Cargando…
US regulations to curb alleged cancer causes are ineffectual and compromised by scientific, constitutional and ethical violations
The 1958 Delaney amendment to the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetics Act prohibited food additives causing cancer in animals by appropriate tests. Regulators responded by adopting chronic lifetime cancer tests in rodents, soon challenged as inappropriate, for they led to very inconsistent results depen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37029818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-022-03429-5 |
_version_ | 1785041849598083072 |
---|---|
author | Gori, Gio B. Aschner, Michael Borgert, Christopher J. Cohen, Samuel M. Dietrich, Daniel R. Galli, Corrado L. Greim, Helmut Heslop-Harrison, John S. Kacew, Sam Kaminski, Norbert E. Klaunig, James E. Marquardt, Hans W.J. Pelkonen, Olavi Roberts, Ruth Savolainen, Kai M. Tsatsakis, Aristidis Yamazaki, Hiroshi |
author_facet | Gori, Gio B. Aschner, Michael Borgert, Christopher J. Cohen, Samuel M. Dietrich, Daniel R. Galli, Corrado L. Greim, Helmut Heslop-Harrison, John S. Kacew, Sam Kaminski, Norbert E. Klaunig, James E. Marquardt, Hans W.J. Pelkonen, Olavi Roberts, Ruth Savolainen, Kai M. Tsatsakis, Aristidis Yamazaki, Hiroshi |
author_sort | Gori, Gio B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The 1958 Delaney amendment to the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetics Act prohibited food additives causing cancer in animals by appropriate tests. Regulators responded by adopting chronic lifetime cancer tests in rodents, soon challenged as inappropriate, for they led to very inconsistent results depending on the subjective choice of animals, test design and conduct, and interpretive assumptions. Presently, decades of discussions and trials have come to conclude it is impossible to translate chronic animal data into verifiable prospects of cancer hazards and risks in humans. Such conclusion poses an existential crisis for official agencies in the US and abroad, which for some 65 years have used animal tests to justify massive regulations of alleged human cancer hazards, with aggregated costs of $trillions and without provable evidence of public health advantages. This article addresses suitable remedies for the US and potentially worldwide, by critically exploring the practices of regulatory agencies vis-á-vis essential criteria for validating scientific evidence. According to this analysis, regulations of alleged cancer hazards and risks have been and continue to be structured around arbitrary default assumptions at odds with basic scientific and legal tests of reliable evidence. Such practices raise a manifold ethical predicament for being incompatible with basic premises of the US Constitution, and with the ensuing public expectations of testable truth and transparency from government agencies. Potential remedies in the US include amendments to the US Administrative Procedures Act, preferably requiring agencies to justify regulations compliant with the Daubert opinion of the Daubert ruling of the US Supreme Court, which codifies the criteria defining reliable scientific evidence. International reverberations are bound to follow what remedial actions may be taken in the US, the origin of current world regulatory procedures to control alleged cancer causing agents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10182921 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101829212023-05-15 US regulations to curb alleged cancer causes are ineffectual and compromised by scientific, constitutional and ethical violations Gori, Gio B. Aschner, Michael Borgert, Christopher J. Cohen, Samuel M. Dietrich, Daniel R. Galli, Corrado L. Greim, Helmut Heslop-Harrison, John S. Kacew, Sam Kaminski, Norbert E. Klaunig, James E. Marquardt, Hans W.J. Pelkonen, Olavi Roberts, Ruth Savolainen, Kai M. Tsatsakis, Aristidis Yamazaki, Hiroshi Arch Toxicol Letter to the Editor, News and Views The 1958 Delaney amendment to the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetics Act prohibited food additives causing cancer in animals by appropriate tests. Regulators responded by adopting chronic lifetime cancer tests in rodents, soon challenged as inappropriate, for they led to very inconsistent results depending on the subjective choice of animals, test design and conduct, and interpretive assumptions. Presently, decades of discussions and trials have come to conclude it is impossible to translate chronic animal data into verifiable prospects of cancer hazards and risks in humans. Such conclusion poses an existential crisis for official agencies in the US and abroad, which for some 65 years have used animal tests to justify massive regulations of alleged human cancer hazards, with aggregated costs of $trillions and without provable evidence of public health advantages. This article addresses suitable remedies for the US and potentially worldwide, by critically exploring the practices of regulatory agencies vis-á-vis essential criteria for validating scientific evidence. According to this analysis, regulations of alleged cancer hazards and risks have been and continue to be structured around arbitrary default assumptions at odds with basic scientific and legal tests of reliable evidence. Such practices raise a manifold ethical predicament for being incompatible with basic premises of the US Constitution, and with the ensuing public expectations of testable truth and transparency from government agencies. Potential remedies in the US include amendments to the US Administrative Procedures Act, preferably requiring agencies to justify regulations compliant with the Daubert opinion of the Daubert ruling of the US Supreme Court, which codifies the criteria defining reliable scientific evidence. International reverberations are bound to follow what remedial actions may be taken in the US, the origin of current world regulatory procedures to control alleged cancer causing agents. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-04-08 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10182921/ /pubmed/37029818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-022-03429-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Letter to the Editor, News and Views Gori, Gio B. Aschner, Michael Borgert, Christopher J. Cohen, Samuel M. Dietrich, Daniel R. Galli, Corrado L. Greim, Helmut Heslop-Harrison, John S. Kacew, Sam Kaminski, Norbert E. Klaunig, James E. Marquardt, Hans W.J. Pelkonen, Olavi Roberts, Ruth Savolainen, Kai M. Tsatsakis, Aristidis Yamazaki, Hiroshi US regulations to curb alleged cancer causes are ineffectual and compromised by scientific, constitutional and ethical violations |
title | US regulations to curb alleged cancer causes are ineffectual and compromised by scientific, constitutional and ethical violations |
title_full | US regulations to curb alleged cancer causes are ineffectual and compromised by scientific, constitutional and ethical violations |
title_fullStr | US regulations to curb alleged cancer causes are ineffectual and compromised by scientific, constitutional and ethical violations |
title_full_unstemmed | US regulations to curb alleged cancer causes are ineffectual and compromised by scientific, constitutional and ethical violations |
title_short | US regulations to curb alleged cancer causes are ineffectual and compromised by scientific, constitutional and ethical violations |
title_sort | us regulations to curb alleged cancer causes are ineffectual and compromised by scientific, constitutional and ethical violations |
topic | Letter to the Editor, News and Views |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37029818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-022-03429-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gorigiob usregulationstocurballegedcancercausesareineffectualandcompromisedbyscientificconstitutionalandethicalviolations AT aschnermichael usregulationstocurballegedcancercausesareineffectualandcompromisedbyscientificconstitutionalandethicalviolations AT borgertchristopherj usregulationstocurballegedcancercausesareineffectualandcompromisedbyscientificconstitutionalandethicalviolations AT cohensamuelm usregulationstocurballegedcancercausesareineffectualandcompromisedbyscientificconstitutionalandethicalviolations AT dietrichdanielr usregulationstocurballegedcancercausesareineffectualandcompromisedbyscientificconstitutionalandethicalviolations AT gallicorradol usregulationstocurballegedcancercausesareineffectualandcompromisedbyscientificconstitutionalandethicalviolations AT greimhelmut usregulationstocurballegedcancercausesareineffectualandcompromisedbyscientificconstitutionalandethicalviolations AT heslopharrisonjohns usregulationstocurballegedcancercausesareineffectualandcompromisedbyscientificconstitutionalandethicalviolations AT kacewsam usregulationstocurballegedcancercausesareineffectualandcompromisedbyscientificconstitutionalandethicalviolations AT kaminskinorberte usregulationstocurballegedcancercausesareineffectualandcompromisedbyscientificconstitutionalandethicalviolations AT klaunigjamese usregulationstocurballegedcancercausesareineffectualandcompromisedbyscientificconstitutionalandethicalviolations AT marquardthanswj usregulationstocurballegedcancercausesareineffectualandcompromisedbyscientificconstitutionalandethicalviolations AT pelkonenolavi usregulationstocurballegedcancercausesareineffectualandcompromisedbyscientificconstitutionalandethicalviolations AT robertsruth usregulationstocurballegedcancercausesareineffectualandcompromisedbyscientificconstitutionalandethicalviolations AT savolainenkaim usregulationstocurballegedcancercausesareineffectualandcompromisedbyscientificconstitutionalandethicalviolations AT tsatsakisaristidis usregulationstocurballegedcancercausesareineffectualandcompromisedbyscientificconstitutionalandethicalviolations AT yamazakihiroshi usregulationstocurballegedcancercausesareineffectualandcompromisedbyscientificconstitutionalandethicalviolations |