Cargando…
Coercion promotes alloparental care in cooperative breeders
Members of social groups may negotiate among each other about the exchange of goods and services. If this involves asymmetries between interacting partners, for instance in condition, power, or expected payoffs, coercion may be involved in the bargain. Cooperative breeders are excellent models to st...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10183202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37192918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arac125 |
_version_ | 1785041904535076864 |
---|---|
author | Zöttl, Markus Schreier, Tanja Taborsky, Michael |
author_facet | Zöttl, Markus Schreier, Tanja Taborsky, Michael |
author_sort | Zöttl, Markus |
collection | PubMed |
description | Members of social groups may negotiate among each other about the exchange of goods and services. If this involves asymmetries between interacting partners, for instance in condition, power, or expected payoffs, coercion may be involved in the bargain. Cooperative breeders are excellent models to study such interactions, because asymmetries are inherent in the relationship between dominant breeders and subordinate helpers. Currently it is unclear whether punishment is used to enforce costly cooperation in such systems. Here we investigated experimentally in the cooperatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher whether alloparental brood care provided by subordinates is contingent on enforcement by dominant breeders. We manipulated first the brood care behavior of a subordinate group member and then the possibility of the dominant breeders to punish idle helpers. When subordinates were prevented from providing brood care, breeders increased their attacks on them, which triggered increased alloparental brood care by helpers as soon as this was again possible. In contrast, when the possibility to punish helpers was prevented, energetically costly alloparental brood care did not increase. Our results confirm predictions of the pay-to-stay mechanism causing alloparental care in this species and they suggest more generally that coercion can play an important role in the control of cooperation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10183202 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101832022023-05-15 Coercion promotes alloparental care in cooperative breeders Zöttl, Markus Schreier, Tanja Taborsky, Michael Behav Ecol Original Articles Members of social groups may negotiate among each other about the exchange of goods and services. If this involves asymmetries between interacting partners, for instance in condition, power, or expected payoffs, coercion may be involved in the bargain. Cooperative breeders are excellent models to study such interactions, because asymmetries are inherent in the relationship between dominant breeders and subordinate helpers. Currently it is unclear whether punishment is used to enforce costly cooperation in such systems. Here we investigated experimentally in the cooperatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher whether alloparental brood care provided by subordinates is contingent on enforcement by dominant breeders. We manipulated first the brood care behavior of a subordinate group member and then the possibility of the dominant breeders to punish idle helpers. When subordinates were prevented from providing brood care, breeders increased their attacks on them, which triggered increased alloparental brood care by helpers as soon as this was again possible. In contrast, when the possibility to punish helpers was prevented, energetically costly alloparental brood care did not increase. Our results confirm predictions of the pay-to-stay mechanism causing alloparental care in this species and they suggest more generally that coercion can play an important role in the control of cooperation. Oxford University Press 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10183202/ /pubmed/37192918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arac125 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Zöttl, Markus Schreier, Tanja Taborsky, Michael Coercion promotes alloparental care in cooperative breeders |
title | Coercion promotes alloparental care in cooperative breeders |
title_full | Coercion promotes alloparental care in cooperative breeders |
title_fullStr | Coercion promotes alloparental care in cooperative breeders |
title_full_unstemmed | Coercion promotes alloparental care in cooperative breeders |
title_short | Coercion promotes alloparental care in cooperative breeders |
title_sort | coercion promotes alloparental care in cooperative breeders |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10183202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37192918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arac125 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zottlmarkus coercionpromotesalloparentalcareincooperativebreeders AT schreiertanja coercionpromotesalloparentalcareincooperativebreeders AT taborskymichael coercionpromotesalloparentalcareincooperativebreeders |