Generation Sequencing is needed for the accurate genetic risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia according to European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines. We validated and compared the 2022 ELN risk classification in a real-life cohort of 546 intensively and 379 non-intensively treated patients. Among fit patients, those aged ≥65 years old showed worse OS than younger regardless risk classification. Compared with the 2017 classification, 14.5% of fit patients changed the risk with the 2022 classification, increasing the high-risk group from 44.3% to 51.8%. 3.7% and 0.9% FLT3-ITD mutated patients were removed from the favorable and adverse 2017 categories respectively to 2022 intermediate risk group. We suggest that midostaurin therapy could be a predictor for 3 years OS (85.2% with vs. 54.8% without midostaurin, P = 0.04). Forty-seven (8.6%) patients from the 2017 intermediate group were assigned to the 2022 adverse-risk group as they harbored myelodysplasia (MDS)-related mutations. Patients with one MDS-related mutation did not reach median OS, while patients with ≥2 mutations had 13.6 months median OS (P = 0.002). Patients with TP53 ± complex karyotype or inv(3) had a dismal prognosis (7.1 months median OS). We validate the prognostic utility of the 2022 ELN classification in a real-life setting providing supportive evidences to improve risk stratification guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10182047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101820472023-05-14 Comparison of the 2022 and 2017 European LeukemiaNet risk classifications in a real-life cohort of the PETHEMA group Sargas, Claudia Ayala, Rosa Larráyoz, María J. Chillón, María C. Rodriguez-Arboli, Eduardo Bilbao, Cristina Prados de la Torre, Esther Martínez-Cuadrón, David Rodríguez-Veiga, Rebeca Boluda, Blanca Gil, Cristina Bernal, Teresa Bergua, Juan Algarra, Lorenzo Tormo, Mar Martínez-Sánchez, Pilar Soria, Elena Serrano, Josefina Alonso-Dominguez, Juan M. García, Raimundo Amigo, María Luz Herrera-Puente, Pilar Sayas, María J. Lavilla-Rubira, Esperanza Martínez-López, Joaquín Calasanz, María J. García-Sanz, Ramón Pérez-Simón, José A. Gómez Casares, María T. Sánchez-García, Joaquín Barragán, Eva Montesinos, Pau Blood Cancer J Article Next-Generation Sequencing is needed for the accurate genetic risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia according to European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines. We validated and compared the 2022 ELN risk classification in a real-life cohort of 546 intensively and 379 non-intensively treated patients. Among fit patients, those aged ≥65 years old showed worse OS than younger regardless risk classification. Compared with the 2017 classification, 14.5% of fit patients changed the risk with the 2022 classification, increasing the high-risk group from 44.3% to 51.8%. 3.7% and 0.9% FLT3-ITD mutated patients were removed from the favorable and adverse 2017 categories respectively to 2022 intermediate risk group. We suggest that midostaurin therapy could be a predictor for 3 years OS (85.2% with vs. 54.8% without midostaurin, P = 0.04). Forty-seven (8.6%) patients from the 2017 intermediate group were assigned to the 2022 adverse-risk group as they harbored myelodysplasia (MDS)-related mutations. Patients with one MDS-related mutation did not reach median OS, while patients with ≥2 mutations had 13.6 months median OS (P = 0.002). Patients with TP53 ± complex karyotype or inv(3) had a dismal prognosis (7.1 months median OS). We validate the prognostic utility of the 2022 ELN classification in a real-life setting providing supportive evidences to improve risk stratification guidelines. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10182047/ /pubmed/37173322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41408-023-00835-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Sargas, Claudia
Ayala, Rosa
Larráyoz, María J.
Chillón, María C.
Rodriguez-Arboli, Eduardo
Bilbao, Cristina
Prados de la Torre, Esther
Martínez-Cuadrón, David
Rodríguez-Veiga, Rebeca
Boluda, Blanca
Gil, Cristina
Bernal, Teresa
Bergua, Juan
Algarra, Lorenzo
Tormo, Mar
Martínez-Sánchez, Pilar
Soria, Elena
Serrano, Josefina
Alonso-Dominguez, Juan M.
García, Raimundo
Amigo, María Luz
Herrera-Puente, Pilar
Sayas, María J.
Lavilla-Rubira, Esperanza
Martínez-López, Joaquín
Calasanz, María J.
García-Sanz, Ramón
Pérez-Simón, José A.
Gómez Casares, María T.
Sánchez-García, Joaquín
Barragán, Eva
Montesinos, Pau
Comparison of the 2022 and 2017 European LeukemiaNet risk classifications in a real-life cohort of the PETHEMA group
title Comparison of the 2022 and 2017 European LeukemiaNet risk classifications in a real-life cohort of the PETHEMA group
title_full Comparison of the 2022 and 2017 European LeukemiaNet risk classifications in a real-life cohort of the PETHEMA group
title_fullStr Comparison of the 2022 and 2017 European LeukemiaNet risk classifications in a real-life cohort of the PETHEMA group
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the 2022 and 2017 European LeukemiaNet risk classifications in a real-life cohort of the PETHEMA group
title_short Comparison of the 2022 and 2017 European LeukemiaNet risk classifications in a real-life cohort of the PETHEMA group
title_sort comparison of the 2022 and 2017 european leukemianet risk classifications in a real-life cohort of the pethema group
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37173322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41408-023-00835-5
work_keys_str_mv AT sargasclaudia comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT ayalarosa comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT larrayozmariaj comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT chillonmariac comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT rodriguezarbolieduardo comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT bilbaocristina comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT pradosdelatorreesther comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT martinezcuadrondavid comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT rodriguezveigarebeca comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT boludablanca comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT gilcristina comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT bernalteresa comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT berguajuan comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT algarralorenzo comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT tormomar comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT martinezsanchezpilar comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT soriaelena comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT serranojosefina comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT alonsodominguezjuanm comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT garciaraimundo comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT amigomarialuz comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT herrerapuentepilar comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT sayasmariaj comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT lavillarubiraesperanza comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT martinezlopezjoaquin comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT calasanzmariaj comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT garciasanzramon comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT perezsimonjosea comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT gomezcasaresmariat comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT sanchezgarciajoaquin comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT barraganeva comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT montesinospau comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup
AT comparisonofthe2022and2017europeanleukemianetriskclassificationsinareallifecohortofthepethemagroup