Cargando…
Intraoperative haemodynamic optimisation therapy with venoarterial carbon dioxide difference and pulse pressure variation – does it work?
BACKGROUND: Current evidence suggests that intraoperative goal-directed haemodynamic therapy (GDT) should be considered for high-risk patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery. We aimed to evaluate if an algorithm using venoarterial carbon dioxide difference (CO(2) gap) and pulse pressure v...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10183785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33165880 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2020.100636 |
_version_ | 1785042029687865344 |
---|---|
author | Prado, Lívia P. Miranda Lobo, Francisco Ricardo M. de Oliveira, Neymar E. Espada, Daniela R. P. Neves, Bárbara F. B. Teboul, Jean-Louis Lobo, Suzana Margareth A. |
author_facet | Prado, Lívia P. Miranda Lobo, Francisco Ricardo M. de Oliveira, Neymar E. Espada, Daniela R. P. Neves, Bárbara F. B. Teboul, Jean-Louis Lobo, Suzana Margareth A. |
author_sort | Prado, Lívia P. Miranda |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Current evidence suggests that intraoperative goal-directed haemodynamic therapy (GDT) should be considered for high-risk patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery. We aimed to evaluate if an algorithm using venoarterial carbon dioxide difference (CO(2) gap) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) as therapeutic targets during GDT would decrease the major complications after gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS: This was a before-and-after study (n = 204) performed in a tertiary hospital on patients who underwent elective open major gastrointestinal surgeries. The inclusion criteria were surgeries expected to last more than two hours, family and physician’s agreement on total postoperative support, and survival expectancy of at least three months. The exclusion criteria were previous haemodynamic instability, presence of infection, cardiac arrhythmias, and emergency surgery. In the intervention group (IG), an algorithm was applied using fluids, dobutamine, and noradrenaline during the intraoperative period aiming at MAP > 65 mm Hg, SpO(2) > 95%, CO(2) gap < 6 mm Hg, and PPV < 13%. The control group (CG) comprised consecutive eligible patients who were operated by the same team before the institution of the algorithm. RESULTS: The rates of moderate and severe postoperative complications were lower in the IG (11% vs. 23%; IC: RR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.246–0.929; P = 0.025). The respective 90- and 180-day mortality rates in the IG and CG were 9.8% vs. 22.5% (P = 0.014) and 12.6% vs. 25.5% (P = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: An algorithm aiming to minimise the CO(2) gap and normalise PPV was feasible and effective in decreasing rates of moderate and severe complications after surgery in high-risk patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10183785 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101837852023-05-17 Intraoperative haemodynamic optimisation therapy with venoarterial carbon dioxide difference and pulse pressure variation – does it work? Prado, Lívia P. Miranda Lobo, Francisco Ricardo M. de Oliveira, Neymar E. Espada, Daniela R. P. Neves, Bárbara F. B. Teboul, Jean-Louis Lobo, Suzana Margareth A. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther Original and Clinical Articles BACKGROUND: Current evidence suggests that intraoperative goal-directed haemodynamic therapy (GDT) should be considered for high-risk patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery. We aimed to evaluate if an algorithm using venoarterial carbon dioxide difference (CO(2) gap) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) as therapeutic targets during GDT would decrease the major complications after gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS: This was a before-and-after study (n = 204) performed in a tertiary hospital on patients who underwent elective open major gastrointestinal surgeries. The inclusion criteria were surgeries expected to last more than two hours, family and physician’s agreement on total postoperative support, and survival expectancy of at least three months. The exclusion criteria were previous haemodynamic instability, presence of infection, cardiac arrhythmias, and emergency surgery. In the intervention group (IG), an algorithm was applied using fluids, dobutamine, and noradrenaline during the intraoperative period aiming at MAP > 65 mm Hg, SpO(2) > 95%, CO(2) gap < 6 mm Hg, and PPV < 13%. The control group (CG) comprised consecutive eligible patients who were operated by the same team before the institution of the algorithm. RESULTS: The rates of moderate and severe postoperative complications were lower in the IG (11% vs. 23%; IC: RR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.246–0.929; P = 0.025). The respective 90- and 180-day mortality rates in the IG and CG were 9.8% vs. 22.5% (P = 0.014) and 12.6% vs. 25.5% (P = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: An algorithm aiming to minimise the CO(2) gap and normalise PPV was feasible and effective in decreasing rates of moderate and severe complications after surgery in high-risk patients. Termedia Publishing House 2020-10-30 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10183785/ /pubmed/33165880 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2020.100636 Text en Copyright © Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) ), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original and Clinical Articles Prado, Lívia P. Miranda Lobo, Francisco Ricardo M. de Oliveira, Neymar E. Espada, Daniela R. P. Neves, Bárbara F. B. Teboul, Jean-Louis Lobo, Suzana Margareth A. Intraoperative haemodynamic optimisation therapy with venoarterial carbon dioxide difference and pulse pressure variation – does it work? |
title | Intraoperative haemodynamic optimisation therapy with venoarterial carbon dioxide difference and pulse pressure variation – does it work? |
title_full | Intraoperative haemodynamic optimisation therapy with venoarterial carbon dioxide difference and pulse pressure variation – does it work? |
title_fullStr | Intraoperative haemodynamic optimisation therapy with venoarterial carbon dioxide difference and pulse pressure variation – does it work? |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraoperative haemodynamic optimisation therapy with venoarterial carbon dioxide difference and pulse pressure variation – does it work? |
title_short | Intraoperative haemodynamic optimisation therapy with venoarterial carbon dioxide difference and pulse pressure variation – does it work? |
title_sort | intraoperative haemodynamic optimisation therapy with venoarterial carbon dioxide difference and pulse pressure variation – does it work? |
topic | Original and Clinical Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10183785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33165880 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2020.100636 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pradoliviapmiranda intraoperativehaemodynamicoptimisationtherapywithvenoarterialcarbondioxidedifferenceandpulsepressurevariationdoesitwork AT lobofranciscoricardom intraoperativehaemodynamicoptimisationtherapywithvenoarterialcarbondioxidedifferenceandpulsepressurevariationdoesitwork AT deoliveiraneymare intraoperativehaemodynamicoptimisationtherapywithvenoarterialcarbondioxidedifferenceandpulsepressurevariationdoesitwork AT espadadanielarp intraoperativehaemodynamicoptimisationtherapywithvenoarterialcarbondioxidedifferenceandpulsepressurevariationdoesitwork AT nevesbarbarafb intraoperativehaemodynamicoptimisationtherapywithvenoarterialcarbondioxidedifferenceandpulsepressurevariationdoesitwork AT tebouljeanlouis intraoperativehaemodynamicoptimisationtherapywithvenoarterialcarbondioxidedifferenceandpulsepressurevariationdoesitwork AT lobosuzanamargaretha intraoperativehaemodynamicoptimisationtherapywithvenoarterialcarbondioxidedifferenceandpulsepressurevariationdoesitwork |