Cargando…

Effect of Immediate Referral vs a Brief Problem-solving Intervention for Screen-Detected Peripartum Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE: The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends screening adults for depression in settings with programs in place to ensure receipt of appropriate care. Best practices regarding how to ensure such care are unknown, particularly for pregnant and postpartum persons. OBJECTIVE: To compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elansary, Mei, Kistin, Caroline J., Antonio, Jocelyn, Fernández-Pastrana, Ivys, Lee-Parritz, Aviva, Cabral, Howard, Miller, Emily S., Silverstein, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37171819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.13151
_version_ 1785041766581272576
author Elansary, Mei
Kistin, Caroline J.
Antonio, Jocelyn
Fernández-Pastrana, Ivys
Lee-Parritz, Aviva
Cabral, Howard
Miller, Emily S.
Silverstein, Michael
author_facet Elansary, Mei
Kistin, Caroline J.
Antonio, Jocelyn
Fernández-Pastrana, Ivys
Lee-Parritz, Aviva
Cabral, Howard
Miller, Emily S.
Silverstein, Michael
author_sort Elansary, Mei
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends screening adults for depression in settings with programs in place to ensure receipt of appropriate care. Best practices regarding how to ensure such care are unknown, particularly for pregnant and postpartum persons. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of 2 strategies for the initial management of screen-detected peripartum depressive symptoms. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized comparative effectiveness trial was performed from February 1, 2018, to June 30, 2020, at the prenatal clinic, postpartum unit, and pediatric clinic within an urban safety-net hospital. Participants included peripartum persons with positive depression screen results. Data were analyzed from July 6, 2020, to September 21, 2022, based on intention to treat. INTERVENTIONS: Engagement-focused care coordination (EFCC), which used shared decision-making and motivational techniques to refer patients to outside mental health services, and problem-solving education (PSE), a brief cognitive-behavioral program delivered at the screening site. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome consisted of severity of depressive symptoms; secondary outcomes included severity of anxiety symptoms and engagement with care, each measured bimonthly over 12 months. Rates of symptom elevations were modeled using negative binomial regression; rates of symptom trajectories were modeled using treatment × time interactions. RESULTS: Among the 230 participants (mean [SD] age, 29.8 [5.8] years), 125 (54.3%) were Black and 101 (43.9%) were Hispanic or Latina. At baseline, 117 participants (50.9%) reported at least moderately severe depressive symptoms (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology score ≥11), and 56 (24.3%) reported clinically significant anxiety symptoms (Beck Anxiety Inventory score ≥21). Across 6 assessment time points, the mean (SD) number of moderately severe depressive symptom episodes in EFCC was 2.2 (2.2), compared with 2.2 (2.1) in PSE, for an adjusted rate ratio (aRR) of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.77-1.17). The mean (SD) number of anxiety symptom elevations in EFCC was 1.1 (1.8), compared to 1.1 (1.6) in PSE, for an aRR of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.69-1.39). There were significant treatment × time interactions relative to mean depressive symptom scores (−0.34 [95% CI, −0.60 to −0.08]; P = .009 for interaction term), favoring EFCC. There were no differences in engagement with care. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized comparative effectiveness trial, there were no differences in depressive or anxiety symptom burden across comparators; however, the evidence suggested improved depressive symptom trajectory with immediate referral. Further work is necessary to guide approaches to management following depression screening for peripartum persons. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03221556
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10182435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101824352023-05-14 Effect of Immediate Referral vs a Brief Problem-solving Intervention for Screen-Detected Peripartum Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial Elansary, Mei Kistin, Caroline J. Antonio, Jocelyn Fernández-Pastrana, Ivys Lee-Parritz, Aviva Cabral, Howard Miller, Emily S. Silverstein, Michael JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends screening adults for depression in settings with programs in place to ensure receipt of appropriate care. Best practices regarding how to ensure such care are unknown, particularly for pregnant and postpartum persons. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of 2 strategies for the initial management of screen-detected peripartum depressive symptoms. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized comparative effectiveness trial was performed from February 1, 2018, to June 30, 2020, at the prenatal clinic, postpartum unit, and pediatric clinic within an urban safety-net hospital. Participants included peripartum persons with positive depression screen results. Data were analyzed from July 6, 2020, to September 21, 2022, based on intention to treat. INTERVENTIONS: Engagement-focused care coordination (EFCC), which used shared decision-making and motivational techniques to refer patients to outside mental health services, and problem-solving education (PSE), a brief cognitive-behavioral program delivered at the screening site. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome consisted of severity of depressive symptoms; secondary outcomes included severity of anxiety symptoms and engagement with care, each measured bimonthly over 12 months. Rates of symptom elevations were modeled using negative binomial regression; rates of symptom trajectories were modeled using treatment × time interactions. RESULTS: Among the 230 participants (mean [SD] age, 29.8 [5.8] years), 125 (54.3%) were Black and 101 (43.9%) were Hispanic or Latina. At baseline, 117 participants (50.9%) reported at least moderately severe depressive symptoms (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology score ≥11), and 56 (24.3%) reported clinically significant anxiety symptoms (Beck Anxiety Inventory score ≥21). Across 6 assessment time points, the mean (SD) number of moderately severe depressive symptom episodes in EFCC was 2.2 (2.2), compared with 2.2 (2.1) in PSE, for an adjusted rate ratio (aRR) of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.77-1.17). The mean (SD) number of anxiety symptom elevations in EFCC was 1.1 (1.8), compared to 1.1 (1.6) in PSE, for an aRR of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.69-1.39). There were significant treatment × time interactions relative to mean depressive symptom scores (−0.34 [95% CI, −0.60 to −0.08]; P = .009 for interaction term), favoring EFCC. There were no differences in engagement with care. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized comparative effectiveness trial, there were no differences in depressive or anxiety symptom burden across comparators; however, the evidence suggested improved depressive symptom trajectory with immediate referral. Further work is necessary to guide approaches to management following depression screening for peripartum persons. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03221556 American Medical Association 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10182435/ /pubmed/37171819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.13151 Text en Copyright 2023 Elansary M et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Elansary, Mei
Kistin, Caroline J.
Antonio, Jocelyn
Fernández-Pastrana, Ivys
Lee-Parritz, Aviva
Cabral, Howard
Miller, Emily S.
Silverstein, Michael
Effect of Immediate Referral vs a Brief Problem-solving Intervention for Screen-Detected Peripartum Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title Effect of Immediate Referral vs a Brief Problem-solving Intervention for Screen-Detected Peripartum Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Effect of Immediate Referral vs a Brief Problem-solving Intervention for Screen-Detected Peripartum Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Effect of Immediate Referral vs a Brief Problem-solving Intervention for Screen-Detected Peripartum Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Immediate Referral vs a Brief Problem-solving Intervention for Screen-Detected Peripartum Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Effect of Immediate Referral vs a Brief Problem-solving Intervention for Screen-Detected Peripartum Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort effect of immediate referral vs a brief problem-solving intervention for screen-detected peripartum depression: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37171819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.13151
work_keys_str_mv AT elansarymei effectofimmediatereferralvsabriefproblemsolvinginterventionforscreendetectedperipartumdepressionarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kistincarolinej effectofimmediatereferralvsabriefproblemsolvinginterventionforscreendetectedperipartumdepressionarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT antoniojocelyn effectofimmediatereferralvsabriefproblemsolvinginterventionforscreendetectedperipartumdepressionarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT fernandezpastranaivys effectofimmediatereferralvsabriefproblemsolvinginterventionforscreendetectedperipartumdepressionarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT leeparritzaviva effectofimmediatereferralvsabriefproblemsolvinginterventionforscreendetectedperipartumdepressionarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT cabralhoward effectofimmediatereferralvsabriefproblemsolvinginterventionforscreendetectedperipartumdepressionarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT milleremilys effectofimmediatereferralvsabriefproblemsolvinginterventionforscreendetectedperipartumdepressionarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT silversteinmichael effectofimmediatereferralvsabriefproblemsolvinginterventionforscreendetectedperipartumdepressionarandomizedclinicaltrial