Cargando…
Management of Incisional Self-Harm of the Upper Limb: A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: The incidence of incisional self-harm of the upper limbs is increasing, and recurrence rates are high. It is not known whether different wound treatment strategies (dressings only vs. surgery) or the operative setting (main theatre vs. non-main theatre) affect wound or mental health-rela...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2023.01.003 |
_version_ | 1785042085355716608 |
---|---|
author | Somanathan, Arun Lee, Alice Harrison, Conrad J. Rodrigues, Jeremy N. |
author_facet | Somanathan, Arun Lee, Alice Harrison, Conrad J. Rodrigues, Jeremy N. |
author_sort | Somanathan, Arun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The incidence of incisional self-harm of the upper limbs is increasing, and recurrence rates are high. It is not known whether different wound treatment strategies (dressings only vs. surgery) or the operative setting (main theatre vs. non-main theatre) affect wound or mental health-related outcomes. METHODS: Four electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, OVID EMBASE, PsycINFO and CENTRAL) were searched from inception to 14/09/2021 for studies which describe the management of incisional self-harm wounds of the upper limb(s) in adults and children. Dual-author screening and data extraction were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: In total, 19 studies (1477 patients) were included. Overall, the evidence was limited by a paucity of comparative data on wound management strategy and setting, and poor-quality outcome reporting. Only four studies clearly identified the operative setting for definitive wound management (two in main operating theatres, one in the emergency department and one using both settings, depending on injury severity). Few studies inconsistently reported surgical outcomes (n=9) or mental health outcomes (n=4), hindering evidence synthesis. CONCLUSION: Further investigation is needed to determine the most cost-effective management strategies and settings for these injuries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10184042 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101840422023-05-16 Management of Incisional Self-Harm of the Upper Limb: A Systematic Review Somanathan, Arun Lee, Alice Harrison, Conrad J. Rodrigues, Jeremy N. JPRAS Open Review Article BACKGROUND: The incidence of incisional self-harm of the upper limbs is increasing, and recurrence rates are high. It is not known whether different wound treatment strategies (dressings only vs. surgery) or the operative setting (main theatre vs. non-main theatre) affect wound or mental health-related outcomes. METHODS: Four electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, OVID EMBASE, PsycINFO and CENTRAL) were searched from inception to 14/09/2021 for studies which describe the management of incisional self-harm wounds of the upper limb(s) in adults and children. Dual-author screening and data extraction were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: In total, 19 studies (1477 patients) were included. Overall, the evidence was limited by a paucity of comparative data on wound management strategy and setting, and poor-quality outcome reporting. Only four studies clearly identified the operative setting for definitive wound management (two in main operating theatres, one in the emergency department and one using both settings, depending on injury severity). Few studies inconsistently reported surgical outcomes (n=9) or mental health outcomes (n=4), hindering evidence synthesis. CONCLUSION: Further investigation is needed to determine the most cost-effective management strategies and settings for these injuries. Elsevier 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10184042/ /pubmed/37197690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2023.01.003 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Somanathan, Arun Lee, Alice Harrison, Conrad J. Rodrigues, Jeremy N. Management of Incisional Self-Harm of the Upper Limb: A Systematic Review |
title | Management of Incisional Self-Harm of the Upper Limb: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Management of Incisional Self-Harm of the Upper Limb: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Management of Incisional Self-Harm of the Upper Limb: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Management of Incisional Self-Harm of the Upper Limb: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Management of Incisional Self-Harm of the Upper Limb: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | management of incisional self-harm of the upper limb: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2023.01.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT somanathanarun managementofincisionalselfharmoftheupperlimbasystematicreview AT leealice managementofincisionalselfharmoftheupperlimbasystematicreview AT harrisonconradj managementofincisionalselfharmoftheupperlimbasystematicreview AT rodriguesjeremyn managementofincisionalselfharmoftheupperlimbasystematicreview |