Cargando…
Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity
Objective In around 85% of vaginal births, the parturients undergo perineal lacerations and/or episiotomy. The present study aimed to determine the incidence of lacerations and episiotomies among parturients in 2018 in a habitual-risk public maternity hospital in southern Brazil, and to determine t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10183942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34547792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735227 |
_version_ | 1785042065918263296 |
---|---|
author | Domenighi, Lauro Henrique Heinsch Weinmann, Angela Regina Maciel Haeffner, Leris Salete Bonfanti Feltrin, Marcelo Lorensi |
author_facet | Domenighi, Lauro Henrique Heinsch Weinmann, Angela Regina Maciel Haeffner, Leris Salete Bonfanti Feltrin, Marcelo Lorensi |
author_sort | Domenighi, Lauro Henrique Heinsch |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective In around 85% of vaginal births, the parturients undergo perineal lacerations and/or episiotomy. The present study aimed to determine the incidence of lacerations and episiotomies among parturients in 2018 in a habitual-risk public maternity hospital in southern Brazil, and to determine the risk and protective factors for such events. Methodology A retrospective cross-sectional study. Data were obtained from medical records and analyzed using the Stata software. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant. Results In 2018, there were 525 vaginal births, 27.8% of which were attended by obstetricians, 70.7% by obstetric nurses, and 1.5% evolved without assistance. Overall, 55.2% of the parturients had some degree of laceration. The professional who attended the birth was a significant variable: a greater number of first- and second-degree lacerations, as well as more severe cases, occurred in births attended by nurses (odds ratio [OR]: 2,95; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1,74 to 5,03). Positions at birth that did not enable perineal protection techniques (expulsive period with the “hands-off” method), when analyzed in isolation, determined the risk; however, in the final regression model, this relationship was not confirmed. Although reported in the literature, there were no associations between the occurrence of laceration and age, skin color, or birth weight. In 24% of the births, episiotomy was performed, and doctors performed 63.5% of them. Conclusion Births attended by nurses resulted in an increased risk of perineal lacerations, of varying degrees. In turn, those assisted by physicians had a higher occurrence of episiotomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10183942 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101839422023-07-27 Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity Domenighi, Lauro Henrique Heinsch Weinmann, Angela Regina Maciel Haeffner, Leris Salete Bonfanti Feltrin, Marcelo Lorensi Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Objective In around 85% of vaginal births, the parturients undergo perineal lacerations and/or episiotomy. The present study aimed to determine the incidence of lacerations and episiotomies among parturients in 2018 in a habitual-risk public maternity hospital in southern Brazil, and to determine the risk and protective factors for such events. Methodology A retrospective cross-sectional study. Data were obtained from medical records and analyzed using the Stata software. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant. Results In 2018, there were 525 vaginal births, 27.8% of which were attended by obstetricians, 70.7% by obstetric nurses, and 1.5% evolved without assistance. Overall, 55.2% of the parturients had some degree of laceration. The professional who attended the birth was a significant variable: a greater number of first- and second-degree lacerations, as well as more severe cases, occurred in births attended by nurses (odds ratio [OR]: 2,95; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1,74 to 5,03). Positions at birth that did not enable perineal protection techniques (expulsive period with the “hands-off” method), when analyzed in isolation, determined the risk; however, in the final regression model, this relationship was not confirmed. Although reported in the literature, there were no associations between the occurrence of laceration and age, skin color, or birth weight. In 24% of the births, episiotomy was performed, and doctors performed 63.5% of them. Conclusion Births attended by nurses resulted in an increased risk of perineal lacerations, of varying degrees. In turn, those assisted by physicians had a higher occurrence of episiotomy. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2021-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10183942/ /pubmed/34547792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735227 Text en Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Domenighi, Lauro Henrique Heinsch Weinmann, Angela Regina Maciel Haeffner, Leris Salete Bonfanti Feltrin, Marcelo Lorensi Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity |
title | Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity |
title_full | Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity |
title_fullStr | Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity |
title_full_unstemmed | Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity |
title_short | Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity |
title_sort | perineal lacerations: a retrospective study in a habitual-risk public maternity |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10183942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34547792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735227 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT domenighilaurohenriqueheinsch perineallacerationsaretrospectivestudyinahabitualriskpublicmaternity AT weinmannangelareginamaciel perineallacerationsaretrospectivestudyinahabitualriskpublicmaternity AT haeffnerlerissaletebonfanti perineallacerationsaretrospectivestudyinahabitualriskpublicmaternity AT feltrinmarcelolorensi perineallacerationsaretrospectivestudyinahabitualriskpublicmaternity |