Cargando…
Prognostic significance of lymph node dissection for lung cancer surgery: a narrative review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Theoretically, systematic lymph node dissection (SLND) in lung cancer surgery is a technique that leaves less cancer cells behind and is speculated to improve the prognosis, but its prognostic significance still remains controversial. In addition, the social environment sur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10183492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197508 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-1527 |
_version_ | 1785041960542666752 |
---|---|
author | Ichiki, Yoshinobu Taguchi, Ryo Yanagihara, Akitoshi Umesaki, Tetsuya Nitanda, Hiroyuki Sakaguchi, Hirozo Ishida, Hironori |
author_facet | Ichiki, Yoshinobu Taguchi, Ryo Yanagihara, Akitoshi Umesaki, Tetsuya Nitanda, Hiroyuki Sakaguchi, Hirozo Ishida, Hironori |
author_sort | Ichiki, Yoshinobu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Theoretically, systematic lymph node dissection (SLND) in lung cancer surgery is a technique that leaves less cancer cells behind and is speculated to improve the prognosis, but its prognostic significance still remains controversial. In addition, the social environment surrounding lymph node dissection has changed with the advent of limited surgery for peripheral small-sized lung cancer and emergence of immune check inhibitor (ICI). Therefore, we reconsidered the role of lymph node dissection. METHODS: By referring to past reports, we reviewed the process leading up to the establishment of SLND in lung cancer surgery. We compared five randomized prospective comparative studies on SLND and lymph node sampling (LNS) in lung cancer surgery. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Of the five randomized prospective comparative studies, two reported an improvement in overall survival (OS) with SLND, but the remaining three reported no significant difference in OS between SLND and LNS. One out of the five reports revealed a significant increase in complications with SLND. For peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases with tumor diameter ≤2 cm and consolidation-to-tumor ratio >0.5 segmentectomy was found to significantly improve the hazard ratio of OS, when compared to a lobectomy. However, the proportion of SLND and lobe-specific lymph node dissection (L-SLND) in each group seems to be unclear. In segmentectomy, the dissection of intersegmental lymph nodes tends to be lenient, and therefore it seems necessary to examine the significance of lymph node dissection in segmentectomy. ICIs are already showing excellent effects, and it may be necessary to examine how they will be affected by removal of regional lymph nodes where cancer-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) are concentrated. SLND is essential for accurate staging, but ideally—in a host with no cancer cells in the lymph node or a host with cancer cells having a high sensitivity to ICI—it might be better to leave the regional lymph node. CONCLUSIONS: SLND may not be the right choice in all cases. A time may come when the extent of lymph node dissection is determined individually for each case. Future verification results are awaited. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10183492 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101834922023-05-16 Prognostic significance of lymph node dissection for lung cancer surgery: a narrative review Ichiki, Yoshinobu Taguchi, Ryo Yanagihara, Akitoshi Umesaki, Tetsuya Nitanda, Hiroyuki Sakaguchi, Hirozo Ishida, Hironori J Thorac Dis Review Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Theoretically, systematic lymph node dissection (SLND) in lung cancer surgery is a technique that leaves less cancer cells behind and is speculated to improve the prognosis, but its prognostic significance still remains controversial. In addition, the social environment surrounding lymph node dissection has changed with the advent of limited surgery for peripheral small-sized lung cancer and emergence of immune check inhibitor (ICI). Therefore, we reconsidered the role of lymph node dissection. METHODS: By referring to past reports, we reviewed the process leading up to the establishment of SLND in lung cancer surgery. We compared five randomized prospective comparative studies on SLND and lymph node sampling (LNS) in lung cancer surgery. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Of the five randomized prospective comparative studies, two reported an improvement in overall survival (OS) with SLND, but the remaining three reported no significant difference in OS between SLND and LNS. One out of the five reports revealed a significant increase in complications with SLND. For peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases with tumor diameter ≤2 cm and consolidation-to-tumor ratio >0.5 segmentectomy was found to significantly improve the hazard ratio of OS, when compared to a lobectomy. However, the proportion of SLND and lobe-specific lymph node dissection (L-SLND) in each group seems to be unclear. In segmentectomy, the dissection of intersegmental lymph nodes tends to be lenient, and therefore it seems necessary to examine the significance of lymph node dissection in segmentectomy. ICIs are already showing excellent effects, and it may be necessary to examine how they will be affected by removal of regional lymph nodes where cancer-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) are concentrated. SLND is essential for accurate staging, but ideally—in a host with no cancer cells in the lymph node or a host with cancer cells having a high sensitivity to ICI—it might be better to leave the regional lymph node. CONCLUSIONS: SLND may not be the right choice in all cases. A time may come when the extent of lymph node dissection is determined individually for each case. Future verification results are awaited. AME Publishing Company 2023-03-27 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10183492/ /pubmed/37197508 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-1527 Text en 2023 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Ichiki, Yoshinobu Taguchi, Ryo Yanagihara, Akitoshi Umesaki, Tetsuya Nitanda, Hiroyuki Sakaguchi, Hirozo Ishida, Hironori Prognostic significance of lymph node dissection for lung cancer surgery: a narrative review |
title | Prognostic significance of lymph node dissection for lung cancer surgery: a narrative review |
title_full | Prognostic significance of lymph node dissection for lung cancer surgery: a narrative review |
title_fullStr | Prognostic significance of lymph node dissection for lung cancer surgery: a narrative review |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic significance of lymph node dissection for lung cancer surgery: a narrative review |
title_short | Prognostic significance of lymph node dissection for lung cancer surgery: a narrative review |
title_sort | prognostic significance of lymph node dissection for lung cancer surgery: a narrative review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10183492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197508 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-1527 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ichikiyoshinobu prognosticsignificanceoflymphnodedissectionforlungcancersurgeryanarrativereview AT taguchiryo prognosticsignificanceoflymphnodedissectionforlungcancersurgeryanarrativereview AT yanagiharaakitoshi prognosticsignificanceoflymphnodedissectionforlungcancersurgeryanarrativereview AT umesakitetsuya prognosticsignificanceoflymphnodedissectionforlungcancersurgeryanarrativereview AT nitandahiroyuki prognosticsignificanceoflymphnodedissectionforlungcancersurgeryanarrativereview AT sakaguchihirozo prognosticsignificanceoflymphnodedissectionforlungcancersurgeryanarrativereview AT ishidahironori prognosticsignificanceoflymphnodedissectionforlungcancersurgeryanarrativereview |