Cargando…

Levofloxacin prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia within an endemic country for carbapenem-resistant GNB

Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis’s (FQ-P) usefulness in patients with neutropenia is controversial. In recent decades, Italian epidemiological data has shown worrisome rates of FQ resistance. A single-center cohort study on 136 autologous stem cell transplantations (ASCTs) and 223 allogeneic hematopoieti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clerici, Daniela, Galli, Laura, Greco, Raffaella, Lugli, Anna P., Erbella, Federico, Ripa, Marco, Tassan Din, Chiara, Nitti, Rosamaria, Giglio, Fabio, Mastaglio, Sara, Lorentino, Francesca, Xue, Elisabetta, Farina, Francesca, Liberatore, Carmine, Poli, Andrea, Carletti, Silvia, Lupo Stanghellini, Maria T., Carrabba, Matteo G., Assanelli, Andrea A., Ruggeri, Annalisa, Bernardi, Massimo, Corti, Consuelo, Peccatori, Jacopo, Mancini, Nicasio, Scarpellini, Paolo, Ciceri, Fabio, Castagna, Antonella, Oltolini, Chiara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The American Society of Hematology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36409602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008226
_version_ 1785041739903401984
author Clerici, Daniela
Galli, Laura
Greco, Raffaella
Lugli, Anna P.
Erbella, Federico
Ripa, Marco
Tassan Din, Chiara
Nitti, Rosamaria
Giglio, Fabio
Mastaglio, Sara
Lorentino, Francesca
Xue, Elisabetta
Farina, Francesca
Liberatore, Carmine
Poli, Andrea
Carletti, Silvia
Lupo Stanghellini, Maria T.
Carrabba, Matteo G.
Assanelli, Andrea A.
Ruggeri, Annalisa
Bernardi, Massimo
Corti, Consuelo
Peccatori, Jacopo
Mancini, Nicasio
Scarpellini, Paolo
Ciceri, Fabio
Castagna, Antonella
Oltolini, Chiara
author_facet Clerici, Daniela
Galli, Laura
Greco, Raffaella
Lugli, Anna P.
Erbella, Federico
Ripa, Marco
Tassan Din, Chiara
Nitti, Rosamaria
Giglio, Fabio
Mastaglio, Sara
Lorentino, Francesca
Xue, Elisabetta
Farina, Francesca
Liberatore, Carmine
Poli, Andrea
Carletti, Silvia
Lupo Stanghellini, Maria T.
Carrabba, Matteo G.
Assanelli, Andrea A.
Ruggeri, Annalisa
Bernardi, Massimo
Corti, Consuelo
Peccatori, Jacopo
Mancini, Nicasio
Scarpellini, Paolo
Ciceri, Fabio
Castagna, Antonella
Oltolini, Chiara
author_sort Clerici, Daniela
collection PubMed
description Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis’s (FQ-P) usefulness in patients with neutropenia is controversial. In recent decades, Italian epidemiological data has shown worrisome rates of FQ resistance. A single-center cohort study on 136 autologous stem cell transplantations (ASCTs) and 223 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (allo-HSCTs) was performed from January 2018 to December 2020. Piperacillin/tazobactam was the first-line therapy for febrile neutropenia (FN). Since February 2019, FQ-P has been omitted. We evaluated the day +30 posttransplant cumulative incidence function (CIF) of gram-negative bacteria pre-engraftment bloodstream infections (PE-BSIs) and any changes in antimicrobial resistance, FN, and infection-related mortality (IRM). In ASCTs, ≥1 FN episode occurred in 74.3% of transplants, without differences among groups (P = .66). CIF of gram-negative bacteria PE-BSI was 10.1%, with a significant difference according to FQ-P (0% [LEVO-group] vs 14.1% [NO-LEVO-group], P = .016). CIF of IRM was 0% in both groups. In allo-HSCTs, ≥1 FN episode occurred in 96.4% of transplants, without differences among groups (P = .72). CIF of gram-negative bacteria PE-BSI was 28%, significantly higher without FQ-P (14.7% [LEVO-group] vs 34.4% [NO-LEVO-group], P = .003). CIF of IRM was 5%, superimposable in both groups (P = .62). Comparing antimicrobial resistance among gram-negative bacteria of allo-HSCT setting, in the group without FQ-P, a significantly higher proportion of pathogens was susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam (71% vs 30%, P = .026), FQ (49% vs 10%, P = .03), and carbapenems (95% vs 50%, P = .001). FQ-P discontinuation increased gram-negative bacteria PE-BSI but did not impact IRM, both in the ASCT and allo-HSCT settings; importantly, it concurred to significantly decrease antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bacteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10182274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The American Society of Hematology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101822742023-05-14 Levofloxacin prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia within an endemic country for carbapenem-resistant GNB Clerici, Daniela Galli, Laura Greco, Raffaella Lugli, Anna P. Erbella, Federico Ripa, Marco Tassan Din, Chiara Nitti, Rosamaria Giglio, Fabio Mastaglio, Sara Lorentino, Francesca Xue, Elisabetta Farina, Francesca Liberatore, Carmine Poli, Andrea Carletti, Silvia Lupo Stanghellini, Maria T. Carrabba, Matteo G. Assanelli, Andrea A. Ruggeri, Annalisa Bernardi, Massimo Corti, Consuelo Peccatori, Jacopo Mancini, Nicasio Scarpellini, Paolo Ciceri, Fabio Castagna, Antonella Oltolini, Chiara Blood Adv Transplantation Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis’s (FQ-P) usefulness in patients with neutropenia is controversial. In recent decades, Italian epidemiological data has shown worrisome rates of FQ resistance. A single-center cohort study on 136 autologous stem cell transplantations (ASCTs) and 223 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (allo-HSCTs) was performed from January 2018 to December 2020. Piperacillin/tazobactam was the first-line therapy for febrile neutropenia (FN). Since February 2019, FQ-P has been omitted. We evaluated the day +30 posttransplant cumulative incidence function (CIF) of gram-negative bacteria pre-engraftment bloodstream infections (PE-BSIs) and any changes in antimicrobial resistance, FN, and infection-related mortality (IRM). In ASCTs, ≥1 FN episode occurred in 74.3% of transplants, without differences among groups (P = .66). CIF of gram-negative bacteria PE-BSI was 10.1%, with a significant difference according to FQ-P (0% [LEVO-group] vs 14.1% [NO-LEVO-group], P = .016). CIF of IRM was 0% in both groups. In allo-HSCTs, ≥1 FN episode occurred in 96.4% of transplants, without differences among groups (P = .72). CIF of gram-negative bacteria PE-BSI was 28%, significantly higher without FQ-P (14.7% [LEVO-group] vs 34.4% [NO-LEVO-group], P = .003). CIF of IRM was 5%, superimposable in both groups (P = .62). Comparing antimicrobial resistance among gram-negative bacteria of allo-HSCT setting, in the group without FQ-P, a significantly higher proportion of pathogens was susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam (71% vs 30%, P = .026), FQ (49% vs 10%, P = .03), and carbapenems (95% vs 50%, P = .001). FQ-P discontinuation increased gram-negative bacteria PE-BSI but did not impact IRM, both in the ASCT and allo-HSCT settings; importantly, it concurred to significantly decrease antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bacteria. The American Society of Hematology 2022-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10182274/ /pubmed/36409602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008226 Text en © 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Transplantation
Clerici, Daniela
Galli, Laura
Greco, Raffaella
Lugli, Anna P.
Erbella, Federico
Ripa, Marco
Tassan Din, Chiara
Nitti, Rosamaria
Giglio, Fabio
Mastaglio, Sara
Lorentino, Francesca
Xue, Elisabetta
Farina, Francesca
Liberatore, Carmine
Poli, Andrea
Carletti, Silvia
Lupo Stanghellini, Maria T.
Carrabba, Matteo G.
Assanelli, Andrea A.
Ruggeri, Annalisa
Bernardi, Massimo
Corti, Consuelo
Peccatori, Jacopo
Mancini, Nicasio
Scarpellini, Paolo
Ciceri, Fabio
Castagna, Antonella
Oltolini, Chiara
Levofloxacin prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia within an endemic country for carbapenem-resistant GNB
title Levofloxacin prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia within an endemic country for carbapenem-resistant GNB
title_full Levofloxacin prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia within an endemic country for carbapenem-resistant GNB
title_fullStr Levofloxacin prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia within an endemic country for carbapenem-resistant GNB
title_full_unstemmed Levofloxacin prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia within an endemic country for carbapenem-resistant GNB
title_short Levofloxacin prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia within an endemic country for carbapenem-resistant GNB
title_sort levofloxacin prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia within an endemic country for carbapenem-resistant gnb
topic Transplantation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36409602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008226
work_keys_str_mv AT clericidaniela levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT gallilaura levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT grecoraffaella levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT lugliannap levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT erbellafederico levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT ripamarco levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT tassandinchiara levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT nittirosamaria levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT gigliofabio levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT mastagliosara levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT lorentinofrancesca levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT xueelisabetta levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT farinafrancesca levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT liberatorecarmine levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT poliandrea levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT carlettisilvia levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT lupostanghellinimariat levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT carrabbamatteog levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT assanelliandreaa levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT ruggeriannalisa levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT bernardimassimo levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT corticonsuelo levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT peccatorijacopo levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT mancininicasio levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT scarpellinipaolo levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT cicerifabio levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT castagnaantonella levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb
AT oltolinichiara levofloxacinprophylaxisvsnoprophylaxisinpatientswithneutropeniawithinanendemiccountryforcarbapenemresistantgnb