Cargando…

Management of Incisional Self-Harm of the Upper Limb: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: The incidence of incisional self-harm of the upper limbs is increasing, and recurrence rates are high. It is not known whether different wound treatment strategies (dressings only vs. surgery) or the operative setting (main theatre vs. non-main theatre) affect wound or mental health-rela...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Somanathan, Arun, Lee, Alice, Harrison, Conrad J., Rodrigues, Jeremy N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2023.01.003
_version_ 1785042085355716608
author Somanathan, Arun
Lee, Alice
Harrison, Conrad J.
Rodrigues, Jeremy N.
author_facet Somanathan, Arun
Lee, Alice
Harrison, Conrad J.
Rodrigues, Jeremy N.
author_sort Somanathan, Arun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The incidence of incisional self-harm of the upper limbs is increasing, and recurrence rates are high. It is not known whether different wound treatment strategies (dressings only vs. surgery) or the operative setting (main theatre vs. non-main theatre) affect wound or mental health-related outcomes. METHODS: Four electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, OVID EMBASE, PsycINFO and CENTRAL) were searched from inception to 14/09/2021 for studies which describe the management of incisional self-harm wounds of the upper limb(s) in adults and children. Dual-author screening and data extraction were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: In total, 19 studies (1477 patients) were included. Overall, the evidence was limited by a paucity of comparative data on wound management strategy and setting, and poor-quality outcome reporting. Only four studies clearly identified the operative setting for definitive wound management (two in main operating theatres, one in the emergency department and one using both settings, depending on injury severity). Few studies inconsistently reported surgical outcomes (n=9) or mental health outcomes (n=4), hindering evidence synthesis. CONCLUSION: Further investigation is needed to determine the most cost-effective management strategies and settings for these injuries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10184042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101840422023-05-16 Management of Incisional Self-Harm of the Upper Limb: A Systematic Review Somanathan, Arun Lee, Alice Harrison, Conrad J. Rodrigues, Jeremy N. JPRAS Open Review Article BACKGROUND: The incidence of incisional self-harm of the upper limbs is increasing, and recurrence rates are high. It is not known whether different wound treatment strategies (dressings only vs. surgery) or the operative setting (main theatre vs. non-main theatre) affect wound or mental health-related outcomes. METHODS: Four electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, OVID EMBASE, PsycINFO and CENTRAL) were searched from inception to 14/09/2021 for studies which describe the management of incisional self-harm wounds of the upper limb(s) in adults and children. Dual-author screening and data extraction were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: In total, 19 studies (1477 patients) were included. Overall, the evidence was limited by a paucity of comparative data on wound management strategy and setting, and poor-quality outcome reporting. Only four studies clearly identified the operative setting for definitive wound management (two in main operating theatres, one in the emergency department and one using both settings, depending on injury severity). Few studies inconsistently reported surgical outcomes (n=9) or mental health outcomes (n=4), hindering evidence synthesis. CONCLUSION: Further investigation is needed to determine the most cost-effective management strategies and settings for these injuries. Elsevier 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10184042/ /pubmed/37197690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2023.01.003 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Somanathan, Arun
Lee, Alice
Harrison, Conrad J.
Rodrigues, Jeremy N.
Management of Incisional Self-Harm of the Upper Limb: A Systematic Review
title Management of Incisional Self-Harm of the Upper Limb: A Systematic Review
title_full Management of Incisional Self-Harm of the Upper Limb: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Management of Incisional Self-Harm of the Upper Limb: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Management of Incisional Self-Harm of the Upper Limb: A Systematic Review
title_short Management of Incisional Self-Harm of the Upper Limb: A Systematic Review
title_sort management of incisional self-harm of the upper limb: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2023.01.003
work_keys_str_mv AT somanathanarun managementofincisionalselfharmoftheupperlimbasystematicreview
AT leealice managementofincisionalselfharmoftheupperlimbasystematicreview
AT harrisonconradj managementofincisionalselfharmoftheupperlimbasystematicreview
AT rodriguesjeremyn managementofincisionalselfharmoftheupperlimbasystematicreview