Cargando…

Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity

Objective  In around 85% of vaginal births, the parturients undergo perineal lacerations and/or episiotomy. The present study aimed to determine the incidence of lacerations and episiotomies among parturients in 2018 in a habitual-risk public maternity hospital in southern Brazil, and to determine t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Domenighi, Lauro Henrique Heinsch, Weinmann, Angela Regina Maciel, Haeffner, Leris Salete Bonfanti, Feltrin, Marcelo Lorensi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10183942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34547792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735227
_version_ 1785042065918263296
author Domenighi, Lauro Henrique Heinsch
Weinmann, Angela Regina Maciel
Haeffner, Leris Salete Bonfanti
Feltrin, Marcelo Lorensi
author_facet Domenighi, Lauro Henrique Heinsch
Weinmann, Angela Regina Maciel
Haeffner, Leris Salete Bonfanti
Feltrin, Marcelo Lorensi
author_sort Domenighi, Lauro Henrique Heinsch
collection PubMed
description Objective  In around 85% of vaginal births, the parturients undergo perineal lacerations and/or episiotomy. The present study aimed to determine the incidence of lacerations and episiotomies among parturients in 2018 in a habitual-risk public maternity hospital in southern Brazil, and to determine the risk and protective factors for such events. Methodology  A retrospective cross-sectional study. Data were obtained from medical records and analyzed using the Stata software. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed. Values of p  < 0.05 were considered significant. Results  In 2018, there were 525 vaginal births, 27.8% of which were attended by obstetricians, 70.7% by obstetric nurses, and 1.5% evolved without assistance. Overall, 55.2% of the parturients had some degree of laceration. The professional who attended the birth was a significant variable: a greater number of first- and second-degree lacerations, as well as more severe cases, occurred in births attended by nurses (odds ratio [OR]: 2,95; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1,74 to 5,03). Positions at birth that did not enable perineal protection techniques (expulsive period with the “hands-off” method), when analyzed in isolation, determined the risk; however, in the final regression model, this relationship was not confirmed. Although reported in the literature, there were no associations between the occurrence of laceration and age, skin color, or birth weight. In 24% of the births, episiotomy was performed, and doctors performed 63.5% of them. Conclusion  Births attended by nurses resulted in an increased risk of perineal lacerations, of varying degrees. In turn, those assisted by physicians had a higher occurrence of episiotomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10183942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101839422023-07-27 Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity Domenighi, Lauro Henrique Heinsch Weinmann, Angela Regina Maciel Haeffner, Leris Salete Bonfanti Feltrin, Marcelo Lorensi Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Objective  In around 85% of vaginal births, the parturients undergo perineal lacerations and/or episiotomy. The present study aimed to determine the incidence of lacerations and episiotomies among parturients in 2018 in a habitual-risk public maternity hospital in southern Brazil, and to determine the risk and protective factors for such events. Methodology  A retrospective cross-sectional study. Data were obtained from medical records and analyzed using the Stata software. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed. Values of p  < 0.05 were considered significant. Results  In 2018, there were 525 vaginal births, 27.8% of which were attended by obstetricians, 70.7% by obstetric nurses, and 1.5% evolved without assistance. Overall, 55.2% of the parturients had some degree of laceration. The professional who attended the birth was a significant variable: a greater number of first- and second-degree lacerations, as well as more severe cases, occurred in births attended by nurses (odds ratio [OR]: 2,95; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1,74 to 5,03). Positions at birth that did not enable perineal protection techniques (expulsive period with the “hands-off” method), when analyzed in isolation, determined the risk; however, in the final regression model, this relationship was not confirmed. Although reported in the literature, there were no associations between the occurrence of laceration and age, skin color, or birth weight. In 24% of the births, episiotomy was performed, and doctors performed 63.5% of them. Conclusion  Births attended by nurses resulted in an increased risk of perineal lacerations, of varying degrees. In turn, those assisted by physicians had a higher occurrence of episiotomy. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2021-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10183942/ /pubmed/34547792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735227 Text en Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Domenighi, Lauro Henrique Heinsch
Weinmann, Angela Regina Maciel
Haeffner, Leris Salete Bonfanti
Feltrin, Marcelo Lorensi
Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity
title Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity
title_full Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity
title_fullStr Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity
title_full_unstemmed Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity
title_short Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity
title_sort perineal lacerations: a retrospective study in a habitual-risk public maternity
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10183942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34547792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735227
work_keys_str_mv AT domenighilaurohenriqueheinsch perineallacerationsaretrospectivestudyinahabitualriskpublicmaternity
AT weinmannangelareginamaciel perineallacerationsaretrospectivestudyinahabitualriskpublicmaternity
AT haeffnerlerissaletebonfanti perineallacerationsaretrospectivestudyinahabitualriskpublicmaternity
AT feltrinmarcelolorensi perineallacerationsaretrospectivestudyinahabitualriskpublicmaternity