Cargando…

The effect of catheter-based sham renal denervation in hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Renal denervation (RDN) has emerged in recent years as a possible treatment for hypertension. The first sham-controlled trial showed a small magnitude and non-significant in the blood pressure (BP) lowering effect, also due to a substantial decrease of BP in sham arm. Considering this, w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fernandes, Adriana, David, Cláudio, Pinto, Fausto J, Costa, João, Ferreira, Joaquim J, Caldeira, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37173636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03269-w
_version_ 1785041790430085120
author Fernandes, Adriana
David, Cláudio
Pinto, Fausto J
Costa, João
Ferreira, Joaquim J
Caldeira, Daniel
author_facet Fernandes, Adriana
David, Cláudio
Pinto, Fausto J
Costa, João
Ferreira, Joaquim J
Caldeira, Daniel
author_sort Fernandes, Adriana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Renal denervation (RDN) has emerged in recent years as a possible treatment for hypertension. The first sham-controlled trial showed a small magnitude and non-significant in the blood pressure (BP) lowering effect, also due to a substantial decrease of BP in sham arm. Considering this, we aimed to quantify the magnitude of BP decrease within the sham arm of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) with RDN in patients with hypertension. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched since inception until January 2022 for randomized sham-controlled trials which assessed the efficacy in lowering BP of the sham intervention for catheter-based RDN in adult patients with hypertension. The outcomes were change in ambulatory/office systolic and diastolic BP. RESULTS: A total of 9 RCT were included in the analysis enrolling a total of 674 patients. Sham intervention showed a decrease in all evaluated outcomes. Office systolic BP had a reduction of -5.52 mmHg [95%CI -7.91, -3.13] and office diastolic BP of -2.13 mmHg [95%CI -3.08, -1.17]. Sham procedure for RDN also showed a reduction of -3.41 mmHg [95%CI -5.08, -1.75] in ambulatory systolic BP and − 2.44 mmHg [95%CI -3.31, -1.57] in ambulatory diastolic BP. CONCLUSION: Despite recent data indicating that RDN might be an effective treatment for patients with resistant hypertension when compared to a sham intervention, our results indicate that the sham intervention for RDN also has a significant effect on lowering Office and Ambulatory (24-h) Blood Pressure in adult patients with hypertension. This highlights that BP itself might be sensitive to placebo-like effect and also brings further difficulties in establishing the BP lowering efficacy of invasive interventions due to the magnitude of the sham effect. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-023-03269-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10182607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101826072023-05-14 The effect of catheter-based sham renal denervation in hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis Fernandes, Adriana David, Cláudio Pinto, Fausto J Costa, João Ferreira, Joaquim J Caldeira, Daniel BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research BACKGROUND: Renal denervation (RDN) has emerged in recent years as a possible treatment for hypertension. The first sham-controlled trial showed a small magnitude and non-significant in the blood pressure (BP) lowering effect, also due to a substantial decrease of BP in sham arm. Considering this, we aimed to quantify the magnitude of BP decrease within the sham arm of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) with RDN in patients with hypertension. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched since inception until January 2022 for randomized sham-controlled trials which assessed the efficacy in lowering BP of the sham intervention for catheter-based RDN in adult patients with hypertension. The outcomes were change in ambulatory/office systolic and diastolic BP. RESULTS: A total of 9 RCT were included in the analysis enrolling a total of 674 patients. Sham intervention showed a decrease in all evaluated outcomes. Office systolic BP had a reduction of -5.52 mmHg [95%CI -7.91, -3.13] and office diastolic BP of -2.13 mmHg [95%CI -3.08, -1.17]. Sham procedure for RDN also showed a reduction of -3.41 mmHg [95%CI -5.08, -1.75] in ambulatory systolic BP and − 2.44 mmHg [95%CI -3.31, -1.57] in ambulatory diastolic BP. CONCLUSION: Despite recent data indicating that RDN might be an effective treatment for patients with resistant hypertension when compared to a sham intervention, our results indicate that the sham intervention for RDN also has a significant effect on lowering Office and Ambulatory (24-h) Blood Pressure in adult patients with hypertension. This highlights that BP itself might be sensitive to placebo-like effect and also brings further difficulties in establishing the BP lowering efficacy of invasive interventions due to the magnitude of the sham effect. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-023-03269-w. BioMed Central 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10182607/ /pubmed/37173636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03269-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Fernandes, Adriana
David, Cláudio
Pinto, Fausto J
Costa, João
Ferreira, Joaquim J
Caldeira, Daniel
The effect of catheter-based sham renal denervation in hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis
title The effect of catheter-based sham renal denervation in hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The effect of catheter-based sham renal denervation in hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The effect of catheter-based sham renal denervation in hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The effect of catheter-based sham renal denervation in hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The effect of catheter-based sham renal denervation in hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effect of catheter-based sham renal denervation in hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37173636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03269-w
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandesadriana theeffectofcatheterbasedshamrenaldenervationinhypertensionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT davidclaudio theeffectofcatheterbasedshamrenaldenervationinhypertensionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pintofaustoj theeffectofcatheterbasedshamrenaldenervationinhypertensionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT costajoao theeffectofcatheterbasedshamrenaldenervationinhypertensionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ferreirajoaquimj theeffectofcatheterbasedshamrenaldenervationinhypertensionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT caldeiradaniel theeffectofcatheterbasedshamrenaldenervationinhypertensionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fernandesadriana effectofcatheterbasedshamrenaldenervationinhypertensionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT davidclaudio effectofcatheterbasedshamrenaldenervationinhypertensionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pintofaustoj effectofcatheterbasedshamrenaldenervationinhypertensionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT costajoao effectofcatheterbasedshamrenaldenervationinhypertensionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ferreirajoaquimj effectofcatheterbasedshamrenaldenervationinhypertensionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT caldeiradaniel effectofcatheterbasedshamrenaldenervationinhypertensionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis