Cargando…
A report of two cases with successful oocyte retrieval after wrongly earlier injection of ovulation induction trigger: Case report
Oocyte maturation is induced by trigger administration and is acritical step in the success of assisted reproductive technology (ART)treatment. The ideal time interval between trigger administration and oocyte retrieval varies in the literature. Extremely short or long time intervals are both knownt...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37192850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.7162 |
_version_ | 1785041738418618368 |
---|---|
author | Kabodmehri, Roya Sharami, Seyedeh Hajar Ghanami Gashti, Nasrin Hadi Bahadori, Mohammad Zahiri Sorouri, Ziba |
author_facet | Kabodmehri, Roya Sharami, Seyedeh Hajar Ghanami Gashti, Nasrin Hadi Bahadori, Mohammad Zahiri Sorouri, Ziba |
author_sort | Kabodmehri, Roya |
collection | PubMed |
description | Oocyte maturation is induced by trigger administration and is acritical step in the success of assisted reproductive technology (ART)treatment. The ideal time interval between trigger administration and oocyte retrieval varies in the literature. Extremely short or long time intervals are both knownto cause unfavorable outcomes in oocyte collection. Accurate control over theinterval between trigger injection and oocyte retrieval is very important forwomen undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), to avoid unexpected premature ovulation. In this report, we present two infertile women who mistakenly injected the triggering dose of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) 12 h earlier. Case 1 and case 2 were 23 and 30 years old, respectively. Therewas no intervention to prevent pre‐operative ovulation, and oocyte retrievalhas been done 48–50 h after trigger injection. oocytes and embryos quality wereacceptable. In conclusion, in patients who have the wrong trigger injection, oocyte retrieval is recommended after consulting the patient about theadvantages and disadvantages of the oocyte retrieval operation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10182262 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101822622023-05-14 A report of two cases with successful oocyte retrieval after wrongly earlier injection of ovulation induction trigger: Case report Kabodmehri, Roya Sharami, Seyedeh Hajar Ghanami Gashti, Nasrin Hadi Bahadori, Mohammad Zahiri Sorouri, Ziba Clin Case Rep Case Report Oocyte maturation is induced by trigger administration and is acritical step in the success of assisted reproductive technology (ART)treatment. The ideal time interval between trigger administration and oocyte retrieval varies in the literature. Extremely short or long time intervals are both knownto cause unfavorable outcomes in oocyte collection. Accurate control over theinterval between trigger injection and oocyte retrieval is very important forwomen undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), to avoid unexpected premature ovulation. In this report, we present two infertile women who mistakenly injected the triggering dose of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) 12 h earlier. Case 1 and case 2 were 23 and 30 years old, respectively. Therewas no intervention to prevent pre‐operative ovulation, and oocyte retrievalhas been done 48–50 h after trigger injection. oocytes and embryos quality wereacceptable. In conclusion, in patients who have the wrong trigger injection, oocyte retrieval is recommended after consulting the patient about theadvantages and disadvantages of the oocyte retrieval operation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10182262/ /pubmed/37192850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.7162 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Clinical Case Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Kabodmehri, Roya Sharami, Seyedeh Hajar Ghanami Gashti, Nasrin Hadi Bahadori, Mohammad Zahiri Sorouri, Ziba A report of two cases with successful oocyte retrieval after wrongly earlier injection of ovulation induction trigger: Case report |
title | A report of two cases with successful oocyte retrieval after wrongly earlier injection of ovulation induction trigger: Case report |
title_full | A report of two cases with successful oocyte retrieval after wrongly earlier injection of ovulation induction trigger: Case report |
title_fullStr | A report of two cases with successful oocyte retrieval after wrongly earlier injection of ovulation induction trigger: Case report |
title_full_unstemmed | A report of two cases with successful oocyte retrieval after wrongly earlier injection of ovulation induction trigger: Case report |
title_short | A report of two cases with successful oocyte retrieval after wrongly earlier injection of ovulation induction trigger: Case report |
title_sort | report of two cases with successful oocyte retrieval after wrongly earlier injection of ovulation induction trigger: case report |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37192850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.7162 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kabodmehriroya areportoftwocaseswithsuccessfuloocyteretrievalafterwronglyearlierinjectionofovulationinductiontriggercasereport AT sharamiseyedehhajar areportoftwocaseswithsuccessfuloocyteretrievalafterwronglyearlierinjectionofovulationinductiontriggercasereport AT ghanamigashtinasrin areportoftwocaseswithsuccessfuloocyteretrievalafterwronglyearlierinjectionofovulationinductiontriggercasereport AT hadibahadorimohammad areportoftwocaseswithsuccessfuloocyteretrievalafterwronglyearlierinjectionofovulationinductiontriggercasereport AT zahirisorouriziba areportoftwocaseswithsuccessfuloocyteretrievalafterwronglyearlierinjectionofovulationinductiontriggercasereport AT kabodmehriroya reportoftwocaseswithsuccessfuloocyteretrievalafterwronglyearlierinjectionofovulationinductiontriggercasereport AT sharamiseyedehhajar reportoftwocaseswithsuccessfuloocyteretrievalafterwronglyearlierinjectionofovulationinductiontriggercasereport AT ghanamigashtinasrin reportoftwocaseswithsuccessfuloocyteretrievalafterwronglyearlierinjectionofovulationinductiontriggercasereport AT hadibahadorimohammad reportoftwocaseswithsuccessfuloocyteretrievalafterwronglyearlierinjectionofovulationinductiontriggercasereport AT zahirisorouriziba reportoftwocaseswithsuccessfuloocyteretrievalafterwronglyearlierinjectionofovulationinductiontriggercasereport |