Cargando…
Withdrawal time in colonoscopy, past, present, and future, a narrative review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Colonoscopy is a time proven, safe, and gold standard screening method for colorectal cancer (CRC). In order to achieve its objectives, quality markers have been defined for colonoscopy, including withdrawal time (WT). WT is defined as the time spent from reaching the cecum...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197256 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tgh-23-8 |
_version_ | 1785042083916021760 |
---|---|
author | Haghbin, Hossein Zakirkhodjaev, Nuruddinkhodja Aziz, Muhammad |
author_facet | Haghbin, Hossein Zakirkhodjaev, Nuruddinkhodja Aziz, Muhammad |
author_sort | Haghbin, Hossein |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Colonoscopy is a time proven, safe, and gold standard screening method for colorectal cancer (CRC). In order to achieve its objectives, quality markers have been defined for colonoscopy, including withdrawal time (WT). WT is defined as the time spent from reaching the cecum or terminal ileum till the end of procedure in colonoscopies without any additional interventions. This review aims to provide evidence on WT efficacy and future directions. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature search of articles evaluating WT. Search was limited to English language articles from all peer-reviewed journals. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: The seminal study by Barclay et al., led to setting of a minimum WT of 6 minutes as the recommended amount for colonoscopy, per 2006 American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) taskforce. Since then, many observational studies have confirmed the efficacy of 6 minutes. Recently, multiple large multicenter trials suggest WT of 9 minutes as the alternative for better outcomes. Recently, novel Artificial Intelligence (AI) models have shown promise in improving WT and other outcomes and proved an exciting tool in the armamentarium of gastroenterologists. Some of these tools encourage the endoscopists to check the blind spots and clean the residual stool. This has shown to improve both WT and ADR. We recommend an improvement of these models to consider risk factors like adenoma detection in current and prior scopes to guide endoscopists spend time in each segment. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, new evidence demonstrates that WT of 9 minutes is better than 6 minutes. Future trends point toward an individualized AI-based approach combining real time and baseline data and guiding the endoscopist on how much time to spend in every segment of the colon in every colonoscopy procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10184034 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101840342023-05-16 Withdrawal time in colonoscopy, past, present, and future, a narrative review Haghbin, Hossein Zakirkhodjaev, Nuruddinkhodja Aziz, Muhammad Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol Review Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Colonoscopy is a time proven, safe, and gold standard screening method for colorectal cancer (CRC). In order to achieve its objectives, quality markers have been defined for colonoscopy, including withdrawal time (WT). WT is defined as the time spent from reaching the cecum or terminal ileum till the end of procedure in colonoscopies without any additional interventions. This review aims to provide evidence on WT efficacy and future directions. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature search of articles evaluating WT. Search was limited to English language articles from all peer-reviewed journals. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: The seminal study by Barclay et al., led to setting of a minimum WT of 6 minutes as the recommended amount for colonoscopy, per 2006 American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) taskforce. Since then, many observational studies have confirmed the efficacy of 6 minutes. Recently, multiple large multicenter trials suggest WT of 9 minutes as the alternative for better outcomes. Recently, novel Artificial Intelligence (AI) models have shown promise in improving WT and other outcomes and proved an exciting tool in the armamentarium of gastroenterologists. Some of these tools encourage the endoscopists to check the blind spots and clean the residual stool. This has shown to improve both WT and ADR. We recommend an improvement of these models to consider risk factors like adenoma detection in current and prior scopes to guide endoscopists spend time in each segment. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, new evidence demonstrates that WT of 9 minutes is better than 6 minutes. Future trends point toward an individualized AI-based approach combining real time and baseline data and guiding the endoscopist on how much time to spend in every segment of the colon in every colonoscopy procedure. AME Publishing Company 2023-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10184034/ /pubmed/37197256 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tgh-23-8 Text en 2023 Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Haghbin, Hossein Zakirkhodjaev, Nuruddinkhodja Aziz, Muhammad Withdrawal time in colonoscopy, past, present, and future, a narrative review |
title | Withdrawal time in colonoscopy, past, present, and future, a narrative review |
title_full | Withdrawal time in colonoscopy, past, present, and future, a narrative review |
title_fullStr | Withdrawal time in colonoscopy, past, present, and future, a narrative review |
title_full_unstemmed | Withdrawal time in colonoscopy, past, present, and future, a narrative review |
title_short | Withdrawal time in colonoscopy, past, present, and future, a narrative review |
title_sort | withdrawal time in colonoscopy, past, present, and future, a narrative review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197256 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tgh-23-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haghbinhossein withdrawaltimeincolonoscopypastpresentandfutureanarrativereview AT zakirkhodjaevnuruddinkhodja withdrawaltimeincolonoscopypastpresentandfutureanarrativereview AT azizmuhammad withdrawaltimeincolonoscopypastpresentandfutureanarrativereview |