Cargando…
Has the quality of reporting improved since it became mandatory to use the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy?
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether making the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) mandatory by the leading journal ‘Radiology’ in 2016 improved the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. METHODS: A validated search term was used to identify diagnostic accuracy studies p...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37184759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01432-7 |
_version_ | 1785042182296567808 |
---|---|
author | Stahl, Ann-Christine Tietz, Anne-Sophie Dewey, Marc Kendziora, Benjamin |
author_facet | Stahl, Ann-Christine Tietz, Anne-Sophie Dewey, Marc Kendziora, Benjamin |
author_sort | Stahl, Ann-Christine |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether making the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) mandatory by the leading journal ‘Radiology’ in 2016 improved the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. METHODS: A validated search term was used to identify diagnostic accuracy studies published in Radiology in 2015 and 2019. STARD adherence was assessed by two independent reviewers. Each item was scored as yes (1 point) if adequately reported or as no (0 points) if not. The total STARD score per article was calculated. Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney tests were used to evaluate differences of the total STARD scores between 2015 and 2019. In addition, the total STARD score was compared between studies stratified by study design, citation rate, and data collection. RESULTS: The median number of reported STARD items for the total of 66 diagnostic accuracy studies from 2015 to 2019 was 18.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 17.5–20.0) of 29. Adherence to the STARD checklist significantly improved the STARD score from a median of 18.0 (IQR 15.5–19.5) in 2015 to a median of 19.5 (IQR 18.5–21.5) in 2019 (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between studies stratified by mode of data collection (prospective vs. retrospective studies, p = 0.68), study design (cohort vs. case–control studies, p = 0.81), and citation rate (two groups divided by median split [< 0.56 citations/month vs. ≥ 0.56 citations/month], p = 0.54). CONCLUSIONS: Making use of the STARD checklist mandatory significantly increased the adherence with reporting standards for diagnostic accuracy studies and should be considered by editors and publishers for widespread implementation. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Editors may consider making reporting guidelines mandatory to improve the scientific quality. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-023-01432-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10184623 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101846232023-05-16 Has the quality of reporting improved since it became mandatory to use the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy? Stahl, Ann-Christine Tietz, Anne-Sophie Dewey, Marc Kendziora, Benjamin Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether making the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) mandatory by the leading journal ‘Radiology’ in 2016 improved the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. METHODS: A validated search term was used to identify diagnostic accuracy studies published in Radiology in 2015 and 2019. STARD adherence was assessed by two independent reviewers. Each item was scored as yes (1 point) if adequately reported or as no (0 points) if not. The total STARD score per article was calculated. Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney tests were used to evaluate differences of the total STARD scores between 2015 and 2019. In addition, the total STARD score was compared between studies stratified by study design, citation rate, and data collection. RESULTS: The median number of reported STARD items for the total of 66 diagnostic accuracy studies from 2015 to 2019 was 18.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 17.5–20.0) of 29. Adherence to the STARD checklist significantly improved the STARD score from a median of 18.0 (IQR 15.5–19.5) in 2015 to a median of 19.5 (IQR 18.5–21.5) in 2019 (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between studies stratified by mode of data collection (prospective vs. retrospective studies, p = 0.68), study design (cohort vs. case–control studies, p = 0.81), and citation rate (two groups divided by median split [< 0.56 citations/month vs. ≥ 0.56 citations/month], p = 0.54). CONCLUSIONS: Making use of the STARD checklist mandatory significantly increased the adherence with reporting standards for diagnostic accuracy studies and should be considered by editors and publishers for widespread implementation. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Editors may consider making reporting guidelines mandatory to improve the scientific quality. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-023-01432-7. Springer Vienna 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10184623/ /pubmed/37184759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01432-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Stahl, Ann-Christine Tietz, Anne-Sophie Dewey, Marc Kendziora, Benjamin Has the quality of reporting improved since it became mandatory to use the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy? |
title | Has the quality of reporting improved since it became mandatory to use the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy? |
title_full | Has the quality of reporting improved since it became mandatory to use the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy? |
title_fullStr | Has the quality of reporting improved since it became mandatory to use the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy? |
title_full_unstemmed | Has the quality of reporting improved since it became mandatory to use the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy? |
title_short | Has the quality of reporting improved since it became mandatory to use the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy? |
title_sort | has the quality of reporting improved since it became mandatory to use the standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37184759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01432-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stahlannchristine hasthequalityofreportingimprovedsinceitbecamemandatorytousethestandardsforreportingdiagnosticaccuracy AT tietzannesophie hasthequalityofreportingimprovedsinceitbecamemandatorytousethestandardsforreportingdiagnosticaccuracy AT deweymarc hasthequalityofreportingimprovedsinceitbecamemandatorytousethestandardsforreportingdiagnosticaccuracy AT kendziorabenjamin hasthequalityofreportingimprovedsinceitbecamemandatorytousethestandardsforreportingdiagnosticaccuracy |