Cargando…

A report of two cases with successful oocyte retrieval after wrongly earlier injection of ovulation induction trigger: Case report

Oocyte maturation is induced by trigger administration and is acritical step in the success of assisted reproductive technology (ART)treatment. The ideal time interval between trigger administration and oocyte retrieval varies in the literature. Extremely short or long time intervals are both knownt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kabodmehri, Roya, Sharami, Seyedeh Hajar, Ghanami Gashti, Nasrin, Hadi Bahadori, Mohammad, Zahiri Sorouri, Ziba
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37192850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.7162
_version_ 1785041738418618368
author Kabodmehri, Roya
Sharami, Seyedeh Hajar
Ghanami Gashti, Nasrin
Hadi Bahadori, Mohammad
Zahiri Sorouri, Ziba
author_facet Kabodmehri, Roya
Sharami, Seyedeh Hajar
Ghanami Gashti, Nasrin
Hadi Bahadori, Mohammad
Zahiri Sorouri, Ziba
author_sort Kabodmehri, Roya
collection PubMed
description Oocyte maturation is induced by trigger administration and is acritical step in the success of assisted reproductive technology (ART)treatment. The ideal time interval between trigger administration and oocyte retrieval varies in the literature. Extremely short or long time intervals are both knownto cause unfavorable outcomes in oocyte collection. Accurate control over theinterval between trigger injection and oocyte retrieval is very important forwomen undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), to avoid unexpected premature ovulation. In this report, we present two infertile women who mistakenly injected the triggering dose of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) 12 h earlier. Case 1 and case 2 were 23 and 30 years old, respectively. Therewas no intervention to prevent pre‐operative ovulation, and oocyte retrievalhas been done 48–50 h after trigger injection. oocytes and embryos quality wereacceptable. In conclusion, in patients who have the wrong trigger injection, oocyte retrieval is recommended after consulting the patient about theadvantages and disadvantages of the oocyte retrieval operation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10182262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101822622023-05-14 A report of two cases with successful oocyte retrieval after wrongly earlier injection of ovulation induction trigger: Case report Kabodmehri, Roya Sharami, Seyedeh Hajar Ghanami Gashti, Nasrin Hadi Bahadori, Mohammad Zahiri Sorouri, Ziba Clin Case Rep Case Report Oocyte maturation is induced by trigger administration and is acritical step in the success of assisted reproductive technology (ART)treatment. The ideal time interval between trigger administration and oocyte retrieval varies in the literature. Extremely short or long time intervals are both knownto cause unfavorable outcomes in oocyte collection. Accurate control over theinterval between trigger injection and oocyte retrieval is very important forwomen undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), to avoid unexpected premature ovulation. In this report, we present two infertile women who mistakenly injected the triggering dose of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) 12 h earlier. Case 1 and case 2 were 23 and 30 years old, respectively. Therewas no intervention to prevent pre‐operative ovulation, and oocyte retrievalhas been done 48–50 h after trigger injection. oocytes and embryos quality wereacceptable. In conclusion, in patients who have the wrong trigger injection, oocyte retrieval is recommended after consulting the patient about theadvantages and disadvantages of the oocyte retrieval operation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10182262/ /pubmed/37192850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.7162 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Clinical Case Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Case Report
Kabodmehri, Roya
Sharami, Seyedeh Hajar
Ghanami Gashti, Nasrin
Hadi Bahadori, Mohammad
Zahiri Sorouri, Ziba
A report of two cases with successful oocyte retrieval after wrongly earlier injection of ovulation induction trigger: Case report
title A report of two cases with successful oocyte retrieval after wrongly earlier injection of ovulation induction trigger: Case report
title_full A report of two cases with successful oocyte retrieval after wrongly earlier injection of ovulation induction trigger: Case report
title_fullStr A report of two cases with successful oocyte retrieval after wrongly earlier injection of ovulation induction trigger: Case report
title_full_unstemmed A report of two cases with successful oocyte retrieval after wrongly earlier injection of ovulation induction trigger: Case report
title_short A report of two cases with successful oocyte retrieval after wrongly earlier injection of ovulation induction trigger: Case report
title_sort report of two cases with successful oocyte retrieval after wrongly earlier injection of ovulation induction trigger: case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37192850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.7162
work_keys_str_mv AT kabodmehriroya areportoftwocaseswithsuccessfuloocyteretrievalafterwronglyearlierinjectionofovulationinductiontriggercasereport
AT sharamiseyedehhajar areportoftwocaseswithsuccessfuloocyteretrievalafterwronglyearlierinjectionofovulationinductiontriggercasereport
AT ghanamigashtinasrin areportoftwocaseswithsuccessfuloocyteretrievalafterwronglyearlierinjectionofovulationinductiontriggercasereport
AT hadibahadorimohammad areportoftwocaseswithsuccessfuloocyteretrievalafterwronglyearlierinjectionofovulationinductiontriggercasereport
AT zahirisorouriziba areportoftwocaseswithsuccessfuloocyteretrievalafterwronglyearlierinjectionofovulationinductiontriggercasereport
AT kabodmehriroya reportoftwocaseswithsuccessfuloocyteretrievalafterwronglyearlierinjectionofovulationinductiontriggercasereport
AT sharamiseyedehhajar reportoftwocaseswithsuccessfuloocyteretrievalafterwronglyearlierinjectionofovulationinductiontriggercasereport
AT ghanamigashtinasrin reportoftwocaseswithsuccessfuloocyteretrievalafterwronglyearlierinjectionofovulationinductiontriggercasereport
AT hadibahadorimohammad reportoftwocaseswithsuccessfuloocyteretrievalafterwronglyearlierinjectionofovulationinductiontriggercasereport
AT zahirisorouriziba reportoftwocaseswithsuccessfuloocyteretrievalafterwronglyearlierinjectionofovulationinductiontriggercasereport