Cargando…
Clinical evaluation of anterior nasal cavity swab specimens by a rapid antigen test using a GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit to diagnose COVID-19
The promising diagnostic performance of rapid antigen tests (RATs) using non-invasive anterior nasal (AN) swab specimens to diagnose COVID-19 has been reported. A large number of RATs are commercially available; however, the careful assessment of RATs is essential prior to their implementation in cl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, and Japanese Society for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37187412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2023.05.010 |
_version_ | 1785041799843151872 |
---|---|
author | Ogane, Kana Imai, Kazuo Orihara, Yuta Kodana, Masahiro Tezuka, Mariko Matsuzaki, Nanako Takahashi, Rina Ichimura, Shintaro Tokano, Mieko Sakai, Jun Tarumoto, Norihito Maesaki, Shigefumi Takuya, Maeda |
author_facet | Ogane, Kana Imai, Kazuo Orihara, Yuta Kodana, Masahiro Tezuka, Mariko Matsuzaki, Nanako Takahashi, Rina Ichimura, Shintaro Tokano, Mieko Sakai, Jun Tarumoto, Norihito Maesaki, Shigefumi Takuya, Maeda |
author_sort | Ogane, Kana |
collection | PubMed |
description | The promising diagnostic performance of rapid antigen tests (RATs) using non-invasive anterior nasal (AN) swab specimens to diagnose COVID-19 has been reported. A large number of RATs are commercially available; however, the careful assessment of RATs is essential prior to their implementation in clinical practice. We evaluated the clinical performance of the GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit as a RAT using AN swabs in a prospective, blinded study. Adult patients who visited outpatient departments and received SARS-CoV-2 tests between August 16 and September 8, 2022, were eligible for this study. Patients who were aged under 18 years and patients without appropriate specimens were excluded. Two sets of AN and nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs were collected from all patients. Each set of specimens was tested by the RAT and quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Of the 138 recruited patients, 84 were positive and 54 were negative by RT-qPCR using NP swabs. The positive agreement rate between RT-qPCR using NP swabs and RAT using AN swabs was 78.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.3%–86.8%), the negative agreement rate was 98.1% (95% CI, 90.1%–99.9%), and the overall agreement rate was 86.2% (95% CI, 79.3%–91.5%), with a κ coefficient of 0.73. The positive agreement rate in the early phase (≤3 days from symptom onset) was >80%, but this fell to 50% in the late phase (≥4 days). This study demonstrates that the GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit using AN swabs has good clinical performance and might be a reliable alternative method for diagnosing COVID-19. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10182653 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, and Japanese Society for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101826532023-05-15 Clinical evaluation of anterior nasal cavity swab specimens by a rapid antigen test using a GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit to diagnose COVID-19 Ogane, Kana Imai, Kazuo Orihara, Yuta Kodana, Masahiro Tezuka, Mariko Matsuzaki, Nanako Takahashi, Rina Ichimura, Shintaro Tokano, Mieko Sakai, Jun Tarumoto, Norihito Maesaki, Shigefumi Takuya, Maeda J Infect Chemother Note The promising diagnostic performance of rapid antigen tests (RATs) using non-invasive anterior nasal (AN) swab specimens to diagnose COVID-19 has been reported. A large number of RATs are commercially available; however, the careful assessment of RATs is essential prior to their implementation in clinical practice. We evaluated the clinical performance of the GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit as a RAT using AN swabs in a prospective, blinded study. Adult patients who visited outpatient departments and received SARS-CoV-2 tests between August 16 and September 8, 2022, were eligible for this study. Patients who were aged under 18 years and patients without appropriate specimens were excluded. Two sets of AN and nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs were collected from all patients. Each set of specimens was tested by the RAT and quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Of the 138 recruited patients, 84 were positive and 54 were negative by RT-qPCR using NP swabs. The positive agreement rate between RT-qPCR using NP swabs and RAT using AN swabs was 78.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.3%–86.8%), the negative agreement rate was 98.1% (95% CI, 90.1%–99.9%), and the overall agreement rate was 86.2% (95% CI, 79.3%–91.5%), with a κ coefficient of 0.73. The positive agreement rate in the early phase (≤3 days from symptom onset) was >80%, but this fell to 50% in the late phase (≥4 days). This study demonstrates that the GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit using AN swabs has good clinical performance and might be a reliable alternative method for diagnosing COVID-19. Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, and Japanese Society for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023-08 2023-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10182653/ /pubmed/37187412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2023.05.010 Text en © 2023 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, and Japanese Society for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Note Ogane, Kana Imai, Kazuo Orihara, Yuta Kodana, Masahiro Tezuka, Mariko Matsuzaki, Nanako Takahashi, Rina Ichimura, Shintaro Tokano, Mieko Sakai, Jun Tarumoto, Norihito Maesaki, Shigefumi Takuya, Maeda Clinical evaluation of anterior nasal cavity swab specimens by a rapid antigen test using a GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit to diagnose COVID-19 |
title | Clinical evaluation of anterior nasal cavity swab specimens by a rapid antigen test using a GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit to diagnose COVID-19 |
title_full | Clinical evaluation of anterior nasal cavity swab specimens by a rapid antigen test using a GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit to diagnose COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Clinical evaluation of anterior nasal cavity swab specimens by a rapid antigen test using a GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit to diagnose COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical evaluation of anterior nasal cavity swab specimens by a rapid antigen test using a GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit to diagnose COVID-19 |
title_short | Clinical evaluation of anterior nasal cavity swab specimens by a rapid antigen test using a GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit to diagnose COVID-19 |
title_sort | clinical evaluation of anterior nasal cavity swab specimens by a rapid antigen test using a gline-2019-ncov ag kit to diagnose covid-19 |
topic | Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37187412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2023.05.010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oganekana clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19 AT imaikazuo clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19 AT oriharayuta clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19 AT kodanamasahiro clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19 AT tezukamariko clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19 AT matsuzakinanako clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19 AT takahashirina clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19 AT ichimurashintaro clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19 AT tokanomieko clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19 AT sakaijun clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19 AT tarumotonorihito clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19 AT maesakishigefumi clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19 AT takuyamaeda clinicalevaluationofanteriornasalcavityswabspecimensbyarapidantigentestusingagline2019ncovagkittodiagnosecovid19 |