Cargando…
Sex and gender differences in drug treatment: experiences from the knowledge database Janusmed Sex and Gender
BACKGROUND: Evidence from clinical research indicates that men and women can differ in response to drug treatment. The knowledge database Janusmed Sex and Gender was developed to illuminate potential sex and gender differences in drug therapy and, therefore, achieve a better patient safety. The data...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37173796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-023-00511-0 |
_version_ | 1785041797369561088 |
---|---|
author | Karlsson Lind, Linnéa Rydberg, Diana M. Schenck-Gustafsson, Karin |
author_facet | Karlsson Lind, Linnéa Rydberg, Diana M. Schenck-Gustafsson, Karin |
author_sort | Karlsson Lind, Linnéa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Evidence from clinical research indicates that men and women can differ in response to drug treatment. The knowledge database Janusmed Sex and Gender was developed to illuminate potential sex and gender differences in drug therapy and, therefore, achieve a better patient safety. The database contains non-commercial evidence-based information on drug substances regarding sex and gender aspects in patient treatment. Here, we describe our experiences and reflections from collecting, analyzing, and evaluating the evidence. JANUSMED SEX AND GENDER: Substances have been systematically reviewed and classified in a standardized manner. The classification considers clinically relevant sex and gender differences based on available evidence. Mainly biological sex differences are assessed except for gender differences regarding adverse effects and compliance. Of the 400 substances included in the database, clinically relevant sex differences were found for 20%. Sex-divided data were missing for 22% and no clinically relevant differences were found for more than half of the substances (52%). We noted that pivotal clinical studies often lack sex analyses of efficacy and adverse effects, and post-hoc analyzes are performed instead. Furthermore, most pharmacokinetic analyses use weight correction, but medicines are often prescribed in standard doses. In addition, few studies have sex differences as a primary outcome and some pharmacokinetic analyses are unpublished, which may complicate the classification of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Our work underlines the need of sex and gender analyses, and sex-divided data in drug treatment, to increase the knowledge about these aspects in drug treatment and contribute to a more individualized patient treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10182642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101826422023-05-14 Sex and gender differences in drug treatment: experiences from the knowledge database Janusmed Sex and Gender Karlsson Lind, Linnéa Rydberg, Diana M. Schenck-Gustafsson, Karin Biol Sex Differ Commentary BACKGROUND: Evidence from clinical research indicates that men and women can differ in response to drug treatment. The knowledge database Janusmed Sex and Gender was developed to illuminate potential sex and gender differences in drug therapy and, therefore, achieve a better patient safety. The database contains non-commercial evidence-based information on drug substances regarding sex and gender aspects in patient treatment. Here, we describe our experiences and reflections from collecting, analyzing, and evaluating the evidence. JANUSMED SEX AND GENDER: Substances have been systematically reviewed and classified in a standardized manner. The classification considers clinically relevant sex and gender differences based on available evidence. Mainly biological sex differences are assessed except for gender differences regarding adverse effects and compliance. Of the 400 substances included in the database, clinically relevant sex differences were found for 20%. Sex-divided data were missing for 22% and no clinically relevant differences were found for more than half of the substances (52%). We noted that pivotal clinical studies often lack sex analyses of efficacy and adverse effects, and post-hoc analyzes are performed instead. Furthermore, most pharmacokinetic analyses use weight correction, but medicines are often prescribed in standard doses. In addition, few studies have sex differences as a primary outcome and some pharmacokinetic analyses are unpublished, which may complicate the classification of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Our work underlines the need of sex and gender analyses, and sex-divided data in drug treatment, to increase the knowledge about these aspects in drug treatment and contribute to a more individualized patient treatment. BioMed Central 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10182642/ /pubmed/37173796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-023-00511-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Karlsson Lind, Linnéa Rydberg, Diana M. Schenck-Gustafsson, Karin Sex and gender differences in drug treatment: experiences from the knowledge database Janusmed Sex and Gender |
title | Sex and gender differences in drug treatment: experiences from the knowledge database Janusmed Sex and Gender |
title_full | Sex and gender differences in drug treatment: experiences from the knowledge database Janusmed Sex and Gender |
title_fullStr | Sex and gender differences in drug treatment: experiences from the knowledge database Janusmed Sex and Gender |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex and gender differences in drug treatment: experiences from the knowledge database Janusmed Sex and Gender |
title_short | Sex and gender differences in drug treatment: experiences from the knowledge database Janusmed Sex and Gender |
title_sort | sex and gender differences in drug treatment: experiences from the knowledge database janusmed sex and gender |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37173796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-023-00511-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karlssonlindlinnea sexandgenderdifferencesindrugtreatmentexperiencesfromtheknowledgedatabasejanusmedsexandgender AT rydbergdianam sexandgenderdifferencesindrugtreatmentexperiencesfromtheknowledgedatabasejanusmedsexandgender AT schenckgustafssonkarin sexandgenderdifferencesindrugtreatmentexperiencesfromtheknowledgedatabasejanusmedsexandgender |