Cargando…

Challenging Diagnosis of Intrapancreatic Accessory Spleen in the Tail of the Pancreas: A Case Report

Patient: Male, 64-year-old Final Diagnosis: Intrapancreatic accessory spleen Symptoms: Found on physical examination with no obvious clinical symptoms Clinical Procedure: — Specialty: Oncology • Surgery OBJECTIVE: Rare disease BACKGROUND: Intrapancreatic accessory spleen, or splenunculus, is a conge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiao, Chaohui, Xu, Yan, Sun, Fang, Li, Changtian, Liu, Rong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37170482
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AJCR.939324
Descripción
Sumario:Patient: Male, 64-year-old Final Diagnosis: Intrapancreatic accessory spleen Symptoms: Found on physical examination with no obvious clinical symptoms Clinical Procedure: — Specialty: Oncology • Surgery OBJECTIVE: Rare disease BACKGROUND: Intrapancreatic accessory spleen, or splenunculus, is a congenital condition that occurs in up to 2% of the population, with the tail of the pancreas being the second most common site. Imaging alone may not confirm the diagnosis as this can mimic a hypervascular tumor on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This report presents a challenging case of intrapancreatic accessory spleen in the tail of the pancreas in a 64-year-old man. CASE REPORT: A 64-year-old man was admitted for a space-occupying lesion in the tail of the pancreas. CT, MRI, and positron emission tomography-CT could not confirm the diagnosis. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy was not performed given the potential for greater risk. The mass in the patient’s pancreatic tail was considered benign or low-grade malignant. The patient then underwent a robotic pancreatectomy to remove the tumor in the tail of the pancreas. We performed intraoperative ultrasound scanning and detected a hypoechoic nodule in the body of the pancreas. This nodule had a clear boundary, and color Doppler flow imaging showed that there was no definite blood flow signal in it. The pathology diagnosis after surgery was intrapancreatic accessory spleen. The patient recovered without other complications and was discharged 5 days later. CONCLUSIONS: This report highlights the importance of considering the diagnosis of intrapancreatic accessory spleen in hypervascular lesions seen on imaging alone and of confirming the diagnosis with definitive cytopathology or histopathology.