Cargando…

Clinical evaluation of anterior nasal cavity swab specimens by a rapid antigen test using a GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit to diagnose COVID-19

The promising diagnostic performance of rapid antigen tests (RATs) using non-invasive anterior nasal (AN) swab specimens to diagnose COVID-19 has been reported. A large number of RATs are commercially available; however, the careful assessment of RATs is essential prior to their implementation in cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ogane, Kana, Imai, Kazuo, Orihara, Yuta, Kodana, Masahiro, Tezuka, Mariko, Matsuzaki, Nanako, Takahashi, Rina, Ichimura, Shintaro, Tokano, Mieko, Sakai, Jun, Tarumoto, Norihito, Maesaki, Shigefumi, Takuya, Maeda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, and Japanese Society for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37187412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2023.05.010
_version_ 1785041799843151872
author Ogane, Kana
Imai, Kazuo
Orihara, Yuta
Kodana, Masahiro
Tezuka, Mariko
Matsuzaki, Nanako
Takahashi, Rina
Ichimura, Shintaro
Tokano, Mieko
Sakai, Jun
Tarumoto, Norihito
Maesaki, Shigefumi
Takuya, Maeda
author_facet Ogane, Kana
Imai, Kazuo
Orihara, Yuta
Kodana, Masahiro
Tezuka, Mariko
Matsuzaki, Nanako
Takahashi, Rina
Ichimura, Shintaro
Tokano, Mieko
Sakai, Jun
Tarumoto, Norihito
Maesaki, Shigefumi
Takuya, Maeda
author_sort Ogane, Kana
collection PubMed
description The promising diagnostic performance of rapid antigen tests (RATs) using non-invasive anterior nasal (AN) swab specimens to diagnose COVID-19 has been reported. A large number of RATs are commercially available; however, the careful assessment of RATs is essential prior to their implementation in clinical practice. We evaluated the clinical performance of the GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit as a RAT using AN swabs in a prospective, blinded study. Adult patients who visited outpatient departments and received SARS-CoV-2 tests between August 16 and September 8, 2022, were eligible for this study. Patients who were aged under 18 years and patients without appropriate specimens were excluded. Two sets of AN and nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs were collected from all patients. Each set of specimens was tested by the RAT and quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Of the 138 recruited patients, 84 were positive and 54 were negative by RT-qPCR using NP swabs. The positive agreement rate between RT-qPCR using NP swabs and RAT using AN swabs was 78.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.3%–86.8%), the negative agreement rate was 98.1% (95% CI, 90.1%–99.9%), and the overall agreement rate was 86.2% (95% CI, 79.3%–91.5%), with a κ coefficient of 0.73. The positive agreement rate in the early phase (≤3 days from symptom onset) was >80%, but this fell to 50% in the late phase (≥4 days). This study demonstrates that the GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit using AN swabs has good clinical performance and might be a reliable alternative method for diagnosing COVID-19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10182653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, and Japanese Society for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101826532023-05-15 Clinical evaluation of anterior nasal cavity swab specimens by a rapid antigen test using a GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit to diagnose COVID-19 Ogane, Kana Imai, Kazuo Orihara, Yuta Kodana, Masahiro Tezuka, Mariko Matsuzaki, Nanako Takahashi, Rina Ichimura, Shintaro Tokano, Mieko Sakai, Jun Tarumoto, Norihito Maesaki, Shigefumi Takuya, Maeda J Infect Chemother Note The promising diagnostic performance of rapid antigen tests (RATs) using non-invasive anterior nasal (AN) swab specimens to diagnose COVID-19 has been reported. A large number of RATs are commercially available; however, the careful assessment of RATs is essential prior to their implementation in clinical practice. We evaluated the clinical performance of the GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit as a RAT using AN swabs in a prospective, blinded study. Adult patients who visited outpatient departments and received SARS-CoV-2 tests between August 16 and September 8, 2022, were eligible for this study. Patients who were aged under 18 years and patients without appropriate specimens were excluded. Two sets of AN and nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs were collected from all patients. Each set of specimens was tested by the RAT and quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Of the 138 recruited patients, 84 were positive and 54 were negative by RT-qPCR using NP swabs. The positive agreement rate between RT-qPCR using NP swabs and RAT using AN swabs was 78.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.3%–86.8%), the negative agreement rate was 98.1% (95% CI, 90.1%–99.9%), and the overall agreement rate was 86.2% (95% CI, 79.3%–91.5%), with a κ coefficient of 0.73. The positive agreement rate in the early phase (≤3 days from symptom onset) was >80%, but this fell to 50% in the late phase (≥4 days). This study demonstrates that the GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit using AN swabs has good clinical performance and might be a reliable alternative method for diagnosing COVID-19. Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, and Japanese Society for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023-08 2023-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10182653/ /pubmed/37187412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2023.05.010 Text en © 2023 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, and Japanese Society for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Note
Ogane, Kana
Imai, Kazuo
Orihara, Yuta
Kodana, Masahiro
Tezuka, Mariko
Matsuzaki, Nanako
Takahashi, Rina
Ichimura, Shintaro
Tokano, Mieko
Sakai, Jun
Tarumoto, Norihito
Maesaki, Shigefumi
Takuya, Maeda
Clinical evaluation of anterior nasal cavity swab specimens by a rapid antigen test using a GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit to diagnose COVID-19
title Clinical evaluation of anterior nasal cavity swab specimens by a rapid antigen test using a GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit to diagnose COVID-19
title_full Clinical evaluation of anterior nasal cavity swab specimens by a rapid antigen test using a GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit to diagnose COVID-19
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of anterior nasal cavity swab specimens by a rapid antigen test using a GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit to diagnose COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of anterior nasal cavity swab specimens by a rapid antigen test using a GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit to diagnose COVID-19
title_short Clinical evaluation of anterior nasal cavity swab specimens by a rapid antigen test using a GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit to diagnose COVID-19
title_sort clinical evaluation of anterior nasal cavity swab specimens by a rapid antigen test using a gline-2019-ncov ag kit to diagnose covid-19
topic Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37187412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2023.05.010
work_keys_str_mv AT oganekana clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19
AT imaikazuo clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19
AT oriharayuta clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19
AT kodanamasahiro clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19
AT tezukamariko clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19
AT matsuzakinanako clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19
AT takahashirina clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19
AT ichimurashintaro clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19
AT tokanomieko clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19
AT sakaijun clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19
AT tarumotonorihito clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19
AT maesakishigefumi clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19
AT takuyamaeda clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19