Cargando…

Incidence, genetic diversity, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood in Bangkok and eastern Thailand

BACKGROUND: Emergence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus pandemic strain O3:K6 was first documented in 1996. Since then it has been accounted for large outbreaks of diarrhea globally. In Thailand, prior studies on pandemic and non-pandemic V. parahaemolyticus had mostly been done in the south. The incidence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Changsen, Chartchai, Likhitrattanapisal, Somsak, Lunha, Kamonwan, Chumpol, Wiyada, Jiemsup, Surasak, Prachumwat, Anuphap, Kongkasuriyachai, Darin, Ingsriswang, Supawadee, Chaturongakul, Soraya, Lamalee, Aekarin, Yongkiettrakul, Suganya, Buates, Sureemas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10183165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37193031
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15283
_version_ 1785041895908442112
author Changsen, Chartchai
Likhitrattanapisal, Somsak
Lunha, Kamonwan
Chumpol, Wiyada
Jiemsup, Surasak
Prachumwat, Anuphap
Kongkasuriyachai, Darin
Ingsriswang, Supawadee
Chaturongakul, Soraya
Lamalee, Aekarin
Yongkiettrakul, Suganya
Buates, Sureemas
author_facet Changsen, Chartchai
Likhitrattanapisal, Somsak
Lunha, Kamonwan
Chumpol, Wiyada
Jiemsup, Surasak
Prachumwat, Anuphap
Kongkasuriyachai, Darin
Ingsriswang, Supawadee
Chaturongakul, Soraya
Lamalee, Aekarin
Yongkiettrakul, Suganya
Buates, Sureemas
author_sort Changsen, Chartchai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emergence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus pandemic strain O3:K6 was first documented in 1996. Since then it has been accounted for large outbreaks of diarrhea globally. In Thailand, prior studies on pandemic and non-pandemic V. parahaemolyticus had mostly been done in the south. The incidence and molecular characterization of pandemic and non-pandemic strains in other parts of Thailand have not been fully characterized. This study examined the incidence of V. parahaemolyticus in seafood samples purchased in Bangkok and collected in eastern Thailand and characterized V. parahaemolyticus isolates. Potential virulence genes, VPaI-7, T3SS2, and biofilm were examined. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles and AMR genes (ARGs) were determined. METHODS: V. parahaemolyticus was isolated from 190 marketed and farmed seafood samples by a culture method and confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The incidence of pandemic and non-pandemic V. parahaemolyticus and VPaI-7, T3SS2, and biofilm genes was examined by PCR. AMR profiles were verified by a broth microdilution technique. The presence of ARGs was verified by genome analysis. V. parahaemolyticus characterization was done by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). A phylogenomic tree was built from nucleotide sequences by UBCG2.0 and RAxML softwares. RESULTS: All 50 V. parahaemolyticus isolates including 21 pathogenic and 29 non-pathogenic strains from 190 samples had the toxRS/old sequence, indicating non-pandemic strains. All isolates had biofilm genes (VP0950, VP0952, and VP0962). None carried T3SS2 genes (VP1346 and VP1367), while VPaI-7 gene (VP1321) was seen in two isolates. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles obtained from 36 V. parahaemolyticus isolates revealed high frequency of resistance to colistin (100%, 36/36) and ampicillin (83%, 30/36), but susceptibility to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and piperacillin/tazobactam (100%, 36/36). Multidrug resistance (MDR) was seen in 11 isolates (31%, 11/36). Genome analysis revealed ARGs including blaCARB (100%, 36/36), tet(34) (83%, 30/36), tet(35) (42%, 15/36), qnrC (6%, 2/36), dfrA6 (3%, 1/36), and blaCTX-M-55 (3%, 1/36). Phylogenomic and MLST analyses classified 36 V. parahaemolyticus isolates into 5 clades, with 12 known and 13 novel sequence types (STs), suggesting high genetic variation among the isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Although none V. parahaemolyticus strains isolated from seafood samples purchased in Bangkok and collected in eastern Thailand were pandemic strains, around one third of isolates were MDR V. parahaemolyticus strains. The presence of resistance genes of the first-line antibiotics for V. parahaemolyticus infection raises a major concern for clinical treatment outcome since these resistance genes could be highly expressed under suitable circumstances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10183165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101831652023-05-15 Incidence, genetic diversity, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood in Bangkok and eastern Thailand Changsen, Chartchai Likhitrattanapisal, Somsak Lunha, Kamonwan Chumpol, Wiyada Jiemsup, Surasak Prachumwat, Anuphap Kongkasuriyachai, Darin Ingsriswang, Supawadee Chaturongakul, Soraya Lamalee, Aekarin Yongkiettrakul, Suganya Buates, Sureemas PeerJ Aquaculture, Fisheries and Fish Science BACKGROUND: Emergence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus pandemic strain O3:K6 was first documented in 1996. Since then it has been accounted for large outbreaks of diarrhea globally. In Thailand, prior studies on pandemic and non-pandemic V. parahaemolyticus had mostly been done in the south. The incidence and molecular characterization of pandemic and non-pandemic strains in other parts of Thailand have not been fully characterized. This study examined the incidence of V. parahaemolyticus in seafood samples purchased in Bangkok and collected in eastern Thailand and characterized V. parahaemolyticus isolates. Potential virulence genes, VPaI-7, T3SS2, and biofilm were examined. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles and AMR genes (ARGs) were determined. METHODS: V. parahaemolyticus was isolated from 190 marketed and farmed seafood samples by a culture method and confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The incidence of pandemic and non-pandemic V. parahaemolyticus and VPaI-7, T3SS2, and biofilm genes was examined by PCR. AMR profiles were verified by a broth microdilution technique. The presence of ARGs was verified by genome analysis. V. parahaemolyticus characterization was done by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). A phylogenomic tree was built from nucleotide sequences by UBCG2.0 and RAxML softwares. RESULTS: All 50 V. parahaemolyticus isolates including 21 pathogenic and 29 non-pathogenic strains from 190 samples had the toxRS/old sequence, indicating non-pandemic strains. All isolates had biofilm genes (VP0950, VP0952, and VP0962). None carried T3SS2 genes (VP1346 and VP1367), while VPaI-7 gene (VP1321) was seen in two isolates. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles obtained from 36 V. parahaemolyticus isolates revealed high frequency of resistance to colistin (100%, 36/36) and ampicillin (83%, 30/36), but susceptibility to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and piperacillin/tazobactam (100%, 36/36). Multidrug resistance (MDR) was seen in 11 isolates (31%, 11/36). Genome analysis revealed ARGs including blaCARB (100%, 36/36), tet(34) (83%, 30/36), tet(35) (42%, 15/36), qnrC (6%, 2/36), dfrA6 (3%, 1/36), and blaCTX-M-55 (3%, 1/36). Phylogenomic and MLST analyses classified 36 V. parahaemolyticus isolates into 5 clades, with 12 known and 13 novel sequence types (STs), suggesting high genetic variation among the isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Although none V. parahaemolyticus strains isolated from seafood samples purchased in Bangkok and collected in eastern Thailand were pandemic strains, around one third of isolates were MDR V. parahaemolyticus strains. The presence of resistance genes of the first-line antibiotics for V. parahaemolyticus infection raises a major concern for clinical treatment outcome since these resistance genes could be highly expressed under suitable circumstances. PeerJ Inc. 2023-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10183165/ /pubmed/37193031 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15283 Text en © 2023 Changsen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Aquaculture, Fisheries and Fish Science
Changsen, Chartchai
Likhitrattanapisal, Somsak
Lunha, Kamonwan
Chumpol, Wiyada
Jiemsup, Surasak
Prachumwat, Anuphap
Kongkasuriyachai, Darin
Ingsriswang, Supawadee
Chaturongakul, Soraya
Lamalee, Aekarin
Yongkiettrakul, Suganya
Buates, Sureemas
Incidence, genetic diversity, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood in Bangkok and eastern Thailand
title Incidence, genetic diversity, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood in Bangkok and eastern Thailand
title_full Incidence, genetic diversity, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood in Bangkok and eastern Thailand
title_fullStr Incidence, genetic diversity, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood in Bangkok and eastern Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Incidence, genetic diversity, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood in Bangkok and eastern Thailand
title_short Incidence, genetic diversity, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood in Bangkok and eastern Thailand
title_sort incidence, genetic diversity, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood in bangkok and eastern thailand
topic Aquaculture, Fisheries and Fish Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10183165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37193031
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15283
work_keys_str_mv AT changsenchartchai incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand
AT likhitrattanapisalsomsak incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand
AT lunhakamonwan incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand
AT chumpolwiyada incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand
AT jiemsupsurasak incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand
AT prachumwatanuphap incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand
AT kongkasuriyachaidarin incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand
AT ingsriswangsupawadee incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand
AT chaturongakulsoraya incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand
AT lamaleeaekarin incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand
AT yongkiettrakulsuganya incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand
AT buatessureemas incidencegeneticdiversityandantimicrobialresistanceprofilesofvibrioparahaemolyticusinseafoodinbangkokandeasternthailand