Cargando…
Incidence, genetic diversity, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood in Bangkok and eastern Thailand
BACKGROUND: Emergence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus pandemic strain O3:K6 was first documented in 1996. Since then it has been accounted for large outbreaks of diarrhea globally. In Thailand, prior studies on pandemic and non-pandemic V. parahaemolyticus had mostly been done in the south. The incidence...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10183165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37193031 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15283 |
_version_ | 1785041895908442112 |
---|---|
author | Changsen, Chartchai Likhitrattanapisal, Somsak Lunha, Kamonwan Chumpol, Wiyada Jiemsup, Surasak Prachumwat, Anuphap Kongkasuriyachai, Darin Ingsriswang, Supawadee Chaturongakul, Soraya Lamalee, Aekarin Yongkiettrakul, Suganya Buates, Sureemas |
author_facet | Changsen, Chartchai Likhitrattanapisal, Somsak Lunha, Kamonwan Chumpol, Wiyada Jiemsup, Surasak Prachumwat, Anuphap Kongkasuriyachai, Darin Ingsriswang, Supawadee Chaturongakul, Soraya Lamalee, Aekarin Yongkiettrakul, Suganya Buates, Sureemas |
author_sort | Changsen, Chartchai |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Emergence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus pandemic strain O3:K6 was first documented in 1996. Since then it has been accounted for large outbreaks of diarrhea globally. In Thailand, prior studies on pandemic and non-pandemic V. parahaemolyticus had mostly been done in the south. The incidence and molecular characterization of pandemic and non-pandemic strains in other parts of Thailand have not been fully characterized. This study examined the incidence of V. parahaemolyticus in seafood samples purchased in Bangkok and collected in eastern Thailand and characterized V. parahaemolyticus isolates. Potential virulence genes, VPaI-7, T3SS2, and biofilm were examined. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles and AMR genes (ARGs) were determined. METHODS: V. parahaemolyticus was isolated from 190 marketed and farmed seafood samples by a culture method and confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The incidence of pandemic and non-pandemic V. parahaemolyticus and VPaI-7, T3SS2, and biofilm genes was examined by PCR. AMR profiles were verified by a broth microdilution technique. The presence of ARGs was verified by genome analysis. V. parahaemolyticus characterization was done by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). A phylogenomic tree was built from nucleotide sequences by UBCG2.0 and RAxML softwares. RESULTS: All 50 V. parahaemolyticus isolates including 21 pathogenic and 29 non-pathogenic strains from 190 samples had the toxRS/old sequence, indicating non-pandemic strains. All isolates had biofilm genes (VP0950, VP0952, and VP0962). None carried T3SS2 genes (VP1346 and VP1367), while VPaI-7 gene (VP1321) was seen in two isolates. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles obtained from 36 V. parahaemolyticus isolates revealed high frequency of resistance to colistin (100%, 36/36) and ampicillin (83%, 30/36), but susceptibility to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and piperacillin/tazobactam (100%, 36/36). Multidrug resistance (MDR) was seen in 11 isolates (31%, 11/36). Genome analysis revealed ARGs including blaCARB (100%, 36/36), tet(34) (83%, 30/36), tet(35) (42%, 15/36), qnrC (6%, 2/36), dfrA6 (3%, 1/36), and blaCTX-M-55 (3%, 1/36). Phylogenomic and MLST analyses classified 36 V. parahaemolyticus isolates into 5 clades, with 12 known and 13 novel sequence types (STs), suggesting high genetic variation among the isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Although none V. parahaemolyticus strains isolated from seafood samples purchased in Bangkok and collected in eastern Thailand were pandemic strains, around one third of isolates were MDR V. parahaemolyticus strains. The presence of resistance genes of the first-line antibiotics for V. parahaemolyticus infection raises a major concern for clinical treatment outcome since these resistance genes could be highly expressed under suitable circumstances. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10183165 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101831652023-05-15 Incidence, genetic diversity, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood in Bangkok and eastern Thailand Changsen, Chartchai Likhitrattanapisal, Somsak Lunha, Kamonwan Chumpol, Wiyada Jiemsup, Surasak Prachumwat, Anuphap Kongkasuriyachai, Darin Ingsriswang, Supawadee Chaturongakul, Soraya Lamalee, Aekarin Yongkiettrakul, Suganya Buates, Sureemas PeerJ Aquaculture, Fisheries and Fish Science BACKGROUND: Emergence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus pandemic strain O3:K6 was first documented in 1996. Since then it has been accounted for large outbreaks of diarrhea globally. In Thailand, prior studies on pandemic and non-pandemic V. parahaemolyticus had mostly been done in the south. The incidence and molecular characterization of pandemic and non-pandemic strains in other parts of Thailand have not been fully characterized. This study examined the incidence of V. parahaemolyticus in seafood samples purchased in Bangkok and collected in eastern Thailand and characterized V. parahaemolyticus isolates. Potential virulence genes, VPaI-7, T3SS2, and biofilm were examined. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles and AMR genes (ARGs) were determined. METHODS: V. parahaemolyticus was isolated from 190 marketed and farmed seafood samples by a culture method and confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The incidence of pandemic and non-pandemic V. parahaemolyticus and VPaI-7, T3SS2, and biofilm genes was examined by PCR. AMR profiles were verified by a broth microdilution technique. The presence of ARGs was verified by genome analysis. V. parahaemolyticus characterization was done by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). A phylogenomic tree was built from nucleotide sequences by UBCG2.0 and RAxML softwares. RESULTS: All 50 V. parahaemolyticus isolates including 21 pathogenic and 29 non-pathogenic strains from 190 samples had the toxRS/old sequence, indicating non-pandemic strains. All isolates had biofilm genes (VP0950, VP0952, and VP0962). None carried T3SS2 genes (VP1346 and VP1367), while VPaI-7 gene (VP1321) was seen in two isolates. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles obtained from 36 V. parahaemolyticus isolates revealed high frequency of resistance to colistin (100%, 36/36) and ampicillin (83%, 30/36), but susceptibility to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and piperacillin/tazobactam (100%, 36/36). Multidrug resistance (MDR) was seen in 11 isolates (31%, 11/36). Genome analysis revealed ARGs including blaCARB (100%, 36/36), tet(34) (83%, 30/36), tet(35) (42%, 15/36), qnrC (6%, 2/36), dfrA6 (3%, 1/36), and blaCTX-M-55 (3%, 1/36). Phylogenomic and MLST analyses classified 36 V. parahaemolyticus isolates into 5 clades, with 12 known and 13 novel sequence types (STs), suggesting high genetic variation among the isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Although none V. parahaemolyticus strains isolated from seafood samples purchased in Bangkok and collected in eastern Thailand were pandemic strains, around one third of isolates were MDR V. parahaemolyticus strains. The presence of resistance genes of the first-line antibiotics for V. parahaemolyticus infection raises a major concern for clinical treatment outcome since these resistance genes could be highly expressed under suitable circumstances. PeerJ Inc. 2023-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10183165/ /pubmed/37193031 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15283 Text en © 2023 Changsen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Aquaculture, Fisheries and Fish Science Changsen, Chartchai Likhitrattanapisal, Somsak Lunha, Kamonwan Chumpol, Wiyada Jiemsup, Surasak Prachumwat, Anuphap Kongkasuriyachai, Darin Ingsriswang, Supawadee Chaturongakul, Soraya Lamalee, Aekarin Yongkiettrakul, Suganya Buates, Sureemas Incidence, genetic diversity, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood in Bangkok and eastern Thailand |
title | Incidence, genetic diversity, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood in Bangkok and eastern Thailand |
title_full | Incidence, genetic diversity, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood in Bangkok and eastern Thailand |
title_fullStr | Incidence, genetic diversity, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood in Bangkok and eastern Thailand |
title_full_unstemmed | Incidence, genetic diversity, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood in Bangkok and eastern Thailand |
title_short | Incidence, genetic diversity, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood in Bangkok and eastern Thailand |
title_sort | incidence, genetic diversity, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood in bangkok and eastern thailand |
topic | Aquaculture, Fisheries and Fish Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10183165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37193031 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15283 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT changsenchartchai incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand AT likhitrattanapisalsomsak incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand AT lunhakamonwan incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand AT chumpolwiyada incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand AT jiemsupsurasak incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand AT prachumwatanuphap incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand AT kongkasuriyachaidarin incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand AT ingsriswangsupawadee incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand AT chaturongakulsoraya incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand AT lamaleeaekarin incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand AT yongkiettrakulsuganya incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand AT buatessureemas incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand |