Cargando…

Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of structured programming and a parent intervention to mitigate accelerated summer BMI gain: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the initial feasibility and preliminary efficacy of providing children a free summer day camp and a parent intervention to improve self-regulation and mitigate accelerated summer BMI gain. METHODS: This pilot 2x2 factorial randomized control trial used a mixed-methods...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weaver, R. G., Armstrong, B., Adams, E., Beets, M. W., White, J., Flory, K., Wilson, D., McLain, A., Tennie, B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37189190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01312-3
_version_ 1785042089418948608
author Weaver, R. G.
Armstrong, B.
Adams, E.
Beets, M. W.
White, J.
Flory, K.
Wilson, D.
McLain, A.
Tennie, B.
author_facet Weaver, R. G.
Armstrong, B.
Adams, E.
Beets, M. W.
White, J.
Flory, K.
Wilson, D.
McLain, A.
Tennie, B.
author_sort Weaver, R. G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study assessed the initial feasibility and preliminary efficacy of providing children a free summer day camp and a parent intervention to improve self-regulation and mitigate accelerated summer BMI gain. METHODS: This pilot 2x2 factorial randomized control trial used a mixed-methods design to evaluate providing children a free summer day camp (SCV), a parent intervention (PI), and the combination of these two strategies (SCV+PI) to mitigate accelerated summer body mass index (BMI) gain. Progression criteria for feasibility and efficacy were assessed to determine if a full-scale trial was warranted. Feasibility criteria included recruitment capability (≥80 participants recruited) retention (≥70% participants retained), compliance (≥80% of participants attending the summer program with children attending ≥60% of program days, and ≥80% of participants completing goal setting calls with ≥60% of weeks syncing their child’s Fitbit), and treatment fidelity (≥80% of summer program days delivered for ≥9 h/day, and ≥80% of participant texts delivered). Efficacy criteria were assessed via achieving a clinically meaningful impact on zBMI (i.e., ≥0.15). Changes in BMI were estimated using intent-to-treat and post hoc dose-response analyses via multilevel mixed-effects regressions. RESULTS: For recruitment, capability and retention progression criteria were met with a total of 89 families participating and 24 participants randomized to the PI group, 21 randomized to the SCV group, 23 randomized to the SCV+PI group, and 21 randomized to the control. However, fidelity and compliance progression criteria were not achieved due to COVID-19 and lack of transportation. Progression criteria for efficacy was also not achieved as intent-to-treat analyses did not show changes in BMI gain that were clinically meaningful. Post hoc dose-response analyses showed that for each day (0 to 29) of summer programming children attended they gained −0.009 (95CI= −0.018, −0.001) less in BMI z score. CONCLUSIONS: Engagement in both the SCV and PI was not ideal due to COVID-19 and lack of transportation. Providing children with structured summer programming to mitigate accelerated summer BMI gain may be an effective strategy. However, because feasibility and efficacy progression criteria were not met, a larger trial is not warranted until further pilot work is completed to ensure children attend the programming. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial reported herein was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Trial #: NCT04608188.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10184061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101840612023-05-16 Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of structured programming and a parent intervention to mitigate accelerated summer BMI gain: a pilot study Weaver, R. G. Armstrong, B. Adams, E. Beets, M. W. White, J. Flory, K. Wilson, D. McLain, A. Tennie, B. Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: This study assessed the initial feasibility and preliminary efficacy of providing children a free summer day camp and a parent intervention to improve self-regulation and mitigate accelerated summer BMI gain. METHODS: This pilot 2x2 factorial randomized control trial used a mixed-methods design to evaluate providing children a free summer day camp (SCV), a parent intervention (PI), and the combination of these two strategies (SCV+PI) to mitigate accelerated summer body mass index (BMI) gain. Progression criteria for feasibility and efficacy were assessed to determine if a full-scale trial was warranted. Feasibility criteria included recruitment capability (≥80 participants recruited) retention (≥70% participants retained), compliance (≥80% of participants attending the summer program with children attending ≥60% of program days, and ≥80% of participants completing goal setting calls with ≥60% of weeks syncing their child’s Fitbit), and treatment fidelity (≥80% of summer program days delivered for ≥9 h/day, and ≥80% of participant texts delivered). Efficacy criteria were assessed via achieving a clinically meaningful impact on zBMI (i.e., ≥0.15). Changes in BMI were estimated using intent-to-treat and post hoc dose-response analyses via multilevel mixed-effects regressions. RESULTS: For recruitment, capability and retention progression criteria were met with a total of 89 families participating and 24 participants randomized to the PI group, 21 randomized to the SCV group, 23 randomized to the SCV+PI group, and 21 randomized to the control. However, fidelity and compliance progression criteria were not achieved due to COVID-19 and lack of transportation. Progression criteria for efficacy was also not achieved as intent-to-treat analyses did not show changes in BMI gain that were clinically meaningful. Post hoc dose-response analyses showed that for each day (0 to 29) of summer programming children attended they gained −0.009 (95CI= −0.018, −0.001) less in BMI z score. CONCLUSIONS: Engagement in both the SCV and PI was not ideal due to COVID-19 and lack of transportation. Providing children with structured summer programming to mitigate accelerated summer BMI gain may be an effective strategy. However, because feasibility and efficacy progression criteria were not met, a larger trial is not warranted until further pilot work is completed to ensure children attend the programming. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial reported herein was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Trial #: NCT04608188. BioMed Central 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10184061/ /pubmed/37189190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01312-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Weaver, R. G.
Armstrong, B.
Adams, E.
Beets, M. W.
White, J.
Flory, K.
Wilson, D.
McLain, A.
Tennie, B.
Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of structured programming and a parent intervention to mitigate accelerated summer BMI gain: a pilot study
title Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of structured programming and a parent intervention to mitigate accelerated summer BMI gain: a pilot study
title_full Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of structured programming and a parent intervention to mitigate accelerated summer BMI gain: a pilot study
title_fullStr Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of structured programming and a parent intervention to mitigate accelerated summer BMI gain: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of structured programming and a parent intervention to mitigate accelerated summer BMI gain: a pilot study
title_short Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of structured programming and a parent intervention to mitigate accelerated summer BMI gain: a pilot study
title_sort feasibility and preliminary efficacy of structured programming and a parent intervention to mitigate accelerated summer bmi gain: a pilot study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37189190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01312-3
work_keys_str_mv AT weaverrg feasibilityandpreliminaryefficacyofstructuredprogrammingandaparentinterventiontomitigateacceleratedsummerbmigainapilotstudy
AT armstrongb feasibilityandpreliminaryefficacyofstructuredprogrammingandaparentinterventiontomitigateacceleratedsummerbmigainapilotstudy
AT adamse feasibilityandpreliminaryefficacyofstructuredprogrammingandaparentinterventiontomitigateacceleratedsummerbmigainapilotstudy
AT beetsmw feasibilityandpreliminaryefficacyofstructuredprogrammingandaparentinterventiontomitigateacceleratedsummerbmigainapilotstudy
AT whitej feasibilityandpreliminaryefficacyofstructuredprogrammingandaparentinterventiontomitigateacceleratedsummerbmigainapilotstudy
AT floryk feasibilityandpreliminaryefficacyofstructuredprogrammingandaparentinterventiontomitigateacceleratedsummerbmigainapilotstudy
AT wilsond feasibilityandpreliminaryefficacyofstructuredprogrammingandaparentinterventiontomitigateacceleratedsummerbmigainapilotstudy
AT mclaina feasibilityandpreliminaryefficacyofstructuredprogrammingandaparentinterventiontomitigateacceleratedsummerbmigainapilotstudy
AT tennieb feasibilityandpreliminaryefficacyofstructuredprogrammingandaparentinterventiontomitigateacceleratedsummerbmigainapilotstudy